Skip to main content

Rule-Based Safety Evidence for Neural Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2020 Workshops (SAFECOMP 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12235))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Neural networks have many applications in safety and mission critical systems. As industrial standards in various safety-critical domains require developers of critical systems to provide safety assurance, tools and techniques must be developed that enable effective creation of safety evidence for AI systems. In this position paper, we propose the use of rules extracted from neural networks as artefacts for safety evidence. We discuss the rationale behind the use of rules and illustrate it using the MNIST dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ericson, C.A.: Concise Encyclopedia of System Safety: Definition of Terms and Concepts. Wiley, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ministry of Defence (MoD) UK: Defence Stanandard 00–56 Issue 4: Safety Management Requirements for Defence Systems (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. de la Vara, J.L., et al.: Towards a model-based evolutionary chain of evidence for compliance with safety standards. In: Ortmeier, F., Daniel, P. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7613, pp. 64–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33675-1_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. de la Vara, J., Nair, S., Walawege, R.P.: On the use of artefacts as safety evidence: a conceptual model. Technical report (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kornecki, A., Janusz, Z.: Certification of software for real-time safety critical systems: state of the art. Innov. Syst. Softw. Eng. 5, 149–161 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-009-0088-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Craven, M.W.: Extracting comprehensible models from trained neural networks. Ph.D dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bologna, G.: A model for single and multiple knowledge based networks. Artif. Intell. Med. 28, 141–163 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Croce, F., Andriushchenko, M., Hein, M.: Provable robustness of ReLU networks via maximization of linear regions. In: AISTATS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: ICLR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Craven, M., Shavlik, J.: Using sampling and queries to extract rules from trained neural networks. In Machine Learning: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference, San Francisco, CA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. KumarSethi, K., Kumar Mishra, D., Mishra, B.: Extended taxonomy of rule extraction techniques and assessment of KDRuleEx. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 50(21), 25–31 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozbakır, L., Baykasoglu, A., Kulluk, S.: A soft computing-based approach for integrated training and rule extraction from artificial neural networks: DIFACONN-miner. Appl. Soft Comput. 10, 304–317 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sato, M., Tsukimoto, H.: Rule extraction from neural networks via decision tree induction. In: International Joint Conference On Neural Network (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zilke, J.: Extracting rules from deep neural networks. M.S. thesis, Computer Science Department, Technische Universitaet Darmstadt (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Setiono, R., Leow, W.K.: FERNN: an algorithm for fast extraction of rules from neural networks. Appl. Intell. 12, 12–25 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008307919726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Andrews, R., et al.: An evaluation and comparison of techniques for extracting and refining rules from artificial neural networks. QUT NRC, February 1996

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fu, L.M.: Rule generation from neural networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 28(8), 1114–1124 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., Tong, Y.: Federated machine learning: concept and applications. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 10, 1–19 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wong, E., Kolter, J.Z.: Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope. In: ICML (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tewodros A. Beyene .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Beyene, T.A., Sahu, A. (2020). Rule-Based Safety Evidence for Neural Networks. In: Casimiro, A., Ortmeier, F., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F., Ferreira, P. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2020 Workshops. SAFECOMP 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12235. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55583-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55583-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55582-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55583-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics