Skip to main content

Conclusions: Legitimacy Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communicative Legitimacy
  • 144 Accesses

Abstract

The concluding chapter explores how the tension between the individual and the system, between the client’s expectations and the profession’s assignment causes legitimacy deficits in the concrete welfare work. Since the process is supported by the administrative split between help and control, solidarity and justice, individual freedom and collective will, this basic approach must be changed. It offers the communicative action perspective, which shows that these fragmented phenomena instead are deeply interconnected, are two sides of the same phenomenon. As such, they become real resources for dealing with legitimacy deficits. The contradiction between the individual’s increased dependency and increased demands for self-realization and self-determination can be exceeded and ensure a shared responsibility, basic equality and effective cooperation between the parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brunkhorst, H. (2005). Solidarity. From Civic Friendship to a Global Legal Community. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, J. G. (2005). Habermas. A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forst, R. (2014). Justification and Critique. Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1990a). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J. (1990b). Justice and Solidarity: On the Discussion Concerning Stage 6. In E. T. Wren (Ed.), The Moral Domain. Essays in the Ongoing Discussions Between Philosophy and the Social Sciences (pp. 224–254). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). Postmetaphysical Thinking: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and Application. Remarks on Discourse Ethics. London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1997). Between Fact and Norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2000). The Inclusion of the Other. Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2012). Nachmetaphysische Denken II. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2013). Plea for a Constitutionalization of International Law. Athens: World Congress of Philosopy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995). The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvinen, M., & Mik-Meyer, N. (Eds.). (2003). At skabe en klient. Köpenhamn: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, T. (2004). Unlocking the Iron Cage: Public Administration in the Deliberative Democratic Theory of Jürgen Habermas. Administration & Society, 36, 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlström, A. (1990). Den enskilde individen och vårdapparaten: en analys av “mötet” utifrån teorin om det kommunikativa handlandet (The Individual and the Care System: An Analysis of the “Meeting” Based on the Theory of Communicative Action). Dissertation, Department of Social Work, University of Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlström, A., & Israel, J. (2002). Communicative and Strategic Action: An Examination of Fundamental Issues in the Theory of Communicative Action. International Journal of Social Welfare, 11(3), 210–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kihlström, A., & Wikström, E. (2008). Toward Network and Citizen: Collaborative Care for Drug Abusers. International Journal of Health Planning and Managment. Published online: www.interscience.wihley.com.

  • Michelman, F. (1986). Justification (and Justifiability) of Law in a Contradictory World. In J. R. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Justification, Nomos (New York), pp. 71–99, here p. 91. In Habermas, J. (1997). Between Fact and Norms (p. 88). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørager, J. (1987). System og livsverden. Århus: Förlaget ANIS.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Kihlström .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kihlström, A. (2020). Conclusions: Legitimacy Challenges. In: Communicative Legitimacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54949-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54949-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54948-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54949-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics