Skip to main content

Location Selection of Bioethanol Distribution Centers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Decision Making for Sustainable Management of Industrial Networks

Part of the book series: Greening of Industry Networks Studies ((GINS,volume 8))

Abstract

In this chapter, the location problem of bioethanol distribution centers is investigated based on two objectives. While the first objective is to maximize the overall utility of the selected places, the second objective is to minimize the cost allocated to establishing the distribution centers. To solve the problem, a hybrid methodology consisting of the best-worst method (BWM) and a set covering model is proposed. BWM is employed to calculate the overall utility of candidate places, and the set covering model is used to select the minimum number of places. By employing the methodology, the selected distribution centers cover the demand of customers within a specific radius. To calculate the overall utility of the candidate places using BWM, a comprehensive framework of sustainability criteria is presented. The proposed framework is formed by criteria extracted from studies which have employed multi-criteria decision-making methods to solve the location problem of distribution centers in different industries. The result of BWM in the proposed methodology is employed as a parameter in the utility function of the set covering model. To solve the model, Lp-metric is suggested. The performance of the proposed methodology is evaluated by a set of data collected from Iran. The proposed hybrid methodology can also be used for locating distribution centers in other industries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrebi, M., Abed, M., & Omri, M. N. J. J. o. A. T. (2017). ELECTRE I based relevance decision-makers feedback to the location selection of distribution centers. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2017, Article ID 7131094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, W. N. K. W., Rezaei, J., Tavasszy, L. A., & de Brito, M. P. (2016). Commitment to and preparedness for sustainable supply chain management in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Environmental Management, 180, 202–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, N. K. W., de Brito, M. P., Rezaei, J., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2017a). An integrative framework for sustainable supply chain management practices in the oil and gas industry. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(4), 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, W. N. K. W., Rezaei, J., Sadaghiani, S., & Tavasszy, L. A. (2017b). Evaluation of the external forces affecting the sustainability of oil and gas supply chain using Best Worst Method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, 242–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anagnostopoulos, K., Doukas, H., & Psarras, J. J. E. S. w. A. (2008). A linguistic multicriteria analysis system combining fuzzy sets theory, ideal and anti-ideal points for location site selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 2041–2048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashrafzadeh, M., Rafiei, F. M., Isfahani, N. M., & Zare, Z. J. I. J. O. C. R. I. B. (2012). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS method for the selection of warehouse location: A case study. Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 655–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., Goyal, S. K. J. M., & Modelling, C. (2011). A multi-criteria decision making approach for location planning for urban distribution centers under uncertainty. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(1-2), 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagum, N., & Rashed, C. A. A. J. R. O. G. M. (2014). Multi-criteria analysis for the selection of location for distribution center using analytical hierarchy process. Review of General Management, 20, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Iwo, J., Manovic, V., & Longhurst, P. (2016). Biomass resources and biofuels potential for the production of transportation fuels in Nigeria. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 172–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan, N., & Rai, K. (2007). Strategic decision making: Applying the analytic hierarchy process. Cham: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouhana, A., Chabchoub, H., Abed, M., & Fekih, A. (2013). A multi-criteria decision making approach based on fuzzy theory and fuzzy preference relations for urban distribution centers’ location selection under uncertain environments. In 2013 international conference on advanced logistics and transport (pp. 556–561). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, F., & Zhang, R. (2009). The errors of approximation for feedforward neural networks in the Lp metric. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 49(7), 1563–1572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, R., Ray, A., & Dan, P. J. I. J. o. I. E. C. (2013). Multi criteria decision making methods for location selection of distribution centers. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 4(4), 491–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, F., & Chung, S. J. T. I. J. o. A. M. T. (2004). Multi-criteria genetic optimization for distribution network problems. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 24(7-8), 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-T. J. F. s., & systems. (2001). A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center. Fuzzy sets and systems, 118(1), 65–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, R., & Velle, C. R. (1974). The maximal covering location problem. Papers in regional science, 32(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirel, T., Demirel, N. Ç., & Kahraman, C. J. E. S. w. A. (2010). Multi-criteria warehouse location selection using Choquet integral. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3943–3952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey, B., Bairagi, B., Sarkar, B., Sanyal, S. K. J. I. J. o. M. S., & Management, E. (2016). Warehouse location selection by fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodologies based on subjective and objective criteria. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, 11(4), 262–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farahani, R. Z., & Asgari, N. (2007). Combination of MCDM and covering techniques in a hierarchical model for facility location: A case study. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(3), 1839–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., Wu, S., & Cai, L. (2009, April). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making TOPSIS for distribution center location selection. In 2009 international conference on networks security, wireless communications and trusted computing (Vol. 2, pp. 707–710). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, L., & Huailin, D. (2009, July). Research on logistics distribution center location problem based on genetic algorithm and AHP. In 2009 4th international conference on Computer Science & Education (pp. 213–217). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasakal, O., & Karasakal, E. K. (2004). A maximal covering location model in the presence of partial coverage. Computers & Operations Research, 31(9), 1515–1526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, K. (2008). Encyclopedia of geographic information science. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, C., Anwar, S., Bashir, S., Rauf, A., Amin, A. J. J. o. I., & Systems, F. (2015). Site selection for food distribution using rough set approach and TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 29(6), 2413–2419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheybari, S., Kazemi, M., & Rezaei, J. (2019a). Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method. Applied Energy, 242, 612–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kheybari, S., Rezaie, F. M., & Rezaei, J. (2019b). Measuring the importance of decision-making criteria in biofuel production technology selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2019.2908037.

  • Kuo, M.-S. J. E. S. w. A. (2011). Optimal location selection for an international distribution center by using a new hybrid method. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 7208–7221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanza-Gutierrez, J. M., Crawford, B., Soto, R., Berrios, N., Gomez-Pulido, J. A., & Paredes, F. (2017). Analyzing the effects of binarization techniques when solving the set covering problem through swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 70, 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.-S. (2005, August). A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making model for the selection of the distribution center. In International conference on natural computation (pp. 1290–1299). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-l., & Lin, S.-c. J. I. S. (2008). A fuzzy quantified SWOT procedure for environmental evaluation of an international distribution center. Information Sciences, 178(2), 531–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Løken, E., & Botterud, A. (2005). Planning of mixed local energy distribution systems: A comparison of two multi-criteria decision methods. Paper presented at the 28th Annual IAEE International Conference, Taipei, Taiwan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumüller, C., Kellner, F., Gupta, J. N., & Lasch, R. J. I. J. o. P. R. (2015). Integrating three-dimensional sustainability in distribution centre selection: The process analysis method-based analytic network process. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onstein, A. T., Ektesaby, M., Rezaei, J., Tavasszy, L. A., & van Damme, D. A. (2020). Importance of factors driving firms’ decisions on spatial distribution structures. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(1), 24–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ou, C.-W., & Chou, S.-Y. J. E. s. w. a. (2009). International distribution center selection from a foreign market perspective using a weighted fuzzy factor rating system. Expert systems with applications, 36(2), 1773–1782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, S., Dhanya, M., Gupta, N., & Kumar, A. (2012). Biofuels from biomass: A sustainable alternative to energy and environment. Biochemical and Cellular Archives, 12(2), 255–260.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J. J. O. (2016). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model. Omega, 64, 126–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei, J., Papakonstantinou, A., Tavasszy, L., Pesch, U., & Kana, A. (2019). Sustainable product-package design in a food supply chain: A multi-criteria life cycle approach. Packaging Technology and Science, 32(2), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saini, J. K., Agrawal, R., Satlewal, A., Saini, R., Gupta, R., Mathur, A., & Tuli, D. (2015). Second generation bioethanol production at high gravity of pilot-scale pretreated wheat straw employing newly isolated thermotolerant yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus DBTIOC-35. RSC Advances, 5(47), 37485–37494.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Santibañez-Aguilar, J. E., González-Campos, J. B., Ponce-Ortega, J. M., Serna-González, M., & El-Halwagi, M. M. (2014). Optimal planning and site selection for distributed multiproduct biorefineries involving economic, environmental and social objectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 270–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Kaa, G., Fens, T., & Rezaei, J. (2019). Residential grid storage technology battles: A multi-criteria analysis using BWM. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(1), 40–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-J., & Kao, C.-S. (2007). Applying fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making method to select the distribution center. Paper presented at the fskd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M.-H., Lee, H.-S., Chu, C.-W. J. I. J. O. I. C., & Information, & Control. (2010). Evaluation of logistic distribution center selection using the fuzzy MCDM approach. International Journal of Innovative Computing, Information and Control, 6(12), 5785–5796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., Ma, X.-l., Wang, Y.-h., Mao, H.-j., & Zhang, Y. (2012). Location optimization of multiple distribution centers under fuzzy environment. Journal of Zhejiang University Science A, 13(10), 782–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoruklu, H. C., Koroglu, E. O., Demir, A., & Ozkaya, B. (2019). The electromotive-induced regulation of anaerobic fermentation: Electrofermentation. In Microbial electrochemical technology (pp. 739–756). Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siamak Kheybari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kheybari, S., Pooya, A. (2021). Location Selection of Bioethanol Distribution Centers. In: Rezaei, J. (eds) Strategic Decision Making for Sustainable Management of Industrial Networks. Greening of Industry Networks Studies, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55385-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics