Skip to main content

Brazil’s Boom and Bust in Tanzania: A Case Study of Naivety?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brazil-Africa Relations in the 21st Century
  • 188 Accesses

Abstract

Brazil experienced a dramatic see-saw in relations with Africa in the first two decades of the twenty-first century. Booming ties in diplomacy, development cooperation and trade saw Brazil established as a major partner for the continent under the leadership of Lula’s PT administration. Subsequent governments increasingly dismantled many of the policies supporting this boom. However, this collapse, and what it signifies about Brazil’s Africa relations, is still little understood, and more widely, there are few detailed case studies of this trend. This chapter tackles both gaps with a study of Brazil-Tanzania, which mirrored the wider boom and bust. Its analysis demonstrates the degree to which the spread of ties beyond lusophone countries was state-initiated, with diplomacy playing a central role, but then implemented by companies who shaped what occurred ‘on the ground’. This created a weakness in Brazil-Africa relations, given Brazil’s presidential system and its influence over foreign policy priorities and development cooperation spending. Additionally, the chapter introduces the concept of naivety amongst Brazilian actors, as a misreading of Tanzanian politics prevented infrastructure companies from establishing projects. However, the chapter concludes by arguing that any understanding of Brazil-Africa must appreciate the crucial role of African agency. As demonstrated here by Tanzanian politicians and government officials, countries on the continent fundamentally shape the processes, activities and successes of Brazilian involvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. 1.

    Derived from a total South-South cooperation spend of US$1.2 billion (although this is disputed; see Carmody (2013, 127)) of which 60% supposedly went to Africa.

  2. 2.

    Figures from the Brazilian Trade and Investment Promotion Agency (APEX – Agência Brasileira de Promoção de Exportações e Investimentos): https://tradingeconomics.com/brazil/exports-to-africa.

  3. 3.

    At 2100 MW, it equals the Aswan High Dam in Egypt.

  4. 4.

    Interviews, senior Itamaraty diplomat, São Paulo, 2019.

  5. 5.

    For instance, in 2010 and 2013 (Dye 2018, chapter 7).

  6. 6.

    Although this is disputed; see Carmody (2013, 127).

  7. 7.

    Falling to US$396 million in 2013 (Seibert 2019a).

  8. 8.

    Interview, former senior official, PT Government, 2016.

  9. 9.

    Interviews, senior journalist and Itamaraty diplomat, Brasilia, 2016.

  10. 10.

    See https://www.ufrgs.br/cebrafrica/en/sobre/.

  11. 11.

    As reflected by interviews with senior and junior Itamaraty diplomats and researchers and senior officials in Odebrecht, Queiroz Galvão, Eletrobras, 2015–2016.

  12. 12.

    Interviews, senior diplomats, Itamaraty, Rio de Janeiro, Dar es Salaam.

  13. 13.

    Interviews (World Food Programme 2017).

  14. 14.

    Signed off in 2016.

  15. 15.

    Itamaraty press statements; interviews with senior and junior Itamaraty and Tanzanian diplomats, 2015–2016.

  16. 16.

    Conducted in 2015–2016.

  17. 17.

    Interview, diplomat, Itamaraty, 2015.

  18. 18.

    Interview, senior diplomat, Itamaraty, 2016.

  19. 19.

    Interview, senior diplomat, Itamaraty, 2016.

  20. 20.

    Interview, senior diplomat, Itamaraty, 2016.

  21. 21.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016.

  22. 22.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016.

  23. 23.

    Interview, senior official, World Bank, 2017.

  24. 24.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016.

  25. 25.

    Interview, senior diplomat, Itamaraty, 2016.

  26. 26.

    Interview, senior official, Queiroz Galvão, 2016.

  27. 27.

    Interviews, official, RUBADA, 2016–2015; the regulator being NEMC.

  28. 28.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016; interviews, senior and junior officials, Itamaraty, 2015–2016.

  29. 29.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016; interview, senior diplomat, Itamaraty, 2016.

  30. 30.

    Interview, senior official, Itamaraty, 2016.

  31. 31.

    Interview, senior official, Itamaraty, 2016.

  32. 32.

    Ubungo I (2009); Ubungo II (2012).

  33. 33.

    Tegeta Gas (2009).

  34. 34.

    Kinyerezi I (2015); Kinyerezi II (2018).

  35. 35.

    Interview, senior official, Queiroz Galvão, 2016.

  36. 36.

    Interview, senior diplomat, Itamaraty, 2016.

  37. 37.

    For instance, visiting the Itaipu Dam, Odebrecht offices and the Ministry of Energy.

  38. 38.

    Interview, senior official, Itamaraty, 2016.

  39. 39.

    Interview, senior official, Queiroz Galvão, 2016.

  40. 40.

    Interview, senior official, Queiroz Galvão, 2016.

  41. 41.

    Interview, senior and junior officials, Itamaraty, 2015–2016.

  42. 42.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016.

  43. 43.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016; interview, senior officials, Itamaraty, 2015–2016.

  44. 44.

    Namely, the Richmond-Dowans, ITPL, Songas plants.

  45. 45.

    Interview, senior official, Aldwych, 2016.

  46. 46.

    Interview, senior official, Odebrecht, 2016.

  47. 47.

    From the same constituency as the president and reportedly a family relation.

  48. 48.

    Personal correspondence, Academics, December, 2018, and February, 2019.

  49. 49.

    See https://www.arabcont.com/English/.

References

  • Agência Brasileira de Cooperação. 2010. Brazilian technical cooperation in Africa. Brasilia: ABC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alencastro, Mathias. 2019. Brazilian corruption overseas: The case of Odebrecht in Angola. In Corruption in Latin America: How politicians and corporations steal from citizens, ed. Robert Rotberg, 109–123. Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, Lidia. 2016. Brazil’s tropical solutions for Africa: Tractors, matracas and the politics of ‘appropriate technology’. The European Journal of Development Research 28: 414–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capi, Eliza, and Natália Viana. 2016. Em Angola, a Odebrecht no espelho. Publica, February 22. https://apublica.org/2016/02/em-angola-a-odebrecht-no-espelho/. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • Carmody, Pádraig. 2013. The rise of the BRICS in Africa: The geopolitics of south-south relations. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cezne, Eric. 2019. Forging transnational ties from below: Challenging the Brazilian mining giant Vale S.A. across the South Atlantic. The Extractive Industries and Society 6 (4): 1174–1183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collord, Michaela. 2018. The political economy of institutions in Africa: Comparing authoritarian parties and parliaments in Tanzania and Uganda. PhD dissertation, Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Construtora Queiroz Galvão. 2012. Mnyera River-Tanzania: Implementation of hydroelectric developments; technical preliminary feasibility studies. Rio de Janeiro: Construtora Queiroz Galvão.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulson, Andrew. 2013. Tanzania: A political economy. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duvail, S., A.B. Mwakalinga, A. Eijkelenburg, O. Hamerlynck, K. Kindinda, and A. Majule. 2014. Jointly thinking the post-dam future: Exchange of local and scientific knowledge on the lakes of the Lower Rufiji, Tanzania. Hydrological Sciences Journal 59 (3–4): 713–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Barnaby Joseph. 2018. The politics of dam resurgence: High modernist statebuilding and the emerging powers in Africa. PhD dissertation, Oxford: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Barnaby Joseph, and Mathias Alencastro. 2020. Debunking Brazilian exceptionalism in its Africa relations: Evidence from Angola and Tanzania. Global Society 34 (4): 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dye, Barnaby Joseph, and Joerg Hartmann. 2017. The true cost of power: The facts and risks of building the Stiegler’s Gorge hydropower dam in the Selous Game Reserve, Tanzania. Gland: World Wildlife Fund International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, Ana, and Karina Kato. 2015. The story of hunter and the hunted? Brazil’s role in Angola and Mozambique. In BRICS: An anti-capitalist critique, ed. Patrick Bond and Ana Garcia, 117–134. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Hazel. 2015. The political economy of grand corruption in Tanzania. African Affairs 114 (456): 382–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, Kathryn. 2014. The Brazilian National Development Bank goes international: Innovations and limitations of BNDES’ internationalization. Global Policy 5 (3): 360–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochstetler, Kathryn, and Cristina Yumie Aoki Inoue. 2019. South-south relations and global environmental governance: Brazilian international development cooperation. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 62 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201900204.

  • Jaeger, Tilman, Guy Debonnet, and Nelson Guma. 2014. Reactive monitoring mission Selous Game Reserve (United Republic of Tanzania). UNESCO World Heritage Centre – IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Limongi, Fernando. 2006. A democracia no Brasil: presidencialismo, coalizão partidária e processo decisório. Novos Estudos CEBRAP 76: 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhwago, Rodgers. 2017. JPM snubs Stiegler’s critics. Daily News, June 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makoye, Kizito. 2015. As hydropower dries up, Tanzania moves toward fossil fuels. Reuters, December 29. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tanzania-hydropower-drought/as-hydropower-dries-up-tanzania-moves-toward-fossil-fuels-idUSKBN0UC0SS20151229. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • Marcondes, Danilo, and Emma Mawdsley. 2017. South–south in retreat? The transitions from Lula to Rousseff to Temer and Brazilian development cooperation. International Affairs 93 (3): 681–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, Emma, Sung-Mi Kim, and Danilo Marcondes. 2017. Political leadership and ‘non-traditional’ development cooperation. Third World Quarterly 38 (10): 2171–2186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meskell, Lynn. 2018. A future in ruins: UNESCO, world heritage, and the dream of peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, Giles, and Ben Lampert. 2013. Negotiating China: Reinserting African agency into China-Africa relations. African Affairs 112 (446): 92–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odebrecht. 2013. Stiegler’s Gorge HPP: Presentation of report and proposal. Dar es Salaam: Odebrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, Marcus, Giles Mohan, and May Tan-Mullins. 2012. China’s resource diplomacy in Africa: Powering development? Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reuters. 2018. UPDATE 1-Petrobras to sell stake in Africa unit to Vitol-led group for $1.5 bln. Reuters, October 31. https://www.reuters.com/article/petrobras-divestiture/update-1-petrobras-to-sell-stake-in-africa-unit-to-vitol-led-group-for-1-5-bln-idUSL2N1XB2CR. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • Seibert, Gerhard. 2019a. Brazil-Africa relations from the sixteenth to the twentieth century. In Brazil-Africa relations: Historical dimensions and contemporary engagements from the 1960s to the present, ed. Gerhard Seibert and Paulo Visentini, 11–46. Suffolk: James Currey.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2019b. Brazil’s development and financial cooperation with African countries. In Brazil-Africa relations: Historical dimensions and contemporary engagements from the 1960s to the present, ed. Gerhard Seibert and Paulo Visentini, 99–130. Suffolk: James Currey.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Seibert, Gerhard, and Paulo Visentini. 2019. Brazil-Africa relations after Lula: Continuity without priority. In Brazil-Africa relations: Historical dimensions and contemporary engagements from the 1960s to the present, ed. Gerhard Seibert and Paulo Visentini, 197–220. Suffolk: James Currey.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Soares de Oliveira, Ricardo. 2015. Magnificent and beggar land: Angola since the civil war. London: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard Bank. 2017. BRICS 2017: Poised for new relevance. Standard Bank. https://sponsorships.standardbank.com/CIB/About-us/Insights-Hub/BRICS-2017:-poised-for-new-relevance. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • Stolte, Christina. 2015. Brazil’s Africa strategy: Role conception and the drive for international status. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stratfor. 2017. Brazil and Africa bridge the South Atlantic. Stratfor, July 27. https://worldview.stratfor.com/article/brazil-and-africa-bridge-south-atlantic. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • teleSUR. 2019. Brazil closes 5 Caribbean embassies citing costs and staffing. teleSUR, June 5. https://www.telesurenglish.net/news/Brazil-Closes-5-Caribbean-Embassies-Citing-Costs-and-Staffing-20190605-0023.html. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • The Economist. 2017. Brazil puts its state development bank on a diet. The Economist, November 30. https://www.economist.com/finance-and-economics/2017/11/30/brazil-puts-its-state-development-bank-on-a-diet. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • UNESCO WHC. 2018. UNESCO expresses concern over the state of conservation of Selous Game Reserve. UNESCO, February 22. https://whc.unesco.org/en/news/1785. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

  • United Republic of Tanzania, Ministry of Energy and Minerals. 2009. Power system master plan, 2009. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Energy and Minerals.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Power system master plan 2012 update. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Energy and Minerals.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Power system master plan 2016 update. Dar es Salaam: Ministry of Energy and Minerals.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitfield, Lindsay, and Alistair Fraser. 2009. Negotiating aid. In The politics of aid: African strategies for dealing with donors, ed. Lindsay Whitfield, 1–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Food Programme. 2017. New project promotes cooperation between Brazil and Africa in the cotton sector. WFP Centre of Excellence against Hunger, October 6. https://centrodeexcelencia.org.br/en/new-project-promotes-cooperation-brazil-africa-cotton-sector/. Accessed 15 Jan 2020.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barnaby Joseph Dye .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dye, B.J. (2021). Brazil’s Boom and Bust in Tanzania: A Case Study of Naivety?. In: Alencastro, M., Seabra, P. (eds) Brazil-Africa Relations in the 21st Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55720-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics