Abstract
Sustainable midwifery is best realized in a model of care that promotes not only optimal health for women and families but also long-term well-being for care providers. Midwifery has been with us since the dawn of our existence, but in numerous industrialized nations and despite excellent outcomes, midwives have been marginalized by political oppression based primarily on desires for the power and revenues of childbirth. As articulated by Davis-Floyd (Davis-Floyd, Int J Gynecol Obstet 75(Suppl 1):S5–S23, 2001; Davis-Floyd, American midwifery: a brief anthropological overview. In: Davis-Floyd R, Colleagues (eds) Ways of knowing about birth: mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 165–188, 2018b), the three models of healthcare now practiced are the technocratic, humanistic, and holistic. Each of these has a role to play in the perinatal period, but in terms of sustainability, holistic care is far superior, as within it, the patient becomes a client and primary decision-maker in her healthcare experience, with the midwife an equal partner in their interaction. The hierarchy that characterizes technocratic care, with practitioner in charge and patient essentially powerless, dissolves in holism. Medical education for hospital practice is largely based on technocratic tenets of authority and control, humanistic education may add elements of communication and kindness, but holistic education is the game changer. Tenets of holism can be used in any setting, as the time-tested skills of midwifery care are increasingly articulated and refined to meet a rising demand for this type of care.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Borges V, Rososchansky J, al AF (2011) Effect of maternal hydration on increase of amniotic fluid index. Braz J Med Biol Res 44(3):263–266
Cheney M et al (2019) Giving birth in the United States and the Netherlands: midwifery care as integrated option or contested privilege? In: Davis-Floyd R, Cheyney M (eds) Birth in eight cultures. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 165–202
Cheyney M, Davis-Floyd R (in press) Birth and the big bad wolf: the biocultural evolution of human childbirth, parts 1 and 2. Int J Child
Childbirth Connection (2006) What every pregnant woman should know about cesarean section, 2nd ed. Childbirth Connection, New York. http://childbirthconnection.org
Davis E (2010) Midwifery education: trauma or transformation? Midwifery Today 96:40–41
Davis E (2016) The enduring qualities in midwifery. Midwifery Today 117:41–42
Davis E (2017a) Midwifery education for autonomous practice: the time is now! Midwifery Today 123:8–10
Davis E (2017b) Prenatal care: what really matters! Midwifery Today 124:8–10
Davis E (2018) Plateaus in labor and our sexual nature. Midwifery Today 126:14–16
Davis E (2019) Heart & hands: a midwife’s guide to pregnancy & birth, 5th edn. Ten Speed Press, Berkeley
Davis E, Pascali-Bonaro B (2010) Orgasmic birth: your guide to a safe, satisfying, and pleasurable birth experience. Rodale Press, Pennsylvania
Davis-Floyd R (2001) The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of childbirth. Int J Gynecol Obstet 75(Suppl 1):S5–S23
Davis-Floyd R (2018a) The technocratic, humanistic, and holistic paradigms of birth and health care. In: Davis-Floyd R, Colleagues (eds) Ways of knowing about birth: mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 3–44
Davis-Floyd R (2018b) American midwifery: a brief anthropological overview. In: Davis-Floyd R, Colleagues (eds) Ways of knowing about birth: mothers, midwives, medicine, and birth activism. Waveland, Long Grove, pp 165–188
Davis-Floyd R, Faber M, DeVries R (2013) An update on the Netherlands. Midwifery Today 105:54–59
Eden RD, Seifert LS, Winegar A et al (1987) Perinatal characteristics of uncomplicated postdates pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol 69:296
Gaskin IM (2003) Ina May’s guide to childbirth. Bantam Dell, New York
Halvorsen L et al (2013) Giving birth with rape in one’s past: a qualitative study. Birth 40(3):182–191
Henrich K, Sprenger J (1972) Excerpts from the Malleus Malificarum, part 1, question XI. In: Kors AC, Peters E (eds) Witchcraft in Europe, 1100–1700: a documentary history. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
Jones R (2009) Teamwork: an obstetrician, a midwife, and a doula in Brazil. In: Davis-Floyd R, Barclay L, Daviss B-A et al (eds) Birth models that work. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 271–304
Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ et al (2018) Births: final data for 2018. Natl Vital Stat Rep 28(13) https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_13-508.pdf
McGuire M (2012) September is national infant mortality awareness month. Michael McGuire’s Blog, August 31
Oxorn H, Foote WR (1986) Human labor & birth, 5th edn. Appleton & Lange, Norwalk
Trevathan W (1987) Human birth: an evolutionary perspective. Aldine de Gruyter, New York
Van der Kolk B (2014) The body keeps the score: brain, mind, and body in the healing of trauma. Penguin Books, New York
WHO (2015) Trends in maternal mortality: estimates by the WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, and the United Nations Population Division. WHO Publications, Geneva
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davis, E. (2021). Sustainable Midwifery. In: Gutschow, K., Davis-Floyd, R., Daviss, BA. (eds) Sustainable Birth in Disruptive Times. Global Maternal and Child Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54775-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54775-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54774-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54775-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)