Abstract
Do trade openness and import penetration regimes matter for the manufacturing sector output and employment growth in South Africa? Evidence indicates that both output and employment growth decline in response to positive trade openness and import penetration shocks. Trade openness and import penetration regimes matter for the manufacturing sector output and employment responses. The manufacturing sector output and employment decline sharply followed by a prolonged decline in the high trade openness and import penetration regimes compared to the low regimes. The high import penetration regime amplifies the adverse impact of the high trade openness regime. The import penetration ratio increases in response to positive shocks to the R/US$ appreciation, whereas it declines due to R/US$ exchange rate depreciation. The R/US$ exchange rate depreciation and appreciation shocks exert different effects on the manufacturing sector output and employment growth. The R/US$ exchange rate depreciation shocks amplify the impact of the low import penetration regimes shocks on the manufacturing sector output and employment growth. The policy implication is that there is case to lower the import penetration levels in order to support the manufacturing sector output and employment growth. Policymakers can pursue an exchange rate policy that facilitates the expenditure switching role of the exchange rate, the substitution between home and foreign traded goods and the adjustment of the trade account.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Devereux, M. B., & Engel, C. (2006). Expenditure Switching vs. Real Exchange Rate Stabilization Competing Objectives for Exchange Rate Policy. ECB Working Paper Series No. 614. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpwps/ecbwp614.pdf?e897f154ad95db5cd0b9af9351759550
Kelly, G., & La Cava, G. (2014). International Trade Costs, Global Supply Chains and Value-added Trade in Australia. Bank of Australia Research Discussion Paper 2014-07
Koopman, R., Powers, W., Wang, Z., & Wei, S.-J. (2010, September). NBER Working Paper No. 16426.
United States International Trade Commission. (2011). The Economic Effects of Significant US Import Restraints. Publication 4253. Retrieved from https://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/pub4253.pdf
Yi, K.-M. (2003). Can Vertical Specialization Explain the Growth of World Trade? Journal of Political Economy, 111(2003), 52–102.
Yi, K.-M. (2010). Can Multistage Production Explain the Home Bias in Trade? The American Economic Review, 100(1), 364–393.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gumata, N., Ndou, E. (2020). What Is the Impact of Imports by Stage of Production and the Manufacturing Sector Investment Growth?. In: The Secular Decline of the South African Manufacturing Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55148-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55148-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55147-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55148-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)