Abstract
The main purpose of this chapter is to provide a more specific and concrete illustration on ‘what gets measured’ as part of the evolving trend of fostering social emotional skills in education. We have therefore opted for somewhat detailed descriptions of a limited set of instruments that are in the relevant literature, particularly as they are sometimes used as ‘effect measures’ in evaluations of social-emotional learning programs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
EEF (Education Endowment Foundation) (2018). SPECTRUM database. Education Endowment Foundation: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/evaluating-projects/measuring-essential-skills/spectrum-database/.
- 2.
- 3.
Responsiveness refers to the measure being responsive to change. Dependent on the intended purpose and domain, measures can be used to identify ‘meaningful change’ (e.g. above a threshold for intervention).
- 4.
The qualification “mixed and trait” means that the instrument is mixed with respect to “ability” and “trait” interpretations of emotional intelligence, but tends to a “trait” interpretation. The items rather resemble items for personality trait questionnaires in the areas of agreeableness and extraversion.
- 5.
Typical performance measures are characterized by opinion-or belief-based items (typically on a Likert scale). Maximal measures are characterized by having ‘objectively’ correct and incorrect answers (Wigelsworth et al., 2017, p. 10).
References
Abrahams, L., Pancorbo, G., Primi, R., Santos, D., Kyllonen, P., John, O. P., et al. (2019). Social-emotional skill assessment in children and adolescents: Advances and challenges in personality, clinical, and educational contexts. Psychological Assessment, 31(4), 460–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000591.
Bagley, C., Bolitho, F., & Bertrand, L. (1997). Norms and construct validity of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in Canadian high school populations: Implications for counselling. Canadian Journal of Counseling, 31(1), 82–92.
Bajgar, J., Ciarrochi, J., Lane, R., & Deane, F. P. (2005). Development of the levels of emotional awareness scale for children (LEAS-C). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 569–586. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X35417.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory for behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (2001). Self-efficacy beliefs as shapers of children’s aspirations and career trajectories. Child Development, 72(1), 187–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00273.
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Gerbino, M., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). Role of affective self-regulatory efficacy in diverse spheres of psychosocial functioning. Child Development, 74(3), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00567.
Bandura, A., Pastorelli, C., Barbaranelli, C., & Caprara, G. V. (1999). Self-efficacy pathways to childhood depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.258.
Barnett, W. S., Jung, K., Yarosz, D. J., Thomas, J., Hornbeck, A., Stechuk, R., & Burns, S. (2008). Educational effects of the tools of the mind curriculum: A randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 299–313.
Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985642.
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The basic empathy scale in adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032297.
Ciucci, E., Baroncelli, A., Grazzani, I., Ornaghi, V., & Caprin, C. (2016). Emotional arousal and regulation: Further evidence of the validity of the “How I Feel” questionnaire for use with school-age children. The Journal of School Health, 86(3), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12370.
Credé, M. (2018). What shall we do about grit? A critical review of what we know and what we don’t know. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 606–611. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X18801322.
D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The basic empathy scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(2), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.020.
Danielson, C. K., & Phelps, C. R. (2003). The assessment of children’s social skills through self-report: A potential screening instrument for classroom use. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35(4), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2003.12069068.
de Wied, M., Maas, C., Goozen, S., van Vermande, M., Engels, R., Meeus, W., et al. (2007). Bryant’s empathy index: A closer examination of its internal structure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.99
Diperna, J. C., & Volpe, R. J. (2005). Self-report on the social skills rating system: Analysis of reliability and validity for an elementary sample. Psychology in the Schools, 42(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20095.
Drost, M., & Verra, P. (2019). Handboek RTTI met theoretische beschouwing [Handbook RTTI, with a theoretical reflection]. Bodegraven, The Netherlands: Docentplus.
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(6), 1087–1101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087.
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (Grit–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634290.
Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Evaluation/SPECTRUM/V6_Guidance_document.pdf.
EEF (Education Endowment Foundation). (2018). SPECTRUM database. Education endowment foundation. Retrieved from https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/projects-and-evaluation/evaluating-projects/measuring-essential-skills/spectrum-database/.
Erford, B. T., Duncan, K., & Savin-Murphy, J. (2010). Brief psychometric analysis of the self-efficacy teacher report scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and development, 43(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373454.
Flay, B. R., Adcock, A., Vuchinich, S., & Beets, M. (2006). Progress report of the randomized trial of Positive Action in Hawaii: End of third year of intervention. Retrieved from Research Gate website: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224942204.
Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38(5), 581–586.
Goossens, F. X., Gooren, E. M. J. C., de Castro, B. O., van Overveld, K. W., Buijs, G. J., Monshouwer, K., et al. (2012). Implementation of PATHS through Dutch Municipal Health Services: A quasi-experiment. International Journal of Conflict & Violence, 6(2), 235–248.
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). The social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Gresham, F. M., Elliott, N., Vance, J., & Cook, R. (2011). Comparability of the social skills rating system to the social skills improvement system: Content and psychometric comparisons across elementary and secondary age. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022662.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. http://dx.doi.org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271.
Gullone, E., & Taffe, J. (2012). The emotion regulation questionnaire for children and adolescents (ERQ-CA): A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 409–417. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025777.
Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cowen, E. C., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinwell, A. P., Guare, J. C., & Rohrbeck, C. A. (1986). The teacher child rating scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children’s school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review, 15(3), 393–409.
Holen, S., Waaktaar, T., Lervåg, A., & Ystgaard, M. (2012). The effectiveness of a universal school-based programme on coping and mental health: A randomised, controlled study of Zippy’s Friends. Educational Psychology, 32, 657–677.
John, O., & De Fruyt, F. (2015). Framework for the longitudinal study of social and emotional skills in cities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010.
Kane, M. T. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.527.
Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.
Kyllonen, P., Lipnevich, A. A., Burrus, J., & Roberts, R. D. (2014). Personality, motivation, and college readiness: A prospectus for assessment and development. Research report. Educational Testing Service RR-14-06. ETS Research Report Series.
Liebenberg, L., Ungar, M., & LeBlanc, J. C. (2013). The CYRM-12: A brief measure of resilience. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 104(2), 131–135.
Lopes, P. N., Nezlek, J. B., Extremera, N., Hertel, J., Fernández, B. P., Schütz, A., & Salovey, P. (2011). Emotion regulation and the quality of social interaction: Does the ability to evaluate emotional situations and identify effective responses matter? Journal of Personality, 79(2), 429–467. https://doi-org.proxy-ub.rug.nl/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00689.x.
Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., Côté, S., Beers, M., & Petty, R. E. (2005). Emotion regulation abilities and the quality of social interaction. Emotion, 5(1), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.5.1.113.
Mehrens, W. A. (1997). The consequences of consequential validity. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16(2), 16–18.
Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x.
Muldoon, O. T., Lowry, R. G., Prentice, G., & Trew, K. (2005). The factor structure of the multidimensional measure of children’s perceptions of control. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(3), 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2004.05.020.
Penza-Clyve, S., & Zeman, J. (2002). Initial validation of the emotion expression scale for children (EESC). Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31(4), 540–547. https://doi.org/10.1207/153744202320802205.
Popham, J. W. (1997). Consequential validity: Right concern-wrong concept. Educational Measurement: Issues and practice, 16(2), 9–13.
Saarni, C. (1999). The development of emotional competence. New York: Guilford Press.
Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C., & Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the trait meta-mood scale. In J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.), Emotion, disclosure, & health (pp. 125–154). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10182-006.
Sanders, P., & Brouwers, A. (2019). RCEC rating system for the quality of educational achievement tests and examinations. Arnhem, The Netherlands: RCEC.
Spirito, A., Stark, L. J., & Williams, C. (1988). Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 13(4), 555–574.
The National Mentoring Resource Center, Adaptive Coping with Stress. undated blog. https://nationalmentoringresourcecenter.org/index.php/toolkit/item/245-adaptive-coping-with-stress.html.
Wigelsworth, M., Humphrey, N., Black, L., et al. (2017). Social, psychological, emotional, concepts of self, and resilience outcomes. Understanding and Measurement (SPECTRUM).
Wolming, S., & Wikstrӧm, C. (2010). The concept of validity in theory and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695941003693856.
Wools, S. (2015). All about validity: An evaluation system for the quality of educational assessment. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Annex
Annex
In this Annex we cite items lists, or parts of the items of the instruments, discussed in this chapter. These citations fully depend on published articles, in the public domain, and not on Commercial sources. In each case the reference to the publication is included.
The Basic Empathy Scale
Items of the Basic Empathy Scale (20 items)
-
1.
My friends’ emotions don’t affect me much.
-
2.
After being with a friend who is sad about something, I usually feel sad.
-
3.
I can understand my friend’s happiness when she/he does well at something.
-
4.
I get frightened when I watch characters in a good scary movie.
-
5.
I get caught up in other people’s feelings easily.
-
6.
I find it hard to know when my friends are frightened.
-
7.
I don’t become sad when I see other people crying.
-
8.
Other people’s feeling don’t bother me at all.
-
9.
When someone is feeling ‘down’ I can usually understand how they feel.
-
10.
I can usually work out when my friends are scared.
-
11.
I often become sad when watching sad things on TV or in films.
-
12.
I can often understand how people are feeling even before they tell me.
-
13.
Seeing a person who has been angered has no effect on my feelings.
-
14.
I can usually work out when people are cheerful.
-
15.
I tend to feel scared when I am with friends who are afraid.
-
16.
I can usually realize quickly when a friend is angry.
-
17.
I often get swept up in my friends’ feelings.
-
18.
My friend’s unhappiness doesn’t make me feel anything.
-
19.
I am not usually aware of my friends’ feelings.
-
20.
I have trouble figuring out when my friends are happy.
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032297
The Children’s Self-Report Social Skills Scale
-
1.
I look others in the face when they talk
-
2.
I say thank you when someone does something nice to me
-
3.
I kick or hit someone if they make me angry
-
4.
I am bossy
-
5.
I take turns with others
-
6.
I listen to others when they talk
-
7.
I share toys and games with others
-
8.
I say I’m sorry when I hurt somebody by accident
-
9.
When I see others playing a game I would like to play, I ask if I can join them
-
10.
I say I’m sorry when I hurt someone on purpose
-
11.
I help others when they need help
-
12.
I ask others to play
-
13.
Others like me and have fun with me
-
14.
I make friends easily
-
15.
Others do not like me
-
16.
Others ask me to play
-
17.
When I come over, others ask me to move or give them more space
-
18.
I don’t play fairly
-
19.
I walk up to others and start conversations
-
20.
I speak or interrupt if someone else is talking
-
21.
I am too loud when I talk
Danielson, C. K., & Phelps, C. R. (2003). The assessment of children’s social skills through self-report: A potential screening instrument for classroom use. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 35(4), 218–229
Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)
(1) Satisfied with self. (2) I’m not good at all. (3) Have good qualities. (4) I can do things as well as others. (5) I don’t have much to be proud of. (6) I feel useless at times. (7) I am a person of worth. (8) I don’t respect myself. (9) I’m a failure. (10) I have a positive self-attitude.
Bagley, CH., Bolitho, F., and Bertrand, L. (1997) Norms and construct validity of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in Canadian High School Populations: Implications for Counseling. Canadian Journal of Counseling, Vol. 31;1 82–92
The child and youth resilience measure
(1) I have people I look up to. (2) Getting an education is important to me. (3) My caregiver(s) watch me closely. (4) My caregiver(s) know a lot about me (5) I eat enough most days. (6) I try to finish what I start. (7) I solve problems without drugs or alcohol. (8) I feel supported by my friends. (9) I know where to go to get help. (10) I feel I belong at my school. (11) My caregiver(s) stand(s) by me during difficult times. (12) My friends stand by me during difficult times. (13) I am treated fairly in my community. (14) I am aware of my own strengths. (15) I think it is important to serve my community. (16) I feel safe when I am with my caregiver(s). (17) I have opportunities to develop job skills. (18) I enjoy my caregiver(s)’ cultural and family tradition.
Liebenberg, L., Ulgar, M., & LeBlanc, J.C. (2013) The CYRM-12: A brief measure of resilience. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 104, 131–135
Emotion-regulation rating questionnaire for children and adults (ERQ-CA)
Items loading on cognitive reappraisal:
When I want to feel happier, I think about something different.
When I want to feel less bad (e.g. sad and worried), I think about something different.
When I am worried about something, I make myself think in a way that helps me feel better.
When I want to feel happier about something, I change the way I am thinking about it.
I control my feelings about things by changing the way I think about them.
When I want to feel less bad (e.g. sad, angry or worried) about something, I change the way I think about it.
Items loading on emotion suppression:
I keep my feelings to myself.
When I am feeling happy, I am careful not to show it.
I control my feelings by not showing them.
When I am feeling bad (e.g. sad, angry, worried), I am careful not to show it.
Gullone, E., & Taffe, J. (2012) The emotion regulation questionnaire for children and adolescents (ERQ-CA): A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 24(2), 409–417
The Self-Efficacy Teacher Report Scale (SETRS)
-
1.
When the student begins something, he/she tries hard to finish it
-
2.
The student begins important activities right away
-
3.
The student believes that he/she can solve a problem no matter how hard it is
-
4.
The student is successful
-
5.
Running into problems only makes the student try harder
-
6.
The student gets down to work when he/she needs to
-
7.
The student tries things that look too hard
-
8.
The student views the chance of failing as a challenge
-
9.
The student achieves what he/she sets out to do
-
10.
The student starts on big projects right away
-
11.
The student is certain of his/her ability to be successful
-
12.
Failing at something just makes the student try harder
-
13.
The student can stick to and complete activities he/she does not like to do
-
14.
When problems come up, the student faces them
-
15.
The student has a lot of self-confidence
-
16.
The student achieves important goals
-
17.
The student believes that, “if at first you don’t succeed, try, try again”
-
18.
The student is a person who does today what could be put off until tomorrow.
(cited from Erford, Duncan, & Savin-Murphy, 2010)
Reference
Erford, B. T., Duncan, K., & Savin-Murphy, J. (2010). Brief psychometric analysis of the Self-Efficacy Teacher Report Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and development, 43(2), 79–90.
Multidimensional measure of children’s perception of control MMCPC
The general domain (only the items from the General Scale will be cited).
Unknown control
When good things happen to me often there doesn’t seem to be any reason why.
Often, I can’t understand why good things happen to me.
A lot of times I don’t know why something goes wrong for me.
When something goes wrong for me I usually cannot work out why it happened.
Powerful others control
To get what I want I have to please the people in charge.
If there is something that I want to get, I usually have to please the people in charge to get it
If an adult doesn’t want me to do something I want to do, I probably won’t be able to do it.
I don’t have much chance of doing what I want if adults don’t want me to do it.
Internal control
I can pretty much control what will happen in my life.
I can pretty much decide what will happen in my life.
When I am unsuccessful, it’s usually my own fault.
When I don’t do well at something, it’s usually my own.
Muldoon, O. T., Lowry, R. G., Prentice, G., & Trew, K. (2005). The factor structure of the multidimensional measure of children’s perceptions of control. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(3), 647–657
The short Grit Scale
Consistency of Interest
-
1.
I often set a goal but later choose to pursue a different one.
-
5.
I have been obsessed with a certain idea or project for a short time but later lost interest.
-
6.
I have difficulty maintaining my focus on projects that take more than a few months to complete.
-
2.
New ideas and projects sometimes distract me from previous ones.
-
4.
My interests change from year to year.
-
3.
I become interested in new pursuits every few months
Perseverance of Effort
-
9.
I finish whatever I begin.
-
10.
Setbacks don’t discourage me.
-
12.
I am diligent.
-
11.
I am a hard worker.
-
7.
I have achieved a goal that took years of work.
-
8.
I have overcome setbacks to conquer an important challenge
Duckworth, A. L., & Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the short grit scale (Grit–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(2), 166–174
How I feel questionnaire
There are 30 items, answering categories: “Children are asked to rate on a 5-point scale (1 = not at all true of me, 2 = a little true of me, 3 = somewhat true of me, 4 = pretty true of me, 5 = very true of me) the extent to which the statements described their emotion experience over the previous 3 months”
Item stems:
F1: Positive Emotion
-
14.
Excited strong.
-
29.
Excited powerful.
-
19.
Excited often.
-
4.
Excited all the time
-
26.
Happy strong
-
11.
Happy powerful.
-
1.
Happy often.
-
16.
Happy all the time.
F2: Negative Emotion
-
13.
Mad often.
-
17.
Sad powerful
-
2.
Sad strong.
-
7.
Sad often.
-
23.
Mad powerful.
-
28.
Mad all the time.
-
8.
Mad strong.
-
22.
Sad all the time.
-
25.
Scared often.
-
20.
Scared strong.
-
5.
Scared powerful.
-
10.
Scared all the time.
F3: Emotion Control (EC)
-
18.
Mad intensity.
-
27.
Sad frequency.
-
12.
Sad intensity.
-
15.
Scared frequency.
-
30.
Scared intensity.
-
24.
Excited intensity.
-
73.
Mad frequency.
-
69.
Excited frequency.
-
21.
Happy frequency.
-
46.
Happy intensity.
Ciucci, E., Baroncelli, A., Grazzani, I., Ornaghi, V., & Caprin, C. (2016). Emotional Arousal and Regulation: Further Evidence of the Validity of the “How I Feel” Questionnaire for Use with School‐Age Children. Journal of School Health, 86(3), 195–203
The expression and emotion scale for children (EESC)
Children respond to items using a 5-point Likert scale with scores of 1 (not at all true), 2 (a little true), 3 (somewhat true), 4(very true), and 5 (extremely true) to indicate how well each item describes their experience with these expressive difficulties.
Poor awareness factor
-
8.
When I feel upset, I do not know how to talk about it.
-
15.
I often do not know why I am angry.
-
11.
Sometimes I just don’t have words to describe how I feel.
-
9.
I often do not know how I am feeling.
-
10.
People tell me I should talk about my feelings more often.
-
3.
When something bad happens, I feel like exploding.
-
14.
I know I should show my feelings, but it is too hard.
-
5.
I have feelings that I can’t figure out.
Expressive reluctance factor
-
1.
I prefer to keep my feelings to myself.
-
4.
I don’t show how I really feel in order not to hurt others’ feelings.
-
2.
I do not like to talk about how I feel.
-
12.
When I’m sad, I try not to show it.
-
7.
When I get upset, I am afraid to show it.
-
6.
I usually do not talk to people until they talk to me first.
-
16.
It is hard for me to show how I feel about somebody.
-
13.
Other people don’t like it when you show how you really feel.
Penza-Clyve, S., & Zeman, J. (2002). Initial validation of the emotion expression scale for children (EESC). Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31(4), 540–547
The Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
Given the complexity of the SSRS we refrain from seeking to cite full item sets, and just cite exemplary items in the Chapter’s main text.
Key reference: Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). The Social Skills Rating System. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service
The Emotional Awareness Scale for Children (LEAS-C)
Given the complexity of the LEAS-C we refrain from seeking to cite full item sets, and just cite exemplary items in the Chapter’s main text.
Key reference: Bajgar, J., Ciarrochi, L., Lane, R., and Deane, F.P. (2005). Development of the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale for Children (LEAS-C). British Journal of Developmental Psychology 23:569–86. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005x35417
The Empathy Index for Children and Adolescents (IECA) (Bryant’s Empathy Index)
Statement Yes/No
-
1.
It makes me sad to see a girl who can’t find anyone to play with (+)
-
2.
People who kiss and hug in public are silly (−)
-
3.
Boys who cry because they are happy are silly (−)
-
4.
I really like to watch people open presents, even when I don’t get a present myself (+)
-
5.
Seeing a boy who is crying makes me feel like crying (+)
-
6.
I get upset when I see a girl being hurt (+)
-
7.
Even when I don’t know why someone is laughing, I laugh too (+)
-
8.
Sometimes I cry when I watch TV (+)
-
9.
Girls who cry because they are happy are silly (−)
-
10.
It’s hard for me to see why someone else gets upset (−)
-
11.
I get upset when I see an animal being hurt (+)
-
12.
It makes me sad to see a boy who can’t find anyone to play with (+)
-
13.
Some songs make me so sad I feel like crying (+)
-
14.
I get upset when I see a boy being hurt (+)1
-
15.
Grown-ups sometimes cry, even when they have nothing to be sad about (−)
-
16.
It’s silly to treat dogs and cats as though they have feelings like people (−)
-
17.
I get mad when I see a classmate pretending to need help from the teacher all the time (−)
-
18.
Kids who have no friends probably don’t want any (−)
-
19.
Seeing a girl who is crying makes me feel like crying (+)
-
20.
I think it is funny that some people cry during a sad movie or while reading a sad book (−)
-
21.
I am able to eat all my cookies even when I see some-one looking at me wanting one (−)
-
22.
I don’t feel upset when I see a classmate being punished by a teacher for not obeying school rules (−)
References:
Key reference: De Wied, M., Maas, C., Van Goozen, S., Vermande, M., Engels, R., Meeus, W., Matthys, W., and Goudena, P. (2007). Bryant’s Empathy Index: A Closer Examination of its Internal Structure. European Journal of Psychological Assessment 23:99–104.
Other reference: Goossens et al.: Implementation of PATHS Through Dutch Municipal Health Services. IJCV: Vol. 6 (2) 2012, pp. 234–248
Kidcope-Child Version
Coping strategies in the Kidscope-Child Version (source: National Mentoring Resource Center)
1. I just tried to forget it |
2. I did something like watch TV or played a game to forget it |
3. I stayed by myself |
4. I kept quiet about the problem |
5. I tried to see the good side of things |
6. I blamed myself for causing the problem |
7. I blamed someone else for causing the problem |
8. I tried to fix the problem by thinking of answers |
9. I tried to fix the problem by doing something or talking to someone |
10. I yelled, screamed, or got mad |
11. I tried to calm myself down |
12. I wished the problem had never happened |
13. I wished I could make things different |
14. I tried to feel better by spending time with others like family, grownups, or friends |
15. I didn’t do anything because the problem couldn’t be fixed |
Positive or adaptive strategies are measured by items 5, 8, 9, 11, and 14; negative or maladaptive strategies are measured by items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, 12, 13, and 15. Using this approach, the total number of strategies used within a given category (e.g., positive) can be computed, and efficacy can be computed as the average of the ratings of helpfulness (0 for Not at all, 1 for A little and 2 for A lot) for those strategies endorsed.
References: The National Mentoring Resource Center, Adaptive coping with stress. undated blog, https://nationalmentoringresourcecenter.org/index.php/toolkit/item/245-adaptive-coping-with-stress.html
Spirito, A., Stark, L.J., & Williams, C. (1988). Development of a brief coping checklist for use with pediatric populations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 13(4), 555–574
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Complete scale, cited from Goodman (1999), appendix, p. 586.
Childs Name Date of Birth. Signature To be completed by Teacher, parent, Other
Considerate of other people’s feelings
Restless, overactive, cannot stay still for long
Often complains of headaches, stomach-aches or sickness
Shares readily with other children (treats, toys, pencils etc.)
Often has temper tantrums or hot tempers
Rather solitary, tends to play alone
Generally obedient, usually does what adults request
Many worries, often seems worried
Helpful if someone is hurt, upset or feeling ill
Constantly fidgeting or squirming
Has at least one good friend
Often fights with other children or bullies them
Often unhappy, down-hearted or tearful
Generally liked by other children
Easily distracted, concentration wanders
Nervous or clingy in new situations, easily loses confidence
Kind to younger children
Often lies or cheats
Picked on or bullied by other children
Often volunteers to help others (parents, teachers, other children)
Thinks things out before acting
Steals from home, school or elsewhere
Gets on better with adults than with other children
Many fears, easily scared
Sees tasks through to the end, good attention span
Key reference: Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 38(5), 581–586.
The Teacher Child Rating Scale (T-CRS)
Items
Examples of items per factor:
Acting Out
Disruptive in class
Constantly seeks attention
Shy-Anxious
Withdrawn
Unhappy, depressed, sad
Learning
Underachieving
Poorly motivated to achieve
Frustration Tolerance
Well behaved in school
Well-liked by classmates
Assertive Social Skills
Defends own views under group pressure
Comfortable as a leader
Task orientation
Completes work
Well organized
Key reference: Hightower, A. D., Work, W. C., Cowen, E. C., Lotyczewski, B. S., Spinwell, A. P., Guare, J. C., and Rohrbeck, C. A. (1986). The Teacher Child Rating Scale: A brief objective measure of elementary children’s school problem behaviors and competencies. School Psychology Review, 15(3), 393 409.
Flay, B.R., Adcock, A., Vuchinich, S., & Beets, M. (2006). Progress report of the randomized trial of Positive Action in Hawaii: End of third year of intervention. Retrieved from Research Gate website: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224942204.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scheerens, J., van der Werf, G., de Boer, H. (2020). Measurement of Soft Skills in Education. In: Soft Skills in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54787-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54787-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54786-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54787-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)