Skip to main content

Current Issues in Design Policies: Balancing Tensions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Design, Music and Arts (EIMAD 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Design and Innovation ((SSDI,volume 9))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Deriving from the scholarly debate surrounding design policies in the past 25 years, this paper proposes a novel triangulation of fundamental issues which remain unsolved, by highlighting them and analyzing how they relate to each other. The issues under analysis are innovation policies, the role of design in research, development and innovation and the multiplicity of design definitions. These are intrinsically linked with Design policies, but their interconnections are not well established or visible, leading to conflicting perspectives and tensions. Ultimately, this approach provides new insights on the rationale and construction of Design policies, towards prospective interpretations for their role and aspirations.

R. Monteiro—This paper was developed within the context of the author Rui Monteiro FCT Research Scholarship (FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia e Fundo Social Europeu), PD/BD/150494/2019.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atkinson P (2017) The design journal and the meaning of design. Des J 20(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1253247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayazit N (2004) Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Des Issues, 20(1), 16–29. www.jstor.org/stable/1511952

  • Bason et al (2012) Design for growth and prosperity - report and recommendations of the European design leadership board. European design leadership board, European commission

    Google Scholar 

  • BEDA & Design4Innovation (2018) Next practice in design action plans. https://www.interregeurope.eu/design4innovation/events/event/2087/insight-forum-2018/. Accessed 20 Nov 2018

  • BEDA & PDR (2018) Design action plan for Europe 2.0? Workshop transcript, Thessaloniki, 07 June 18. https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_tevprojects/library/file_1533120355.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2019

  • Cautela C, Deserti A, Rizzo F, Zurlo F (2014) Design and innovation: how many ways? Des Issues 30(1):3–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank L (2010) The innovation dimension: designing in a broader context. Des Issues 26(2):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cope B, Kalantzis M (2011) Design in principle and practice: a reconsideration of the terms of design engagement. Des J 14(1):45–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Concilio G et al (2019) Innovation and design. SpringerBriefs in applied sciences and technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00123-0_4

  • Cooper R, Hernandez R, Murphy E, Tether B (2017) Design value: the role of design in innovation. https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.28595.43046

  • Cox G (2005) Cox review of creativity in business: building on the UK’s strengths. Design Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S, Gristwood S (2016) The structure of design processes: ideal and reality in Bruce Archer’s 1968 doctoral thesis. In: Proceedings of DRS 2016, design research society 50th anniversary conference, Brighton, UK, 27–30 June 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorst K (2004) On the problem of design problems - problem solving and design expertise. J Des Res (JDR) 4(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne A, Raby F (2013) Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • European commission (2013) Implementing an action plan for design-driven innovation. Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada S, Pacheco RV (2009) Sistemas y Políticas de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación. Algunas propuestas. Espiral, Estudios sobre Estado y Sociedad, vol. XV, no. 44 Enero/Abril de 2009. México

    Google Scholar 

  • Filippetti A (2011) Innovation modes and design as a source of innovation: a firm- level analysis. Eur J Innov Manage 14(1):5–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez C, Lecuona M, Hernandez M (2018) Concordancia de las políticas de diseño con el marco de medición de la innovación del Manual de Oslo. Revista 180, 62. https://doi.org/10.32995/rev180.num-41.(2018).art-359

  • Gonzalez C, Lecuona M, Hernandez M (2016) Análisis de bibliografía sobre políticas de diseño. Iconofacto [S.l.] 12(19), 268–293. ISSN 1900-2785

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández R, Cooper R, Tether B, Murphy E (2018) Design, the language of innovation: a review of the design studies literature. She Ji J Des Econ Innov 4(3):249–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M, Boddington A, Grantham A (2011) An innovation perspective on design: part A. Des Issues 27(4):5–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday M, Boddington A, Grantham A (2012) Policies for design and policies for innovation: contrasting perspectives and remaining challenges. Technovation 32(2012):272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icelandic Government (2014) Design as a driver for future: Icelandic design policy 2014–2018. Ministry of Industries and Innovation and Ministry of Education, Science and Culture. Iceland

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (2000) Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educ Technol Res Dev 48(4):63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff K (2005) The semantic turn: a new foundation for design. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Liu H, Zhang Y (2017) The new role of design in innovation: a policy perspective from China. Des J 21(1):37–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1395167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence C (2014) Why the next generation of designers will save the world. Des Manage Rev 25(2):42–46

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott C (2007) Design: the key concepts. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maffei S, Mortati M, Villari B, Arquilla V (2015) Assessing European design policy. Towards an evaluation culture. In: The virtuous circle cumulus conference, 3–7 June, Milan, pp 870–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro R, Giesteira B, Boddington A, Farinha C (2019) An analysis on the positioning of Design within the context of the European innovation programme Horizon 2020 and the “Action Plan for Design-Drive Innovation” policy. In: Brandão Pereira J, Tavares P (eds) O design como agente para o desenvolvimento territorial e a territorialização. CAOS Communication, Art and Object Sinergies – Practice Research, the time is now. DRX: Registos de Investigação em Design. ISBN 978-989-54489-6-8 (translated from Portuguese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro R, Giesteira B, Boddington A, Farinha C (2017) Design: lost in translation? How the concept of design is understood and might be clarified within European Union policies when looking at a funding application process, Poster. Ciência 2017, FCT/MCTES, Lisbon, July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro R, Giesteira B, Boddington A, Farinha C (2018) An overview of “design” public policies: exploring the cases of India, Queensland (Australia) and the European Union. In: 20th international conference on cultural economics, Melbourne, 26–29 June 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortati M (2013) Systemic aspects of innovation and design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03242-9

  • Mortati M (2015) A framework for design innovation: present and future discussions. Des Issues 31:4–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA, Verganti R (2013) Incremental and radical innovation: design research vs. technology and meaning change. Des Issues 30(1):78–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nomen E (2014) Guidelines for collecting and interpreting design data: a proposal for a future barcelona manual on design. €Design – measuring design value

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2015) Frascati manual 2015: Guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation

    Google Scholar 

  • Activities. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239012-en

  • OECD/Eurostat (2018) Oslo manual 2018: guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation, 4th edn, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

  • Pekkala J, Ylirisku S (2017) The role of design concepts in the development of digitalized industrial services. Des J 20(sup1):S2813–S2822. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piñero A, Rodríguez-Monroy C, Arzola M (2012) Vinculación y evaluación de políticas públicas de I+D+i para dinamizar la innovación en las PYMIS. Interciencia, 37(12), 883–890. ISSN: 0378-1844

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland government (2008) Queensland design strategy 2020. Arts Queensland, Department of Education, Training and the Arts. Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic S (2012) Innovation policy studies between theory and practice: a literature review based analysis, vol 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Raulik-Murphy G (2010) A comparative analysis of strategies for design promotion in different national contexts (doctoral dissertation). University of Wales Institute, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva G, Serio L (2016) The sixth wave of innovation: are we ready? RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, vol 13, no 2, pp 128–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab K (2017) The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt P (2018) Market failure vs. system failure as a rationale for economic policy? a critique from an evolutionary perspective. J Evol Econ 28, 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-018-0564-6

  • Tezel E (2012) Theoretical and historical perspectives in design, innovation and policies. In: Archi-cultural translations through the silk road 2nd international conference, Mukogawa Women’s Univ., Nishinomiya, Japan, 14–16 July 2012 proceedings

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2020) World Social Report 2020. Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat

    Google Scholar 

  • Verganti R (2006) Innovating through design. Harvard Bus Rev 84(12):114–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker S, Lloyd P (2014) Design research and public policy: current practice working to intersect with government. All-party parliamentary design & innovation group term paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker S (2011) The spirit of design: objects, environment and meaning. Earthscan publications, London ISBN 9781849713634

    Google Scholar 

  • Whicher A, Cawood G (2012) European design systems and innovation policy. sharing experience Europe - policy innovation design. Policy booklet 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Whicher A (2017) Design ecosystems and innovation policy in Europe. Strateg Des Res J 10(2). https://doi.org/10.4013/sdrj.2017.102.04

  • Whicher A, Swiatek P, Ward J (2018) Design4Innovation policy booklet 1: mapping design ecosystems. https://www.interregeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_tevprojects/library/file_1529256710.pdf. Accessed 28 Jan 2019

  • Yazdani B (1999) Four models of design definition: sequential, design centered, concurrent and dynamic. J Eng Des 10:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/095448299261407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • € Design|Measuring design value (2014) Guidelines for collecting and interpreting design data - a proposal for a future Barcelona manual on design. BDC Barcelona design centre

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rui Monteiro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Monteiro, R., Giesteira, B., Boddington, A., Farinha, C. (2021). Current Issues in Design Policies: Balancing Tensions. In: Raposo, D., Neves, J., Silva, J., Correia Castilho, L., Dias, R. (eds) Advances in Design, Music and Arts. EIMAD 2020. Springer Series in Design and Innovation , vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55700-3_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55700-3_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55699-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55700-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics