Skip to main content

Interviewing and Interrogating

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Correctional Assessment, Casework, and Counseling

Abstract

Correctional workers spend a large portion of their time conducting interviews with offenders, victims, police officers, and many other people involved in some way with offenders’ activities. During the course of their work, correctional workers may also be required to interrogate offenders. Thus, this chapter presents the basic principles of effective interviewing and interrogating. The chapter begins with a discussion of the PEACE model of interviewing, which explains the interview process from beginning to end. Next, the techniques of effective interviewing are presented, including active listening, alertness, questioning and probing, resisting temptations to interrupt, and keeping the offender in the foreground. We also discuss techniques to respond to offenders’ disclosure. Next, we discuss how to interview victims (as opposed to offenders) and the factors that should be considered when interviewing this population. We then discuss interrogating offenders, including the differences between interviewing and interrogation, qualities of effective interrogators, types of questions to ask, and effective strategies to obtain information from reluctant offenders. The chapter concludes with an exercise in interviewing and listening. The main purpose of this interview exercise is to develop your ability to listen actively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, R. (2000). Counseling, treatment, and intervention methods with juvenile and adult offenders. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berne, E. (1964). Games people play. New York, NY: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braken, D. (2003). Skills and knowledge for contemporary probation practice. Probation Journal, 50, 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. (2007). Motivational interviewing for probation officers: Tipping the balance toward change. Federal Probation, 70, 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell, K., Hiscock, C., & Memon, A. (2002). Interviewing techniques and the assessment of statement credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Englebrecht, C., & Chavez, J. (2014). Whose statement is it? An examination of victim impact statements delivered in court. Victims & Offenders, 9, 386–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorden, R. (1992). Basic interviewing techniques. Itasca, IL: F.E. Peacock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goyer, R., Redding, C., & Rickey, J. (1968). Interviewing principles and techniques. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. (1994). Investigative interviewing: Recent developments and some fundamental issues. International Journal of Psychiatry, 6, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, H. (1978). Basic psychiatry for corrections workers. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbau, F., & Reid, J. (1985). Criminal interrogations and confessions. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivey, A. (1983). Intentional interviewing and counseling. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S., Leo, R., Meissner, C., Richman, K., Colwell, L., Leach, A., & La Fon, D. (2007). Police interviewing and interrogation: A self-report survey of police practices and beliefs. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 381–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, M., & Adams, S. (1998). Magic words to obtain confessions. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 67, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, J. (2003). A four-domain model of detecting deception: An alternative paradigm for inter-viewing. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 72, 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reik, T. (1956). Listening with the third ear. New York, NY: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Deaton, 468 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Unwin, C. (1978). Interrogation techniques. Police Review, 85, 1874–1877.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessel, D. (1998). Conducting successful interrogations. Law Enforcement Bulletin, 67, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A. (2006). Challenging interviewees during interviews: The potential effects on lie detection. Psychology Crime and Law, 12, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrij, A., Mann, S., & Fisher, R. (2006). Information gathering vs accusatory interview style: Individual differences in respondent’s experiences. Psychology Crime and Law, 12, 193–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (1986). Placebo justice: Victim recommendations and offender sentences in sexual assault cases. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 1126–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

3.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Data 3.1

(PPTX 66 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Walsh, A., Wells, J., Gann, S.M. (2020). Interviewing and Interrogating. In: Correctional Assessment, Casework, and Counseling. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55226-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics