Abstract
Does an increase in trade-openness and import-penetration affect income inequality? We find that the manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth decline in response to positive trade-openness and import penetration shocks. This results in an increase in the Gini coefficient (income inequality). These results concur with vast literature and empirical findings showing that trade globalisation has a positive impact on income inequality. Furthermore, different sizes of positive shocks to trade-openness and import penetration depress the manufacturing sector output growth and employment and result in an increase in the Gini coefficient (income inequality). The results also show that the manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth decline more when the import penetration ratio is active in the model than when it is closed (the counterfactual response). Similarly, the Gini coefficient increases more when the import penetration ratio is active in the model than when it is closed. Thus, we conclude that the import penetration ratio amplifies the effects of trade-openness on the Gini coefficient and the manufacturing sector activity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aiyar, S., & Ebeke, C. (2019). Inequality of Opportunity, Inequality of Income and Economic Growth. IMF Working Paper WP/19/34. Retrieved from https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2019/02/15/Inequality-of-Opportunity-Inequality-of-Income-and-Economic-Growth-46566
Autor, A. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review 2013, 103(6), 2121–2168. Retrieved from http://seii.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Autor-Dorn-Hanson-The-China-Syndrome-Local-Labor-Market-Effects-of-Import-Competition-in-the-United-States-American-Economic-Revi.pdf.
Barusman, A. F., & Barusman, M. Y. S. (2017). The Impact of International Trade on Income Inequality in the United States since 1970’s. European Research Studies Journal, XX(4A), 35–50. Retrieved from https://www.ersj.eu/dmdocuments/2017-xx-4-a-3.pdf.
Cassette, A., Fleury, N., & Petit, S. (2012). Income Inequalities and International Trade in Goods and Services: Short-and Long-run Evidence. The International Trade Journal, 26(3), 223–254.
Chintrakarn, P., Herzer, D., & Nunnenkamp, P. (2010). FDI and Income Inequality: Evidence from a Panel of US States. Kiel Working Papers 1579, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW).
Demir, F., Ju, J., & Zhou, Y. (2012). Income Inequality and Structures of International Trade. Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting & Economics, 19(2), 167–180.
Dong, F. (2014). The Impact of Economic Openness on Standard of Living and Income Inequality in Eight Countries. Emerging Markets Review, 21, 234–264.
Ebenstein, A., Harrison, A., & McMillan, M. (2015). Why are American Workers getting Poorer? China, Trade and Offshoring. NBER Working Paper No. 21027.
Heimberger, P. (2019). Does Economic Globalisation Affect Income Inequality? A Meta-analysis. The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Working Paper 165. Retrieved from https://wiiw.ac.at/does-economic-globalisation-affect-income-inequality-a-meta-analysis-dlp-5044.pdf
Jaumotte, F., Lall, S., & Papageorgiou, C. (2013). Rising Income Inequality: Technology, or Trade and Financial Globalisation? IMF Economic Review, 61(2), 271–309.
Kilian, L., & Vigfusson, R. J. (2011, November). Nonlinearities in the Oil Price-Output Relationship. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 15(S3), 337–363. Cambridge University Press.
Krugman, P. (1995). Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1:1995. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/1995a_bpea_krugman_cooper_srinivasan.pdf
Krugman, P. (2019). What Economists (Including Me) Got Wrong About Globalization. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-10-10/inequality-globalization-and-the-missteps-of-1990s-economics
McNabb, R., & Said, R. (2013). Trade Openness and Wage Inequality: Evidence for Malaysia. The Journal of Development Studies, 49(8), 1118–1132.
Subramanian, A., & Kessler, M. (2013). The Hyper-globalization of Trade and Its Future. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper Series WP 13-6. Retrieved from https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/wp/wp13-6.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gumata, N., Ndou, E. (2020). Does an Increase in Trade-Openness and Import-Penetration Affect Income Inequality? Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector Output Growth and Employment Growth. In: The Secular Decline of the South African Manufacturing Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55148-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55148-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55147-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55148-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)