Skip to main content

Sustainable Midwifery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Birth in Disruptive Times

Part of the book series: Global Maternal and Child Health ((GMCH))

  • 522 Accesses

Abstract

Sustainable midwifery is best realized in a model of care that promotes not only optimal health for women and families but also long-term well-being for care providers. Midwifery has been with us since the dawn of our existence, but in numerous industrialized nations and despite excellent outcomes, midwives have been marginalized by political oppression based primarily on desires for the power and revenues of childbirth. As articulated by Davis-Floyd (Davis-Floyd, Int J Gynecol Obstet 75(Suppl 1):S5–S23, 2001; Davis-Floyd, American midwifery: a brief anthropological overview. In: Davis-Floyd R, Colleagues (eds) Ways of knowing about birth: mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 165–188, 2018b), the three models of healthcare now practiced are the technocratic, humanistic, and holistic. Each of these has a role to play in the perinatal period, but in terms of sustainability, holistic care is far superior, as within it, the patient becomes a client and primary decision-maker in her healthcare experience, with the midwife an equal partner in their interaction. The hierarchy that characterizes technocratic care, with practitioner in charge and patient essentially powerless, dissolves in holism. Medical education for hospital practice is largely based on technocratic tenets of authority and control, humanistic education may add elements of communication and kindness, but holistic education is the game changer. Tenets of holism can be used in any setting, as the time-tested skills of midwifery care are increasingly articulated and refined to meet a rising demand for this type of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 111.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borges V, Rososchansky J, al AF (2011) Effect of maternal hydration on increase of amniotic fluid index. Braz J Med Biol Res 44(3):263–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney M et al (2019) Giving birth in the United States and the Netherlands: midwifery care as integrated option or contested privilege? In: Davis-Floyd R, Cheyney M (eds) Birth in eight cultures. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 165–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheyney M, Davis-Floyd R (in press) Birth and the big bad wolf: the biocultural evolution of human childbirth, parts 1 and 2. Int J Child

    Google Scholar 

  • Childbirth Connection (2006) What every pregnant woman should know about cesarean section, 2nd ed. Childbirth Connection, New York. http://childbirthconnection.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E (2010) Midwifery education: trauma or transformation? Midwifery Today 96:40–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E (2016) The enduring qualities in midwifery. Midwifery Today 117:41–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E (2017a) Midwifery education for autonomous practice: the time is now! Midwifery Today 123:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E (2017b) Prenatal care: what really matters! Midwifery Today 124:8–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E (2018) Plateaus in labor and our sexual nature. Midwifery Today 126:14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E (2019) Heart & hands: a midwife’s guide to pregnancy & birth, 5th edn. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis E, Pascali-Bonaro B (2010) Orgasmic birth: your guide to a safe, satisfying, and pleasurable birth experience. Rodale Press, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd R (2001) The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet 75(Suppl 1):S5–S23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd R (2018a) The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of birth and health care. In: Davis-Floyd R, Colleagues (eds) Ways of knowing about birth: mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd R (2018b) American midwifery: a brief anthropological overview. In: Davis-Floyd R, Colleagues (eds) Ways of knowing about birth: mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 165–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis-Floyd R, Faber M, DeVries R (2013) An update on the Netherlands. Midwifery Today 105:54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden RD, Seifert LS, Winegar A et al (1987) Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdates pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 69:296

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskin IM (2003) Ina May’s guide to childbirth. Bantam Dell, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Halvorsen L et al (2013) Giving birth with rape in one’s past: a qualitative study. Birth 40(3):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich K, Sprenger J (1972) Excerpts from the Malleus Malificarum, part 1, question XI. In: Kors AC, Peters E (eds) Witchcraft in Europe, 1100–1700: a documentary history. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R (2009) Teamwork: an obstetrician, a midwife, and a doula in Brazil. In: Davis-Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss B-A et al (eds) Birth models that work. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 271–304

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ et al (2018) Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep 28(13) https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_13-508.pdf

  • McGuire M (2012) September is national infant mortality awareness month. Michael McGuire’s Blog, August 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxorn H, Foote WR (1986) Human labor & birth, 5th edn. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevathan W (1987) Human birth: an evolutionary perspective. Aldine de Gruyter, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Kolk B (2014) The body keeps the score: brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2015) Trends in maternal mortality: estimates by the WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, and the United Nations Population Division. WHO Publications, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Davis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Davis, E. (2021). Sustainable Midwifery. In: Gutschow, K., Davis-Floyd, R., Daviss, BA. (eds) Sustainable Birth in Disruptive Times. Global Maternal and Child Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54775-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54775-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54774-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54775-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics