Skip to main content

DNA Tests, mamzerut, and the Bureaucracies of Transnational Surrogacy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Judaism in Motion

Part of the book series: Contemporary Anthropology of Religion ((CAR))

  • 155 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses gay couples’ experiences with transnational surrogacy arrangements as well as the laws and bureaucratic protocols that are necessary to make children that belong to the commissioning fathers rather than to the surrogate mothers. It demonstrates that the procedures that are necessary to establish a legal relationship between father and child are shaped by rabbinic kinship principles even though the Orthodox rabbinate neither approves of these family formations nor recognizes the children as Jews. Thus, the bureaucratic procedures surrounding fatherhood tests entrench the rabbinate’s power to define what a Jew and a Jewish family are and, at the same time, facilitate the formation of families that transgress these definitions. Their encounters with bureaucracy remind gay couples of the ongoing discrimination they face but also shed light on their power to mobilize financial, social, and cultural capital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This number was announced by Doron Mamet at Conference of Tammuz International. New Paths. 10 February 2013. Personal Fieldnotes.

  2. 2.

    In 2016, the Tel Aviv Family Court ruled that the child of a gay couple can be registered even without a DNA test. The court maintained that the couple had proven the genetic relationship between the father who provided the sperm and the child by other evidence, such as legal and medical documents of the surrogacy process that took place in the United States. See: plonit v. The General Attorney (Hebrew), FC Tel Aviv 32901-05-14, 7 August 2016. https://www.nevo.co.il/psika_html/mishpaha/SM-14-05-32901-33.htm. Accessed 5 June 2020.

  3. 3.

    The agent-caretakers are often former surrogate mothers or egg donors themselves and thus share the same socioeconomic background (Deomampo 2013a, 168).

  4. 4.

    D.G., N.R., B.Y. v. The Office of the District Attorney Jerusalem (Hebrew), FC Jerusalem 28240/09, 19 March 2010. Found on: https://www.psakdin.co.il/Court.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibylle Lustenberger .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lustenberger, S. (2020). DNA Tests, mamzerut, and the Bureaucracies of Transnational Surrogacy. In: Judaism in Motion. Contemporary Anthropology of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55104-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55104-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55103-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55104-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics