Abstract
A prominent argument in the politicisation literature links the degree of politicisation of international institutions to the extent of their delegated political authority. I criticise the authority-politicisation thesis as theoretically myopic and falling short of adequately explaining many empirically observable instances of politicisation. Instead, I argue that politicisation is driven by the (expected) consequences of particular governance arrangements and that the perceived significance and magnitude of such consequences need not correlate with formally delegated or recognised authority. I illustrate the argument with discussions of three types of institutions—the UN General Assembly, the G7/8/20 summits, and coalitions of the willing—each of which can be factually consequential and has triggered substantial politicisation without possessing, as an institution, much recognised political authority in its own right.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Archibugi, Daniele. 1993. “The Reform of the UN and Cosmopolitan Democracy: A Critical Review.” Journal of Peace Research 30 (3):301–315.
Avant, Deborah D., Martha Finnemore, and Susan K. Sell. 2010. “Who Governs the Globe?” In Who Governs the Globe?, edited by idem, 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, Christian. 2014. Rituelle Inszenierung der Staatengemeinschaft: Theorie und empirische Analyse am Beispiel von VN-Generaldebatte und M+5-Gipfel. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Binder, Martin. 2012. “Die Politisierung internationaler Sicherheitsinstitutionen? Der UN-Sicherheitsrat und NGOs.” In Die Politisierung der Weltpolitik, edited by Michael Zürn and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt, 134–157. Berlin: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Binder, Martin, and Monika Heupel. 2015. “The Legitimacy of the UN Security Council: Evidence from Recent General Assembly Debates.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (2):238–250.
Brazys, Samuel, and Diana Panke. 2015. “Why Do States Change Positions in the United Nations General Assembly?” International Political Science Review 38 (1):70–84.
Carraro, Valentina. 2017. “The United Nations Treaty Bodies and Universal Periodic Review: Advancing Human Rights by Preventing Politicisation ?” Human Rights Quarterly 39:943–979.
Carter, David B., and Randall W. Stone. 2015. “Democracy and Multilateralism: The Case of Vote Buying in the UN General Assembly.” International Organization 69:1–33.
CIVICUS. 2018. Joint Letter in Support of the UN General Assembly Resolution on the Situation of Human Rights in Iran. Accessed November 13. https://www.civicus.org/index.php/media-resources/media-releases/open-letters/3617-to-all-permanent-missions-to-the-united-nations-in-new-york.
Cooper, Andrew F. 2005. “Stretching the Model of ‘Coalitions of the Willing.’”, CIGI Working Paper No. 1. Waterloo (Ontario): The Centre for International Governance Innovation.
de Wilde, Pieter, Wiebke Marie Junk, and Tabea Palmtag. 2015. “Accountability and Opposition to Globalization in International Assemblies.” European Journal of International Relations 22 (4):823–846.
de Wilde, Pieter, and Michael Zürn. 2012. “Can the Politicisation of European Integration be Reversed?” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (S1):137–153.
Easton, David. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias, 2014. “Why Do Citizens Want the UN to Decide? Cosmopolitan Ideas, Particularism and Global Authority.” International Political Science Review 37 (1):99–114.
Freedman, Rosa. 2014. Failure to Protect: The UN and the Politicisation of Human Rights. London: Hurst & Company.
Gallie, Walter Bryce. 1955–1956. “Essentially Contested Concepts.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56 (New Series):167–198.
Gordon, Joy. 1997–98. “The Concept of Human Rights: The History and Meaning of Its Politicisation.” Brooklyn Journal of International Law 23:689–791.
Grande, Edgar, and Swen Hutter. 2016. “Beyond Authority Transfer: Explaining the Politicisation of Europe.” West European Politics 39 (1):23–43.
Group of Seven. 1999. G7 Statement. Cologne, Germany, Accessed June 18. http://www.g8.utoronto.ca/summit/1999koln/g7statement_june18.htm.
Group of Twenty. 2008. The Group of Twenty: A History. http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/docs/g20history.pdf, 24.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. “The Constitutionalization of International Law and the Legitimation Problems of a Constitution for World Society.” Constellations 15 (4):444–455.
Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, Tobias Lenz, Jeanine Bezuijen, Besir Ceka, and Svet Derderyan. 2017. Measuring International Authority: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance. Volume III. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hurd, Ian. 2007. After Anarchy: Legitimacy & Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kauppi, Niilo, Kari Palonen, and Claudia Wiesner. 2016. “The Politification and Politicisation of the EU.” Rediscriptions 19 (1):72–90.
Kirton, John. 2006. “Explaining Compliance with G8 Finance Commitments: Agency, Institutionalization and Structure.” Open Economies Review 17:459–475.
Krisch, Nico. 2017. “Liquid Authority in Global Governance.” International Theory 9 (2):237–260.
Lake, David A. 2010. “Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance.” International Studies Quarterly 54 (3):587–613.
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Landolt, Laura K., and Byungwon Woo. 2017. “NGOs Invite Attention: From the United Nations Commission on Human Rights to the Human Rights Council.” Journal of Human Rights 16 (4):407–427.
Larionova, Marina, and Andrey Shelepov. 2017. “Gx Delivery Legitimacy: Compliance by Members.” Studia Diplomatica 68 (3):123–144.
Lenz, Tobias, Jeanine Bezuijen, Liesbet Hooghe, and Gary Marks. 2014. “Patterns of International Authority: Task Specific vs. General Purpose.” In Internationale Organisationen: Autonomie, Politisierung, interorganisationale Beziehungen und Wandel (Sonderheft 49 der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift), edited by Eugénia da Conceição-Heldt, Martin Koch and Andrea Liese, 131–156. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Nonhoff, Martin, Jennifer Gronau, Frank Nullmeier, and Steffen Schneider, 2009. “Zur Politisierung internationaler Institutionen: Der Fall G8.” Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 16 (2):237–267.
Ostrom, Elinor. 1986. “An Agenda for the Study of Institutions.” Public Choice 48:3–25.
Palonen, Kari, Claudia Wiesner, Veith Selk, Niilo Kauppi, Hans-Jörg-Trenz, Claire Dupuy, Virginie Van Ingelgom, and Philip Liste. 2019. “Rethinking Politicisation.” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (2):248–281.
Reich, Arie. 2005. “The Threat of Politicisation of the WTO.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 26:779–814.
Rixen, Thomas, and Bernhard Zangl. 2013. “The Politicisation of International Economic Institutions in US Public Debates.” The Review of International Organizations 8 (3):363–387.
Scheuerman, William E. 2008. “All Power to the (State-less?) General Assembly!” Constellations 15 (4):485–492.
Schmidtke, Henning. 2013. The Entry of the Laity into the Altar of International Relations: Why International Institutions Become Publicly Contested. Paper prepared for the 7th ECPR Annual Conference, Bordeaux, September 4–7, 2013. Available at https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/8487e12f-7b6a-43dc-bace-c72ddf28f150.pdf.
Sending, Ole Jacob. 2017. “Recognition and Liquid Authority.” International Theory 9 (2):311–328.
Terman, Rochelle, and Erik Voeten. 2018. “The Relational Politics of Shame: Evidence from the Universal Periodic Review.” Review of International Organizations 13:1–23.
Toure, Madina. 2017. “A New Yorker’s Guide to Protests throughout UN General Assembly Week.” Observer, September 20. https://observer.com/2017/09/united-nations-general-assembly-protests/.
Walgrave, Stefaan, and Dieter Rucht (eds.). 2010. The World Says No to War: Demonstrations against the War on Iraq. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zürn, Michael. 2017. “From Constitutional Rule to Loosely Coupled Spheres of Liquid Authority; A Reflexive Approach.” International Theory 9 (2):261–285.
Zürn, Michael, Martin Binder, and Matthias Ecker-Ehrhardt. 2012. “International Authority and its Politicisation.” International Theory 4 (1):69–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
von Staden, A. (2021). Political Authority, Expected Consequences, and the Politicisation of International Institutions. In: Wiesner, C. (eds) Rethinking Politicisation in Politics, Sociology and International Relations. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54545-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54545-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54544-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54545-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)