Abstract
The Atlantic forest biome is a key provider of ecosystem services (ES) delivered worldwide. The region presents a complex history of land use changes based on human demands that have decreased its native vegetation and the potential to integrate biodiversity and human wellbeing. In this chapter, we described the profile of the scientific output on ES for the Atlantic forest; the spatial patterns of ES; projected scenarios, particularly considering the potential for ecosystem restoration; and the profile of public policies and private practices based on ES in the region. We emphasize that the integration of multiple strategies that fill the knowledge gaps, identify local demands and trade-offs, and promote dialogue between multiple sectors will be key to ensure the provisioning of ES in the Atlantic Forest in the coming years.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Law number 12.651, 2012.
References
Adams C, Seroa da Motta R, Ortiz RA, Reid J, Ebersbach Aznar C, de Almeida Sinisgalli PA (2008) The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil). Ecol Econ 66:359–370
Alarcon GG, Ayanu Y, Fantini AC, Farley J, Filho AS, Koellner T (2015) Weakening the Brazilian legislation for forest conservation has severe impacts for ecosystem services in the Atlantic Southern Forest. Land Use Policy 47:1–11
Aleixo KP, de Faria LB, Groppo M, do Castro MMN, da Silva CI (2014) Spatiotemporal distribution of floral resources in a Brazilian city: implications for the maintenance of pollinators, especially bees. Urban For Urban Green 13:689–696
Alexander S, Aronson J, Whaley O, Lamb D (2016) The relationship between ecological restoration and the ecosystem services concept. Ecol Soc 21:art34
Alves-Pinto HN, Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN, Barros FSM, Sansevero JBB, Iribarrem A, Crouzeilles R, Lemgruber L, Rangel MC, Silva ACP (2017) Reconciling rural development and ecological restoration: strategies and policy recommendations for the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Land Use Policy 60:419–426
Amazonas NT, Martinelli LA, Piccolo M d C, Rodrigues RR (2011) Nitrogen dynamics during ecosystem development in tropical forest restoration. For Ecol Manag 262:1551–1557
Audino LD, Murphy SJ, Zambaldi L, Louzada J, Comita LS (2017) Drivers of community assembly in tropical forest restoration sites: role of local environment, landscape, and space. Ecol Appl 27:1731–1745
Banks-Leite C, Pardini R, Tambosi LR, Pearse WD, Bueno AA, Bruscagin RT, Condez TH, Dixo M, Igari AT, Martensen AC, Metzger JP (2014) Using ecological thresholds to evaluate the costs and benefits of set-asides in a biodiversity hotspot. Science 345:1041–1045
Batistella M, Bolfe EL, De Victoria DC, De Custodio DO, Da Silva GBS, Drucker DP (2012) SOMABRASIL: Sistema de Observação e Monitoramento da Agricultura no Brasil. Comunicado Técnico 29. Embrapa, Campinas-SP
Begotti RA, dos Pacífico ES, de Ferraz SFB, Galetti M (2018) Landscape context of plantation forests in the conservation of tropical mammals. J Nat Conserv 41:97–105
Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundill G, Díaz S, Egoh BN, Geijzendorffer IR, Krug CB, Lavorel S, Lazos E, Lebel L, Martín-López B, Meyfroidt P, Mooney HA, Nel JL, Pascual U, Payet K, Harguindeguy NP, Peterson GD, Prieur-Richard AH, Reyers B, Roebeling P, Seppelt R, Solan M, Tschakert P, Tscharntke T, Turner BL, Verburg PH, Viglizzo EF, White PCL, Woodward G (2015) Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:76–85
Bernard E, Penna LAO, Araújo E (2014) Downgrading, downsizing, Degazettement, and reclassification of protected areas in Brazil. Conserv Biol 28:939–950
Blangy S, Mehta H (2006) Ecotourism and ecological restoration. J Nat Conserv 14:233–236
BPBES (2019) 1° Diagnóstico Brasileiro de Biodiversidade e Serviços Ecossistêmicos. Joly CA; Scarano FR; Seixas CS; Metzger JP; Ometto JP; Bustamante MMC; Padgurschi MCG; Pires APF; Castro PFD; Gadda T; Toledo P (eds.) Editora Cubo, São Carlos pp.178
Braat LC, de Groot R (2012) The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst Serv 1:4–15
Brancalion PHS, Melo FPL, Tabarelli M, Rodrigues RR (2013) Biodiversity persistence in highly human-modified tropical landscapes depends on ecological restoration. Trop Conserv Sci 6:705–710
Brancalion PHS, Cardozo IV, Camatta A, Aronson J, Rodrigues RR (2014) Cultural ecosystem services and popular perceptions of the benefits of an ecological restoration project in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Restor Ecol 22:65–71
Brancalion PHS, Garcia LC, Loyola R, Rodrigues RR, Pillar VD, Lewinsohn TM (2016) A critical analysis of the native vegetation protection law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Natureza e Conservacao 14:1–16
Buainain AM, Alves E, Silveira JM, Navarro Z (2014) O mundo rural no Brasil do século 21: a formação de um novo padrão agrário e agrícola. Embrapa, Brasília
Bufalo FS, Galetti M, Culot L (2016) Seed dispersal by Primates and implications for the conservation of a biodiversity hotspot, the Atlantic Forest of South America. Int J Primatol 37:333–349
Bullock JM, Aronson J, Newton AC, Pywell RF, Rey-Benayas JM (2011) Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol Evol 26:541–549
Bunge M (2003) Emergence and convergence: qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Campos FS, Lourenço-de-Moraes R, Llorente GA, Solé M (2017) Cost-effective conservation of amphibian ecology and evolution. Sci Adv 3:e1602929
Cao V, Margni M, Favis BD, Deschênes L (2015) Aggregated indicator to assess land use impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA) based on the economic value of ecosystem services. J Clean Prod 94:56–66
Chan KMA, Satterfield T, Goldstein J (2012) Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ 74:8–18
Chazdon RL, Broadbent EN, Rozendaal DMA, Bongers F, Zambrano AMA, Aide TM, Balvanera P, Becknell JM, Boukili V, Brancalion PHS, Craven D, Almeida-Cortez JS, Cabral GAL, de Jong B, Denslow JS, Dent DH, DeWalt SJ, Dupuy JM, Duran SM, Espirito-Santo MM, Fandino MC, Cesar RG, Hall JS, Hernandez-Stefanoni JL, Jakovac CC, Junqueira AB, Kennard D, Letcher SG, Lohbeck M, Martinez-Ramos M, Massoca P, Meave JA, Mesquita R, Mora F, Munoz R, Muscarella R, Nunes YRF, Ochoa-Gaona S, Orihuela-Belmonte E, Pena-Claros M, Perez-Garcia EA, Piotto D, Powers JS, Rodriguez-Velazquez J, Romero-Perez IE, Ruiz J, Saldarriaga JG, Sanchez-Azofeifa A, Schwartz NB, Steininger MK, Swenson NG, Uriarte M, van Breugel M, van der Wal H, Veloso MDM, Vester H, Vieira ICG, Bentos TV, Williamson GB, Poorter L (2016) Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics. Sci Adv 2:e1501639
Correia RA, Jepson PR, Malhado ACM, Ladle RJ (2016) Familiarity breeds content: assessing bird species popularity with culturomics. PeerJ 4:e1728
Costanza R, Arge R, De Groot R, Farberk S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, Neill RVO, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Suttonkk P (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260
Costanza R, de Groot R, Braat L, Kubiszewski I, Fioramonti L, Sutton P, Farber S, Grasso M (2017) Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go? Ecosyst Serv 28:1–16
Crouzat E, Arpin I, Brunet L, Colloff MJ, Turkelboom F, Lavorel S (2018) Researchers must be aware of their roles at the interface of ecosystem services science and policy. Ambio 47:97–105
d’Albertas F, Costa K, Romitelli I, Barbosa JM, Vieira SA, Metzger JP (2018) Lack of evidence of edge age and additive edge effects on carbon stocks in a tropical forest. For Ecol Manag 407:57–65
Daily GC (2000) The value of nature and the nature of value. Science 289:395–396
de Groot RS (1987) Environmental functions as a unifying concept for ecology and economics. Environmentalist 7:105–109
de Groot R, Sukhdev P, Gough M (2018) Biodiversity: sparring makes us strong. Nature 561:309–309
De Marco P, Coelho FM (2004) Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures’ pollination and production. Biodivers Conserv 13:1245–1255
de Souza HN, de Graaff J, Pulleman MM (2012) Strategies and economics of farming systems with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome. Agrofor Syst 84:227–242
de Souza SEXF, Vidal E, Chagas G d F, Elgar AT, Brancalion PHS (2016) Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48:868–881
Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, Bartuska A, Baste IA, Bilgin A, Brondizio E, Chan KMA, Figueroa VE, Duraiappah A, Fischer M, Hill R, Koetz T, Leadley P, Lyver P, Mace GM, Martin-Lopez B, Okumura M, Pacheco D, Pascual U, Pérez ES, Reyers B, Roth E, Saito O, Scholes RJ, Sharma N, Tallis H, Thaman R, Watson R, Yahara T, Hamid ZA, Akosim C, Al-Hafedh Y, Allahverdiyev R, Amankwah E, Asah TS, Asfaw Z, Bartus G, Brooks AL, Caillaux J, Dalle G, Darnaedi D, Driver A, Erpul G, Escobar-Eyzaguirre P, Failler P, Fouda AMM, Fu B, Gundimeda H, Hashimoto S, Homer F, Lavorel S, Lichtenstein G, Mala WA, Mandivenyi W, Matczak P, Mbizvo C, Mehrdadi M, Metzger JP, Mikissa JB, Moller H, Mooney HA, Mumby P, Nagendra H, Nesshover C, Oteng-Yeboah AA, Pataki G, Roué M, Rubis J, Schultz M, Smith P, Sumaila R, Takeuchi K, Thomas S, Verma M, Yeo-Chang Y, Zlatanova D (2015) The IPBES conceptual framework – connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:1–16
Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, Polasky S, Church A, Lonsdale M, Larigauderie A, Leadley PW, van Oudenhoven APE, van der Plaat F, Schröter M, Lavorel S, Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y, Bukvareva E, Davies K, Demissew S, Erpul G, Failler P, Guerra CA, Hewitt CL, Keune H, Lindley S, Shirayama Y (2018) Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359:270–272
Duarte GT, Ribeiro MC, Paglia AP (2016) Ecosystem services modeling as a tool for defining priority areas for conservation. PLoS One 11:e0154573
Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich A (1981). Extinction: the causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Page (R. House, Ed.). New York
Ehrlich PR, Mooney HA (1983) Extinction, substitution, ecosystem services. BioScience 33:248–254
Fernandes GW, Goulart FF, Ranieri BD, Coelho MS, Dales K, Boesche N, Bustamante M, Carvalho FA, Carvalho DC, Dirzo R, Fernandes S, Galetti PM, Millan VEG, Mielke C, Ramirez JL, Neves A, Rogass C, Ribeiro SP, Scariot A, Soares-Filho B (2016) Deep into the mud: ecological and socio-economic impacts of the dam breach in Mariana, Brazil. Natureza & Conservação 14:35–45
Ferraro PJ, Hanauer MM, Miteva DA, Nelson JL, Pattanayak SK, Nolte C, Sims KRE (2015) Estimating the impacts of conservation on ecosystem services and poverty by integrating modeling and evaluation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:7420–7425
Filoso S, do Carmo JB, Mardegan SF, Lins SRM, Gomes TF, Martinelli LA (2015) Reassessing the environmental impacts of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil to help meet sustainability goals. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:1847–1856
Filoso S, Bezerra MO, Weiss KCB, Palmer MA (2017) Impacts of forest restoration on water yield: a systematic review. PLoS One 12:e0183210
Fonseca MM, Lima E, Lemos F, Venzon M, Janssen A (2017) Non-crop plant to attract and conserve an aphid predator (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in tomato. Biol Control 115:129–134
Förster J, Barkmann J, Fricke R, Hotes S, Kleyer M, Kobbe S, Kübler D, Rumbaur C, Siegmund-Schultze M, Seppelt R, Settele J, Spangenberg JH, Tekken V, Václavík T, Wittmer H (2015) Assessing ecosystem services for informing land-use decisions: a problem-oriented approach. Ecol Soc 20:art31
França JUB, Lamano-Ferreira AP d N, Ruiz MS, Quaresma CC, Kniess CT, Ramos HR, Ferreira ML (2016) Ecological knowledge about protected areas in the east zone of São Paulo, SP: implications for sustainability in urban area. HOLOS 3:174
Friess DA, Webb EL (2014) Variability in mangrove change estimates and implications for the assessment of ecosystem service provision. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:715–725
Galetti M, Brocardo CR, Begotti RA, Hortenci L, Rocha-Mendes F, Bernardo CSS, Bueno RS, Nobre R, Bovendorp RS, Marques RM, Meirelles F, Gobbo SK, Beca G, Schmaedecke G, Siqueira T (2017) Defaunation and biomass collapse of mammals in the largest Atlantic forest remnant. Anim Conserv 20:270–281
Gardner TA, Hernández MIM, Barlow J, Peres CA (2007) Understanding the biodiversity consequences of habitat change: the value of secondary and plantation forests for neotropical dung beetles. J Appl Ecol 45:883–893
Gaston KJ, Jackson SF, Cantú-Salazar L, Cruz-Piñón G (2008) The ecological performance of protected areas. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 39:93–113
Giannini TC, Tambosi LR, Acosta AL, Jaffé R, Saraiva AM, Imperatriz-Fonseca VL, Metzger JP (2015) Safeguarding ecosystem services: a methodological framework to buffer the joint effect of habitat configuration and climate change. PLoS One 10:e0129225
Gómez-Baggethun E, de Groot R, Lomas PL, Montes C (2010) The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol Econ 69:1209–1218
Gomiero T, Paoletti MG, Pimentel D (2010) Biofuels: efficiency, ethics, and limits to human appropriation of ecosystem services. J Agric Environ Ethics 23:403–434
Güneralp B, Seto KC (2013) Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation. Environ Res Lett 8
Helliwell DR (1969) Valuation of wildlife resources. Reg Stud 3:41–47
Hengl T, De Jesus JM, MacMillan RA, Batjes NH, Heuvelink GBM, Ribeiro E, Samuel-Rosa A, Kempen B, Leenaars JGB, Walsh MG, Gonzalez MR (2014) SoilGrids1km – global soil information based on automated mapping. PLoS One 9
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978
Hipólito J, Boscolo D, Viana BF (2018) Landscape and crop management strategies to conserve pollination services and increase yields in tropical coffee farms. Agric Ecosyst Environ 256:218–225
Instituto Saúde e Sustentabilidade (2018) Um minuto de ar limpo
Instituto Trata Brasil (2018) Benefícios econômicos e sociais da expansão do saneamento no Brasil
Ishihara H (2018) Relational values from a cultural valuation perspective: how can sociology contribute to the evaluation of ecosystem services? Curr Opin Environ Sustain 35:61–68
Jenkins CN, Alves MAS, Uezu A, Vale MM (2015) Patterns of Vertebrate Diversity and Protection in Brazil. PLOS ONE 10(12):e0145064.
Joly CA, Metzger JP, Tabarelli M (2014) Experiences from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: ecological findings and conservation initiatives. New Phytol 204:459–473
Jordani MX, Hasui É, da Silva VX (2015) Natural enemies depend on remnant habitat size in agricultural landscapes. J For Res 26:469–477
Kennedy CM, Hawthorne PL, Miteva DA, Baumgarten L, Sochi K, Matsumoto M, Evans JS, Polasky S, Hamel P, Vieira EM, Develey PF, Sekercioglu CH, Davidson AD, Uhlhorn EM, Kiesecker J (2016) Optimizing land use decision-making to sustain Brazilian agricultural profits, biodiversity and ecosystem services. Biol Conserv 204:221–230
Kremer LP, da Rocha RM (2016) The biotic resistance role of fish predation in fouling communities. Biol Invasions 18:3223–3237
Lacerda AEB (2016) Conservation strategies for Araucaria Forests in Southern Brazil: assessing current and alternative approaches. Biotropica 48:537–544
Lamb D (2005) Restoration of degraded tropical forest landscapes. Science 310:1628–1632
Latawiec AE, Strassburg BBN, Brancalion PHS, Rodrigues RR, Gardner T (2015) Creating space for large-scale restoration in tropical agricultural landscapes. Front Ecol Environ 13:211–218
Librán-Embid F, De Coster G, Metzger JP (2017) Effects of bird and bat exclusion on coffee pest control at multiple spatial scales. Landsc Ecol 32:1907–1920
Lyra A, Tavares P, Chou SC, Sueiro G, Dereczynski C, Sondermann M, Silva A, Marengo J, Giarolla A (2017) Climate change projections over three metropolitan regions in Southeast Brazil using the non-hydrostatic Eta regional climate model at 5-km resolution. Theor Appl Climatol:1–20
Maes J, Burkhard B, Geneletti D (2018) Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values. A comment on the concept of nature’s contributions to people. One Ecosyst 3:e24720
Magnago LFS, Magrach A, Laurance WF, Martins SV, Meira-Neto JAA, Simonelli M, Edwards DP (2015) Would protecting tropical forest fragments provide carbon and biodiversity cobenefits under REDD+? Glob Chang Biol 21:3455–3468
Masood E (2018) The battle for the soul of biodiversity. Nature 560:423–425
MEA (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment: ecosystems and human well-being, Washington, DC
Medeiros R, Young CEF, Pavese HB, Araújo FFS (2011) Contribuição das Unidades de Conservação Brasileira para a Economia Nacional: Sumário Executivo. UNEP-WCMC. 44 p. Brasília
MMA (2015) Shapefile of conservation units of Brazil
Molin PG, Gergel SE, Silvio BSS (2017) Spatial determinants of Atlantic Forest loss and recovery in Brazil. Landsc Ecol 32:857–870
Moreira EF, Boscolo D, Viana BF (2015) Spatial heterogeneity regulates plant-pollinator networks across multiple landscape scales. PLoS One 10:e0123628
Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm TR, Ricketts TH (2008) Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:9495–9500
Nobre CA, Marengo JA, Seluchi ME, Cuartas LA, Alves LM (2016) Some characteristics and impacts of the drought and water crisis in Southeastern Brazil during 2014 and 2015. J Water Res Protect 08:252–262
Oliveira-Silva LRB, Campêlo AC, Lima IMS, Araújo ACL, Bezerra BM, Souza-Alves JP (2018) Can a non-native primate be a potential seed disperser? A case study on Saimiri sciureus in Pernambuco state, Brazil. Folia Primatol 89:138–149
Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Başak Dessane E, Islar M, Kelemen E, Maris V, Quaas M, Subramanian SM, Wittmer H, Adlan A, Ahn SE, Al-Hafedh YS, Amankwah E, Asah ST, Berry P, Bilgin A, Breslow SJ, Bullock C, Cáceres D, Daly-Hassen H, Figueroa E, Golden CD, Gómez-Baggethun E, González-Jiménez D, Houdet J, Keune H, Kumar R, Ma K, May PH, Mead A, O’Farrell P, Pandit R, Pengue W, Pichis-Madruga R, Popa F, Preston S, Pacheco-Balanza D, Saarikoski H, Strassburg BB, van den Belt M, Verma M, Wickson F, Yagi N (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26–27:7–16
Peterson GD, Harmáčková ZV, Meacham M, Queiroz C, Jiménez-Aceituno A, Kuiper JJ, Malmborg K, Sitas N, Bennett EM (2018) Welcoming different perspectives in IPBES: “nature’s contributions to people” and “ecosystem services”. Ecol Soc 23(1):39
Petz K, Alkemade R, Bakkenes M, Schulp CJE, van der Velde M, Leemans R (2014) Mapping and modelling trade-offs and synergies between grazing intensity and ecosystem services in rangelands using global-scale datasets and models. Glob Environ Chang 29:223–234
Pires APF, Rezende CL, Assad ED, Loyola R, Scarano FR (2017) Forest restoration can increase the Rio Doce watershed resilience. Perspect Ecol Conserv 15:187–193
Pires APF, Amaral AG, Padgurschi MCG, Joly CA, Scarano FR (2018) Biodiversity research still falls short of creating links with ecosystem services and human well-being in a global hotspot. Ecosyst Serv 34:68–73
Pires APF, Padgurschi MCG, de Castro PD, Scarano FR, Strassburg B, Joly CA, Watson RT, de Groot R (2020) Ecosystem services or nature’s contributions? Reasons behind different interpretations in Latin America. Ecosyst Serv 42:101070
Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:5242–5247
Raymundo D, Prado-Junior J, de Oliveira-Neto NE, Santana LD, do Vale VS, Jacobson TB, de Oliveira PEAM, Carvalho FA (2018) Persistence of Coffea arabica and its relationship with the structure, species diversity and composition of a secondary forest in Brazil. PLoS One 13:e0194032
Rey Benayas JM, Newton AC, Diaz A, Bullock JM (2009) Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325:1121–1124
Rezende CL, Uezu A, Scarano FR, Araujo DSD (2015) Atlantic Forest spontaneous regeneration at landscape scale. Biodivers Conserv 24:2255–2272
Rezende CL, Fraga JS, Sessa JC, de Souza GVP, Assad ED, Scarano FR, Linhares C, Stingel J, Cabral J, Vinagre G, De Souza P, Delgado E, Rubio F, Rezende CL, Fraga JS, Sessa JC, de Souza GVP, Assad ED, Scarano FR (2018a) Land use policy as a driver for climate change adaptation: a case in the domain of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Land Use Policy 72:563–569
Rezende CL, Scarano FR, Assad ED, Joly CA, Metzger JP, Tabarelli M, Fonseca GA, Mittermeier RA (2018b) From hotspot to hopespot: an opportunity for the Brazilian Atlantic. Perspect Ecol Conserv 16:208–214
Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP, Martensen AC, Ponzoni FJ, Hirota MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: how much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 142:1141–1153
Ribeiro MC, Martensen AC, Metzger JP, Tabarelli M, Scarano FR, Fortin MJ (2011) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: a shrinking biodiversity hotspot. pp. 405–434. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (eds) Biodiversity hotspots. Springer, Heidelberg
Richards RC, Rerolle J, Aronson J, Pereira PH, Gonçalves H, Brancalion PHS (2015) Governing a pioneer program on payment for watershed services: stakeholder involvement, legal frameworks and early lessons from the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Ecosyst Serv 16:23–32
Richards RC, Kennedy CJ, Lovejoy TE, Brancalion PHS (2017) Considering farmer land use decisions in efforts to ‘scale up’ payments for watershed services. Ecosyst Serv 23:238–247
Rieb JT, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Armsworth PR, Böhning-Gaese K, Bonn A, Cumming GS, Eigenbrod F, Grimm V, Jackson BM, Marques A, Pattanayak SK, Pereira HM, Peterson GD, Ricketts TH, Robinson BE, Schröter M, Schulte LA, Seppelt R, Turner MG, Bennett EM (2017) When, where, and how nature matters for ecosystem services: challenges for the next generation of ecosystem service models. Bioscience 67:820–833
Robinson SJB, van den Berg E, Meirelles GS, Ostle N (2015) Factors influencing early secondary succession and ecosystem carbon stocks in Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biodivers Conserv 24:2273–2291
Rocha-Santos L, Pessoa MS, Cassano CR, Talora DC, Orihuela RLL, Mariano-Neto E, Morante-Filho JC, Faria D, Cazetta E (2016) The shrinkage of a forest: landscape-scale deforestation leading to overall changes in local forest structure. Biol Conserv 196:1–9
Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA, Revolution I (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475
Ruesch, A, Gibbs, H (2008) IPCC Tier-1 Global Biomass Carbon Map for the Year 2000. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, http://cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov
Ruiz-Mallén I, Schunko C, Corbera E, Rös M, Reyes-García V (2015) Meanings, drivers, and motivations for community-based conservation in Latin America. Ecol Soc 20:art33
Sacchi LV, Powell PA, Gasparri NI, Grau R (2017) Air quality loss in urban centers of the Argentinean Dry Chaco: wind and dust control as two scientifically neglected ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 24:234–240
Santos HV, Scotti MR (2018) Riparian reforestation with a single exotic species restores soil aggregation and porosity but not humic substances. Soil Use Manag 34:124–133
Sarmento R, Alves-Costa CP, Ayub A, Mello MAR (2014) Partitioning of seed dispersal services between birds and bats in a fragment of the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Zoologia (Curitiba) 31:245–255
Saturni FT, Jaffé R, Metzger JP (2016) Landscape structure influences bee community and coffee pollination at different spatial scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ 235:1–12
Scarano FR (2019a) Biodiversity Sector: Risks of Temperature Increase to Biodiversity and Ecosystems. In: Nobre C., Marengo J., Soares W. (eds) Climate Change Risks in Brazil. Springer, Cham
Scarano FR (2019b) The emergence of sustainability. pp. 51–71. In: Wegner L, Lüttge U (eds) Emergence and modularity in life sciences. Springer, Cham
Scarano FR (2017) Ecosystem-based adaptation to climate change: concept, scalability and a role for conservation science. Perspect Ecol Conserv 15:65–73
Scarano FR, Ceotto P (2015) Brazilian Atlantic forest: impact, vulnerability and adaptation to climate change. Biodivers Conserv 24:2319–2331
Shimamoto CY, Botosso PC, Marques MCM (2014) How much carbon is sequestered during the restoration of tropical forests? Estimates from tree species in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For Ecol Manag 329:1–9
Shimamoto CY, Padial AA, Da Rosa CM, Marques MCM (2018) Restoration of ecosystem services in tropical forests: a global meta-analysis. PLoS One 13:1–16
Soares-Filho B, Rajão R, Merry F, Rodrigues H, Davis J, Lima L, Macedo M, Coe M, Carneiro A, Santiago L (2016) Brazil’s market for trading forest certificates. PLoS One 11:e0152311
Sone JS, Gesualdo GC, Zamboni PAP, Vieira NOM, Mattos TS, Carvalho GA, Rodrigues DBB, Sobrinho TA, Oliveira PTS (2019) Water provisioning improvement through payment for ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 655:1197–1206
SOSMA (2014) Atlas dos remanescentes florestais da Mata Atlântica período 2013–2014
Sovacool BK (2011) Using ecosystem valuation to protect the Atlantic rainforest: the case of the oasis project. Soc Nat Resour 24:1096–1104
Strassburg BBN, Latawiec AE, Barioni LG, Nobre CA, da Silva VP, Valentim JF, Vianna M, Assad ED (2014) When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Glob Environ Chang 28:84–97
Strassburg BBN, Barros FSM, Crouzeilles R, Iribarrem A, dos Santos JS, Silva D, Sansevero JBB, Alves-Pinto HN, Feltran-Barbieri R, Latawiec AE (2016) The role of natural regeneration to ecosystem services provision and habitat availability: a case study in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 48:890–899
Strassburg BBN, Beyer HL, Crouzeilles R, Iribarrem A, Barros F, de Siqueira MF, Sánchez-Tapia A, Balmford A, Sansevero JBB, Brancalion PHS, Broadbent EN, Chazdon RL, Filho AO, Gardner TA, Gordon A, Latawiec A, Loyola R, Metzger JP, Mills M, Possingham HP, Rodrigues RR, de Scaramuzza CAM, Scarano FR, Tambosi L, Uriarte M (2019) Strategic approaches to restoring ecosystems can triple conservation gains and halve costs. Nat Ecol Evol 3:62–70
Tabarelli M, Aguiar AV, Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP (2012) The conversion of the Atlantic Forest in anthropogenic landscapes: lessons for the conservation of biological diversity of tropical forests. Interciência 37:88–92
Taffarello D, Samprogna Mohor G, do Carmo Calijuri M, Mendiondo EM (2016) Field investigations of the 2013–14 drought through quali-quantitative freshwater monitoring at the headwaters of the Cantareira System, Brazil. Water Int 41:776–800
Tambosi LR, Martensen AC, Ribeiro MC, Metzger JP (2014) A framework to optimize biodiversity restoration efforts based on habitat amount and landscape connectivity. Restor Ecol 22:169–177
Torres S, Moran E, Silva R (2017) Property rights and the soybean Revolution: shaping how China and Brazil are Telecoupled. Sustainability 9:954
Trabucco A, Zomer RJ (2010) Global Soil Water Balance Geospatial Database
Tscharntke T, Clough Y, Bhagwat SA, Buchori D, Faust H, Hertel D, Hölscher D, Juhrbandt J, Kessler M, Perfecto I, Scherber C, Schroth G, Veldkamp E, Wanger TC (2011) Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes – a review. J Appl Ecol 48:619–629
Turetta APD, Tonucci R, De Mattos LM, Amaro G, de Balieiro FC, Prado RB, de Souza HA, de Oliveira AP (2016) An approach to assess the potential of agroecosystems in providing environmental services. Pesq Agrop Brasileira 51:1051–1060
Vitule J, Bornatowski H, Freire C, Abilhoa V (2014) Extralimital introductions of Salminus brasiliensis (Cuvier, 1816) (Teleostei, Characidae) for sport fishing purposes: a growing challenge for the conservation of biodiversity in neotropical aquatic ecosystems. BioInvasions Records 3:291–296
Wolowski M, Agostini K, Rech AR, Varassin IG, Maués M, Freitas L, Carneiro LT, de Bueno RO, Consolaro H, Carvalheiro L, Saraiva AM, da Silva CI (2019) Relatório temático sobre polinização, polinizadores e produção de alimentos no Brasil. Editora Cubo, São Carlos
Young CEF, de Bakker LB (2014) Payments for ecosystem services from watershed protection: a methodological assessment of the oasis project in Brazil. Natureza a Conservacao 12:71–78
Zwiener VP, Padial AA, Marques MCM, Faleiro FV, Loyola R, Peterson AT (2017) Planning for conservation and restoration under climate and land use change in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Divers Distrib:1–12
Acknowledgments
APFP, MP, and FRS thank the Brazilian Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (BPBES), funded by CNPq Grant Number 405593/2015-5 and BIOTA-Fapesp; MCMM and CYS thank Fundação Grupo Boticário (Grant A0004_2012) for sponsoring the project “Ecosystem Services in Atlantic Forest”. MCMM also thanks CNPq (grant #303897/2016-3).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pires, A.P.F., Shimamoto, C.Y., Padgurschi, M.C.G., Scarano, F.R., Marques, M.C.M. (2021). Atlantic Forest: Ecosystem Services Linking People and Biodiversity. In: Marques, M.C.M., Grelle, C.E.V. (eds) The Atlantic Forest. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55322-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55322-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55321-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55322-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)