Advertisement

Theories of Internationalization and Foreign Direct Investment: How to Explain FDI from Emerging MNEs?

Chapter
  • 68 Downloads
Part of the Studies in Economic Transition book series (SET)

Abstract

Szunomár offers a much-needed summary of the theoretical framework of foreign direct investment (FDI), as well as the concept of internationalization in order to show that traditional theories seem to be insufficient in explaining FDI decisions of emerging multinational enterprises (MNEs). After briefly presenting the traditional theories and the main findings of the Japanese school of FDI, the chapter continues with introducing the new theoretical attempts that try to explain the international expansion strategy of emerging MNEs, including driving forces and location choices. The author also explores the “specialties” the emerging countries possess, such as the essential function of home-country governments in promoting outward investment, the significance of institutions in influencing emerging MNEs’ behaviour and the outstanding role devoted to learning from others’ experiences.

Keywords

Outward foreign direct investment (outward FDI) Multinational enterprises (MNEs) Emerging markets Traditional theories Japanese school of FDI New theoretical attempts Push factors and pull factors of outward FDI 

References

  1. Akamatsu, K. (1962). A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries. The Developing Economics, 1(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amendolagine, V., & Rabellotti, R. (2017). Chinese Foreign Direct Investments in the European Union. In J. Drahokoupil (Ed.), Chinese Investment in Europe: Corporate Strategies and Labour Relations (pp. 99–120). Brussels: ETUI.Google Scholar
  3. Andreosso-O’Callaghan, B. (2016). Emerging Asian Economies and MNCs Strategies—A Review of the Literature. In Taylor & B. Andreosso-O’Callaghan (Eds.), Emerging Asian Economies and MNCs Strategies. (Chap. 8, pp. 15–35). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anwar, A., & Mughal, M. Y. (2014). Why Do Russian Firms Invest Abroad? A Firm Level Analysis. MPRA Paper, No. 58178. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Retrieved from https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/58178/1/MPRA_paper_58178.pdf
  5. Barnard, H. (2010). Overcoming the Liability of Foreignness Without Strong Firm Capabilities: The Value of Market-based Resources. Journal of International Management, 16, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bevan, A. A., & Estrin, S. (2004). The Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment Into European Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 775–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blonigen, B. A., & Piger, J. (2014). Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment. Canadian Journal of Economics, 47(3), 775–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckley, P. J., Clegg, J., Cross, A. R., Liu, X., Voss, H., & Zheng, P. (2007). The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 499–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campos, N. F., & Kinoshita, Y. (2008). Foreign Direct Investment and Structural Reforms: Evidence from Eastern Europe and Latin America. IMF Working Paper 08/26.Google Scholar
  10. Carill-Caccia, F., & Pavlova, E. (2018). Foreign Direct Investment & Trade: A Global Value Chains Analysis. European Trade Study Group (ETSG) Papers, No. 276. Retrieved March 7, 2020, from https://www.etsg.org/ETSG2018/papers/276.pdf
  11. Carstensen, K., & Toubal, F. (2004). Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern European Countries: A Dynamic Panel Analysis. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Casanova, L., & Kassum, J. (2013). Brazilian Emerging Multinationals: In Search of a Second Wind. INSEAD Working Paper No. 2013/68/ST, May.Google Scholar
  13. Cuervo, J. C., & Pheng, L. S. (2003). Ownership Advantages/Disadvantages of Singapore Transnational Construction Corporations. Construction Management and Economics, 21, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunning, J. H. (1981). Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic and Development Approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117, 30–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunning, J. H. (1986). The Investment Development Cycle Revisited. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 122, 667–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunning, J. H. (1992). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Wokingham, UK: Addison-Wesley Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Dunning, J. H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  19. Dunning, J. H. (1997). Alliance Capitalism and Global Business. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dunning, J. H. (1998). Location and the Multinational Enterprise: A Neglected Factor? Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Institutions and the OLI Paradigm of the Multinational Enterprise. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 573–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dunning, J. H., & Narula, R. (1996). The Investment Development Path Revisited: Some Emerging Issues. In J. H. Dunning & R. Narula (Eds.), Foreign Direct Investment and Governments: Catalysts for Economic Restructuring. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Duran, J. J., & Úbeda, F. (2001). The Investment Development Path: A New Empirical Approach and Some Theoretical Issues. Transnational Corporations, 10(2), 1–34.Google Scholar
  24. Duran, J. J., & Úbeda, F. (2005). The Investment Development Path of Newly Developed Countries. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(1), 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fabry, N., & Zeghni, S. (2010). Inward FDI in Seven Transitional Countries of South-Eastern Europe: A Quest of Institution-based Attractiveness. Eastern Journal of European Studies, 1(2), 77–91.Google Scholar
  26. Feenstra, R. C. (1998). Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(4), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gubbi, S. R., Aulakh, P. S., Ray, S., Sarkar, M. B., & Chittoor, R. (2010). Do International Acquisitions by Emerging-Economy Firms Create Shareholder Value? The Case of Indian Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 397–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gubbi, S. R., & Sular, S. A. (2015). Why Do the Turkish Firms Invest in Mainland Europe? In L. Tihanyi, E. R. Banalieva, T. M. Devinney, & T. Pedersen (Eds.), Emerging Economies and Multinational Enterprises (Advances in International Management, Volume 28) (pp. 441–470). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  29. Hanemann, T. (2013, January 1). The EU-China Investment Relationship: From a One-Way to a Two-Way Street. New Europe Online. Retrieved August 17, 2017, from http://www.neurope.eu/kn/article/eu-china-investment-relationship-one-way-two-way-street
  30. Hijzen, A., Görg, H., & Manchin, M. (2008). Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions and the Role of Trade Costs. European Economic Review, 52(5), 849–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hymer, S. H. (1976). The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kalotay, K. (2010). The Future of Russian Outward Foreign Direct Investment and the Eclectic Paradigm: What Changes after the Crisis of 2008–2009? Competitio, 9(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kalotay, K., & Sulstarova, A. (2010). Modeling Russian Outward FDI. Journal of International Management, 16, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kawai, N. (2006). The Nature of Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in Eastern Central Europe. Japan aktuell—Journal of Current Japanese Affairs, 5, 3–41.Google Scholar
  35. Kojima, K. (1960). Capital Accumulation and the Course of Industrialisation, with Special Reference to Japan. The Economic Journal, LXX, 757–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kojima, K. (2000). The “Flying Geese” Model of Asian Economic Development: Origin, Theoretical Extensions, and Regional Policy Implications. Journal of Asian Economics, 11, 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational Legitimacy Under Conditions of Complexity: The Case of the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumagai, S. (2008). A Journey Through the Secret History of the Flying Geese Model. IDE Discussion Paper No. 158. Retrieved April 6, 2020, from https://www.ide.go.jp/English/Publish/Download/Dp/158.html
  39. Leitão, N. C., & Faustino, H. C. (2010). Portuguese Foreign Direct Investments Inflows: An Empirical Investigation. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 38, 190–197.Google Scholar
  40. Luo, Y., Xue, Q., & Han, B. (2010). How Emerging Market Governments Promote Outward FDI: Experience from China. Journal of World Business, 45(1), 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Madhok, A., & Keyhani, M. (2012). Acquisitions as Entrepreneurship: Asymmetries, Opportunities, and the Internationalization of Multinationals from Emerging Economies. Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Makino, S., Lau, C.-M., & Yeh, R.-S. (2002). Asset-Exploitation Versus Asset-Seeking: Implications for Location Choice of Foreign Direct Investment from Newly Industrialized Economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 403–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martínez-Galán, E., & Fontoura, M. P. (2018). Global Value Chains and Inward Foreign Direct Investment in the 2000s. The World Economy, 42(1), 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Masron, T. A., & Shahbudin, A. S. Md. (2008). ‘Push Factors’ of Outward FDI: Evidence from Malaysia and Thailand. Manuscript, Universiti of Sains, Malaysia. Retrieved May 4, 2010, from http://www.wbiconpro.com/468B-Arifin.pdf
  45. Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon Multinationals: New Players in 21st Century Globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meyer, K. E., & Nguyen, H. V. (2005). Foreign Investment Strategies and Sub-national Institutions in Emerging Markets: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1), 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nachum, L., & Zaheer, S. (2005). The Persistence of Distance? The Impact of Technology on MNE. Motivations for Foreign Investment. Strategic Management Journal, 26(8), 747–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ozawa, T. (2001). The “Hidden” Side of the “Flying-Geese” Catch-Up Model: Japan’s Dirigiste Institutional Setup and a Deepening Financial Morass. Journal of Asian Economics, 12, 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peng, M. W. (2012). The Global Strategy of Emerging Multinationals from China. Global Strategy Journal, 2, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ramachandran, J., & Pant, A. (2010). The Liabilities of Origin: An Emerging Economy Perspective on the Costs of Doing Business Abroad. In T. Devinney, T. Pedersen, & L. Tihanyi (Eds.), The Past, Present and Future of International Business and Management (pp. 231–265). New York: Emerald Group Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramamurti, R. (2012). What is Really Different About Emerging Market Multinationals? Global Strategy Journal, 2(1), 41–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ramamurti, R., & Singh, J. V. (2009). Indian Multinationals: Generic Internationalization Strategies. In R. Ramamurti & J. V. Singh (Eds.), Emerging Multinationals in Emerging Markets (pp. 110–166). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Resmini, L. (2005). FDI, Industry Location and Regional Development in New Member States and Candidate Countries: A Policy Perspective. Workpackage No. 4. The Impact of European Integration and Enlargement on Regional Structural Change and Cohesion, EURECO, 5th Framework Programme, European Commission.Google Scholar
  55. Ricz, J., & Szunomár, Á. (2019). Driving Forces Behind the International Expansion Strategies of Non-European EMNEs—A Comparative Analysis of the Chinese and Brazilian Cases. KÖZ-GAZDASÁG, 14(3), 168–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schüler-Zhou, Y., Schüller, M., & Brod, M. (2012). Push and Pull Factors for Chinese OFDI in Europe. In I. Alon, M. Fetscherin, & P. Gugler (Eds.), Chinese International Investments. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  57. Skolkovo. (2009). Global Expansion of Emerging Multinationals: Post-Crisis Adjustment. SIEMS Monthly Briefing, May. Skolkovo Institute for Emerging Market Studies. Retrieved from http://www.skolkovo.ru/images/stories/book/SIEMS_Monthly_Briefing_2009-05_eng.pdf
  58. Terpstra, V., & Yu, C. M. (1988). Determinants of Foreign Investment of US Advertising Agencies. Journal of International Business Studies, 19, 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tihanyi, L., Devinney, T. M., & Pedersen, T. (2012). Institutional Theory in International Business and Management (Advances in International Management, Vol. 25). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. UNCTAD. (2013). World Investment Report—Global Value Chains: Investment and Trade for Development. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  61. UNCTAD. (2015). World Investment Report—Reforming International Investment Governance. New York and Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  62. Vernon, R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Voss, H., Buckley, P. J., & Cross, A. R. (2009). An Assessment of the Effects of Institutional Change on Chinese Outward Direct Investment Activity. In I. Alon, J. Chang, M. Fetscherin, C. Lattemann, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), China Rules—Globalization and Political Transformation (pp. 135–165). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of World EconomicsCentre for Economic and Regional StudiesBudapestHungary
  2. 2.Institute of International, Political, and Regional SciencesCorvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations