Abstract
Does the persistent widening in the trade deficit explain the decline in the manufacturing sector output and employment growth? We find that the trade balance deficits and surpluses exert opposing effects on the manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth. Furthermore, the trade deficit (surplus) channel amplifies the decline (increase) in the manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth in response to positive trade balance shocks. The R/US$ exchange rate appreciation shocks amplify the impact of positive trade deficit shocks on the manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth. The results from the historical decomposition approach indicate that in the absence of the trade deficit shock, the manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth would have been higher. As such, the trade deficit shock resulted in much lower manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth. Thus, the trade deficit shock dampened the manufacturing sector output and employment growth between 2005Q1 and 2008Q3. Widening and persistent trade deficits dampen the rate at which the manufacturing sector output growth and employment growth benefit from the heightened aggregate domestic demand shocks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See also manufacturing trade deficits are associated with smaller manufacturing employment. How much exactly has trade contributed since 2000 to manufacturing’s decline? Bivens J. 2015. Yes, Trade Deficits Do Indeed Matter for Jobs. https://www.epi.org/blog/yes-trade-deficits-do-indeed-matter-for-jobs/.
- 2.
See also Scott E. R. 2015. Manufacturing Job Loss Trade, Not Productivity, Is the Culprit. https://www.epi.org/publication/manufacturing-job-loss-trade-not-productivity-is-the-culprit/.
References
Autor, A. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2013). The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States. American Economic Review 2013, 103(6), 2121–2168. Retrieved from http://seii.mit.edu/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Autor-Dorn-Hanson-The-China-Syndrome-Local-Labor-Market-Effects-of-Import-Competition-in-the-United-States-American-Economic-Revi.pdf.
Krugman, P. (1995). Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1:1995. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2016/07/1995a_bpea_krugman_cooper_srinivasan.pdf.
Krugman, P. (2019). What Economists (Including Me) Got Wrong About Globalization. Retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-10-10/inequality-globalization-and-the-missteps-of-1990s-economics.
Subramanian, A., & Kessler, M. (2013). The Hyper-globalization of Trade and Its Future. Peterson Institute for International Economics Working Paper Series WP 13-6. Retrieved from https://www.piie.com/sites/default/files/publications/wp/wp13-6.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gumata, N., Ndou, E. (2020). Does the Persistent Widening in the Trade Deficit Explain the Decline in the Manufacturing Sector Output and Employment Growth?. In: The Secular Decline of the South African Manufacturing Sector. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55148-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55148-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55147-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55148-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)