Skip to main content

Government Growth

  • 97 Accesses

Part of the Studies in Public Choice book series (SIPC,volume 40)

Abstract

Explanations for the growth of the government that imply that it always grows are obviously destroyed by the early period histories. Something must have happened to change the way in which we respond to our governments or our governments respond to us. I have offered Bismarckism as a possible explanation, but I should emphasize that is all it is—a possible explanation.

The author “Gordon Tullock” is deceased at the time of publication.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-55081-3_2
  • Chapter length: 10 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-030-55081-3
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 2.1
Fig. 2.2
Fig. 2.3
Fig. 2.4
Fig. 2.5

Notes

  1. 1.

    This article originally appeared as Tullock (1995). It is reprinted here to make it more widely available. We thank the Department of Economics at National Chengchi University and the estate of Gordon Tullock for permission to reprint this paper. Minor edits to correct typographical errors have been made, as well introducing and labeling of sections.

  2. 2.

    I should say here, just as an expression of personal opinion, that I do not believe the various measures undertaken by either Mr. Hoover or Mr. Roosevelt were well designed to deal with the depression. Indeed, the fact that the United States had the deepest depression except for Germany and had the slowest recovery from that depression (with another depression in 1937 before recovery was completed) seems to me a result or these injudicious measures. The matter is, however, not very relevant here.

  3. 3.

    As another change, this was the first time that we did not repay our war debt in the period after the war. In the 1920s we had not completely repaid the debt when the depression broke but sizable payments on it were made.

  4. 4.

    “If the data is tortured long enough, it will confess,” in the famous worlds of Ronald Coase.

  5. 5.

    Note the size of the Boer War’s increase in expenditures. The fact that some 30,000 farmers could impose this kind of cost on the immense British empire shows what good fighters they were.

References

  • Buchanan J, Rowley C, Tollison R (eds) (1987) Deficits. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G (1995) Government growth. Taiwan J Polit Econ 1(1):21–36

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gordon Tullock .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tullock, G. (2021). Government Growth. In: Hall, J., Khoo, B. (eds) Essays on Government Growth. Studies in Public Choice, vol 40. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55081-3_2

Download citation