Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sustainable Supplier Segmentation: A Practical Procedure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Decision Making for Sustainable Management of Industrial Networks

Part of the book series: Greening of Industry Networks Studies ((GINS,volume 8))

Abstract

Sustainability of supply chain is determined by the sustainability performance of each partner in the chain. The relationship between buyer and supplier has an important role in improving the sustainability of supply chain. The purpose of this chapter is to explain the process of segmenting the sustainable suppliers and presenting strategies for collaboration and improvement of the suppliers. In this chapter, a six-step process is suggested in which the output of one step is considered as the input of the other step. At first, the performance indicators in each dimension of sustainability are introduced, and then given the performance indicators in the segmentation model, the sustainable suppliers are assigned into seven segments (three main segments, economic, social, and environmental; three balancing segments, bearable, viable, and equitable; and supplementary segment, sustainable). Finally, some supplier development strategies appropriate to each dimension of sustainability are suggested. The present study is beneficial for the researchers and companies’ executive managers. By a deeper understanding of this process, researchers can benefit from the proposed process for sustainable supplier segmentation, and the corporate executives and experts can have the opportunity of using the supplier collaboration and development strategies in the supply chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adetunji, I., Price, A., Fleming, P., & Kemp, P. (2003). Sustainability and the UK construction industry—A review. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability (Vol. 156, No. 4, pp. 185–199). Thomas Telford Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ağan, Y., Acar, M. F., & Neureuther, B. (2018). The importance of supplier development for sustainability. In Sustainable freight transport (pp. 165–178). Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Green supplier development: Analytical evaluation using rough set theory. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(12), 1200–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai, C., Rezaei, J., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Multicriteria green supplier segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 64(4), 515–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björklund, M., Martinsen, U., & Abrahamsson, M. (2012). Performance measurements in the greening of supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 17(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blome, C., Hollos, D., & Paulraj, A. (2014). Green procurement and green supplier development: Antecedents and effects on supplier performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(1), 32–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, F. E., Cousins, P. D., Lamming, R. C., & Farukt, A. C. (2001). The role of supply management capabilities in green supply. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 174–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2002). Business and society with infotrac: Ethics and stakeholder management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. R., & Rogers, D. S. (2008). A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(5), 360–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A., & Paquet, M. (2012). Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, Y. K. F., & Rowlinson, S. (2011). Supply chain sustainability: A relationship management approach. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(3), 480–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, S. J., & Parkinson, S. (2003). Localisation of UK food production: An analysis using land area and energy as indicators. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 94(2), 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, M., Magnan, G. M., & Moeller, M. M. (2010). Evaluating the bases of supplier segmentation: A review and taxonomy. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(4), 625–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diba, S., & Xie, N. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection for Satrec Vitalait Milk Company in Senegal using the novel grey relational analysis method. Grey Systems: Theory and Application, 9(3), 262–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, J. H., & Ouchi, W. G. (1993). Japanese-style partnerships: Giving companies a competitive edge. MIT Sloan Management Review, 35(1), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eltayeb, T. K., Zailani, S., & Ramayah, T. (2011). Green supply chain initiatives among certified companies in Malaysia and environmental sustainability: Investigating the outcomes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 55(5), 495–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faisal, M. N., Al-Esmael, B., & Sharif, K. J. (2017). Supplier selection for a sustainable supply chain: Triple bottom line (3BL) and analytic network process approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(7), 1956–1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, Y., & Saththasivam, G. (2017). Green supply chain agility in EMS ISO 14001 manufacturing firms: Empirical justification of social and environmental performance as an organisational outcome. International Journal of Procurement Management, 10(1), 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg, C. P., & Sharma, A. (2018). Sustainable outsourcing partner selection and evaluation using an integrated BWM–VIKOR framework. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glock, C. H., Grosse, E. H., & Ries, J. M. (2017). Reprint of “Decision support models for supplier development: Systematic literature review and research agenda”. International Journal of Production Economics, 194, 246–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hadjikhani, A., & LaPlaca, P. (2013). Development of B2B marketing theory. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(3), 294–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handfield, R. B., Walton, S. V., Seegers, L. K., & Melnyk, S. A. (1997). ‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management, 15(4), 293e315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, D., & Ghobadian, A. (2009). An empirical study of green supply chain management practices amongst UK manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(7), 933–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, Y., Ryan, J. K., & Yund, W. (2013). Two stage procurement processes with competitive suppliers and uncertain supplier quality. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(1), 147–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2002). Supplier selection and assessment: Their impact on business performance. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 38(3), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraljic, P. (1983). Purchasing must become supply management. Harvard Business Review, 61(5), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D. R., Scannell, T. V., & Calantone, R. J. (2000). A structural analysis of the effectiveness of buying firms’ strategies to improve supplier performance. Decision Sciences, 31(1), 33–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B., Cousins, P. D., Handfield, R. B., & Petersen, K. J. (2009). Strategic purchasing, supply management practices and buyer performance improvement: An empirical study of UK manufacturing organizations. International Journal of Production Research, 47(10), 2649–2667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., Humphreys, P. K., Yeung, A. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2012). The impact of supplier development on buyer competitive advantage: A path analytic model. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(1), 353–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kannan, D., Mangla, S. K., & Garg, C. P. (2017). An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 1686–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Claudy, M. (2015). Going above and beyond: How sustainability culture and entrepreneurial orientation drive social sustainability supply chain practice adoption. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 434–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Blanco, J., Lehmann, A., Muñoz, P., Antón, A., Traverso, M., Rieradevall, J., & Finkbeiner, M. (2014). Application challenges for the social Life Cycle Assessment of fertilizers within life cycle sustainability assessment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 69, 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, C. L., & Pato, M. V. (2019). Supply chain sustainability: A tertiary literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 995–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, M. S., Lee, Y. H., & Mari, S. I. (2015). Group multi-criteria supplier selection using combined grey systems theory and uncertainty theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(21), 7951–7959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monczka, R. M., Trent, R. J., & Callahan, T. J. (1993). Supply base strategies to maximize supplier performance. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23(4), 42–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narasimhan, R., Mahapatra, S., & Arlbjørn, J. S. (2008). Impact of relational norms, supplier development and trust on supplier performance. Operations Management Research, 1(1), 24–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. F., & Ellram, L. M. (1997). A portfolio approach to supplier relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(2), 101–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortas, E., Moneva, M., & Álvarez, I. (2014). Sustainable supply chain and company performance: A global examination. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(3), 332–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. (1980). Vendor segmentation: An additional level of market segmentation. Industrial Marketing Management, 9(1), 59–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J. (2018). Sustainable supplier selection: A process view. Handbook on the Sustainable Supply Chain, 136–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. (2012). A multi-variable approach to supplier segmentation. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4593–4611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., & Ortt, R. (2013). Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 225(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., Fahim, P. B., & Tavasszy, L. (2014). Supplier selection in the airline retail industry using a funnel methodology: Conjunctive screening method and fuzzy AHP. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(18), 8165–8179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., Wang, J., & Tavasszy, L. (2015). Linking supplier development to supplier segmentation using Best Worst Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(23), 9152–9164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sancha, C., Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., & Kazeminia, A. (2015). Does implementing social supplier development practices pay off? Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(4), 389–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segura, M., & Maroto, C. (2017). A multiple criteria supplier segmentation using outranking and value function methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 69, 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seuring, S., & Müller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, C. M., Horng, D. J., Tseng, M. L., Chiu, A. S., Wu, K. J., & Chen, H. P. (2016). Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 469–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, G. (2004). Supplier segmentation in the automotive industry: A dyadic approach of a managerial model. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(1), 12–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., & Chung, W. (2010). Manufacturer cooperation in supplier development under risk. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(1), 165–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavana, M., Yazdani, M., & Di Caprio, D. (2017). An application of an integrated ANP–QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 20(3), 254–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: The role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 299–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vachon, S., & Mao, Z. (2008). Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: A country-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1552–1560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, S. M., & Krause, D. R. (2009). Supplier development: Communication approaches, activities and goals. International Journal of Production Research, 47(12), 3161–3177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. S., Che, Z. H., & Wang, M. J. (2009). A three-phase integrated model for product configuration change problems. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 5491–5509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z., Subramanian, N., Gunasekaran, A., Abdulrahman, M. D., & Liu, C. (2015). Composite sustainable manufacturing practice and performance framework: Chinese auto-parts suppliers′ perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. W., & Shen, C. H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(9), 3529–3547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z., Qin, J., Liu, J., & Martínez, L. (2019). Sustainable supplier selection based on AHPSort II in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Information Sciences, 483, 273–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Musa, A., El-Berishy, N. M., Abubakar, T., & Ambursa, H. M. (2013). The UK oil and gas supply chains: An empirical analysis of adoption of sustainable measures and performance outcomes. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 501–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2007). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11–12), 1041–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K. H. (2008). Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 261–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, K., Fröhling, M., & Schultmann, F. (2016). Sustainable supplier management–a review of models supporting sustainable supplier selection, monitoring and development. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1412–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran

    Hamidreza Fallah Lajimi

Authors
  1. Hamidreza Fallah Lajimi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamidreza Fallah Lajimi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Jafar Rezaei

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lajimi, H.F. (2021). Sustainable Supplier Segmentation: A Practical Procedure. In: Rezaei, J. (eds) Strategic Decision Making for Sustainable Management of Industrial Networks. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55385-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation