Skip to main content

Routine Data and Minimum Datasets for Palliative Cancer Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: Their Role, Barriers and Facilitators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Palliative Care for Chronic Cancer Patients in the Community

Abstract

‘Routine data’ describes datasets designed and developed primarily to support direct care provision, or for administrative and managerial purposes, rather than specifically for research. Routine data across all health system levels provide opportunities to inform and understand current service provision and evaluate any subsequent changes to it. Increasing rates of cancer in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) mean it is crucial to understand how existing and future data can help guide provision of palliative cancer care. This chapter outlines the role of, and barriers and facilitators to, routine data collection in SSA in informing the delivery of palliative cancer care, using a case study from Uganda and discussing the utility of a key indicator minimum dataset. The chapter concludes with an overview of the likely future influence of digital health technologies and their potential for facilitating the capture, sharing and use of routine data to inform delivery of palliative cancer care across care settings in SSA countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Globocan: All cancers [Internet]. International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2018. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/39-All-cancers-fact-sheet.pdf.

  3. Jemal A, Vineis P, Bray F, Torre L, Forman D. The Cancer atlas. American Cancer Society: Atlanta; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sleeman K, Brito M, Etkind S, Nkhoma K, Guo P, Higginson I, et al. The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups and health conditions. Lancet Glob Health. 2019;7:e883–92.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization. WHO Definition of Palliative Care. https://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/2020.

  6. Knaul FM, Farmer PE, Krakauer EL, De Lima L, Bhadelia A, Jiang Kwete X, et al. Alleviating the access abyss in palliative care and pain relief-an imperative of universal health coverage: the Lancet Commission report. Lancet. 2018;391(10128):1391–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gomes B, Calanzani N, Curiale V, McCrone P, Higginson IJ. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smith S, Brick A, O'Hara S, Normand C. Evidence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of palliative care: a literature review. Palliat Med. 2014;28(2):130–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraser BA, Powell RA, Mwangi-Powell FN, Namisango E, Hannon B, Zimmermann C, et al. Palliative care development in Africa: lessons from Uganda and Kenya. J Global Oncol. 2017;4:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Downing J, Grant L, Leng M, Namukwaya E. Understanding models of palliative care delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: learning from programs in Kenya and Malawi. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2015;50(3):362–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Harding R, Albertyn R, Sherr L, Gwyther L. Pediatric palliative care in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review of the evidence for care models, interventions, and outcomes. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;47(3):642–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harding R, Selman L, Powell RA, Namisango E, Downing J, Merriman A, et al. Research into palliative care in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(4):e183–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Okunade K, Bashan Nkhoma K, Salako O, Akeju D, Ebenso B, Namisango E, et al. Understanding data and information needs for palliative cancer care to inform digital health intervention development in Nigeria, Uganda and Zimbabwe: protocol for a multicountry qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(10):e032166.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Davies JM, Gao W, Sleeman KE, Lindsey K, Murtagh FE, Teno JM, et al. Using routine data to improve palliative and end of life care. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2016;6(3):257.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagenaar BH, Hirschhorn LR, Henley C, Gremu A, Sindano N, Chilengi R, et al. Data-driven quality improvement in low-and middle-income country health systems: lessons from seven years of implementation experience across Mozambique, Rwanda, and Zambia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(Suppl 3):830.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Peltan ID, Beesley SJ, Brown SM. Can big data deliver on its promises?-leaps but not bounds. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(8):e185694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Storick V, O'Herlihy A, Abdelhafeez S, Ahmed R, May P. Improving palliative and end-of-life care with machine learning and routine data: a rapid review. HRB Open Res. 2019;2:13.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhattacharya IS, Morden JP, Griffin C, Snowdon C, Brannan R, Bliss JM, et al. The application and feasibility of using routine data sources for long-term Cancer clinical trial follow-up. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017;29(12):796–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bandopadhyay S, Murthy GVS, Prabhakaran D, Taylor P, Banerjee A. India and the United Kingdom—what big data health research can do for a country. Learn Health Syst. 2019;3(2):e10074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sheikh A, Cornford T, Barber N, Avery A, Takian A, Lichtner V, et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in ‘early adopter’ hospitals. BMJ. 2011;343:d6054.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah A. Using data for improvement. BMJ. 2019;364:189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Perla RJ, Provost LP, Murray SK. The run chart: a simple analytical tool for learning from variation in healthcare processes. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(1):46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dossa NI, Philibert A, Dumont A. Using routine health data and intermittent community surveys to assess the impact of maternal and neonatal health interventions in low-income countries: a systematic review. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;135(Suppl 1):S64–s71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Khumalo T, Maasdorp V. The island hospice model of palliative care. Ecancermedicalscience. 2016;10:654.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Prager GW, Braga S, Bystricky B, Qvortrup C, Criscitiello C, Esin E, et al. Global cancer control: responding to the growing burden, rising costs and inequalities in access. ESMO Open. 2018;3(2):e000285.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Evaluation MEASURE. Data in Low- and middle- income countries: a review of the literature. North Carolina: MEASURE Evaluation; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Akhlaq A, McKinstry B, Muhammad KB, Sheikh A. Barriers and facilitators to health information exchange in low- and middle-income country settings: a systematic review. Health Policy Plan. 2016;31(9):1310–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lynch T, Connor S, Clark D. Mapping levels of palliative care development: a global update. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2013;45(6):1094–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Economist Intelligence Unit. Quality of death index: ranking palliative care across the world. London: The Economist; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rhee JY, Luyirika E, Namisango E, Powell RA, Garralda E, José Pons J, de Lima L, Centeno C. APCA atlas of palliative Care in Africa: IAHPC Press; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rhee JY, Garralda E, Torrado C, Blanco S, Ayala I, Namisango E, et al. Palliative care in Africa: a scoping review from 2005-16. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(9):e522–e31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gysels M, Pell C, Straus L, Pool R. End of life care in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of the qualitative literature. BMC Palliat Care. 2011;10:6.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mutedzi B, Langhaug L, Hunt J, Nkhoma K, Harding R. Improving bereavement outcomes in Zimbabwe: protocol for a feasibility cluster trial of the 9-cell bereavement tool. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5(1):66.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Jagwe J, Merriman A. Uganda: delivering analgesia in rural Africa: opioid availability and nurse prescribing. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;33(5):547–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wandera SO, Kwagala B, Nankinga O, Ndugga P, Kabagenyi A, Adamou B, et al. Facilitators, best practices and barriers to integrating family planning data in Uganda’s health management information system. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):327.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Ministry of Health. The health management information system, vol. 1. Kampala: Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Moten A, Schafer D, Farmer P, Kim J, Ferrari M. Redefining global health priorities: improving cancer care in developing settings. J Glob Health. 2014;4(1):010304.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Syzdykova A, Malta A, Zolfo M, Diro E, Oliveira JL. Open-source electronic health record systems for low-resource settings: systematic review. JMIR Med Inform. 2017;5(4):e44.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Dehnavieh R, Haghdoost A, Khosravi A, Hoseinabadi F, Rahimi H, Poursheikhali A, et al. The district health information system (DHIS2): a literature review and meta-synthesis of its strengths and operational challenges based on the experiences of 11 countries. Health Inf Manag J. 2018;48(2):62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nabudere H, Obuku E, Lamorde M. Advancing palliative care in the Uganda health system: an evidence-based policy brief. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(6):621–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Low D, Merkel EC, Menon M, Loggers E, Ddungu H, Leng M, et al. End-of-life palliative care practices and referrals in Uganda. J Palliat Med. 2018;21(3):328–34.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ministry of Health. Uganda national eHealth strategy. Kampala: Republic of Uganda Ministry of Health; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  43. World Health Organization. Strengthening accountability chains for maternal, newborn and child health in Uganda–mTrac. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  44. GSMA. Uganda: Driving inclusive socio-economic progress through mobile-enabled digital transformation. London. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Thomas KS, Boyd E, Mariotto AB, Penn DC, Barrett MJ, Warren JL. New opportunities for Cancer health services research: linking the SEER-medicare data to the nursing home minimum data set. Med Care. 2018;56(12):e90–e6.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. MEASURE Evaluation. Health informatics in low and middle-income countries: short course for health information system professionals course syllabus. https://www.measureevaluation.org/resources/publications/ms-18-144/: MEASURE Evaluation; 2018.

  47. Bhatt S, Evans J, Gupta S. Barriers to scale of digital health systems for cancer care and control in last-mile settings. J Global Oncol. 2017;4:1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar M, Gotz D, Nutley T, Smith JB. Research gaps in routine health information system design barriers to data quality and use in low- and middle-income countries: a literature review. Int J Health Plann Manag. 2018;33(1):e1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Hotchkiss DR, Diana ML, Foreit KG. How can routine health information systems improve health systems functioning in low- and middle-income countries? Assessing the evidence base. Adv Health Care Manag. 2012;12:25–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Allsop .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Allsop, M.J., Kabukye, J., Powell, R.A., Namisango, E. (2021). Routine Data and Minimum Datasets for Palliative Cancer Care in Sub-Saharan Africa: Their Role, Barriers and Facilitators. In: Silbermann, M. (eds) Palliative Care for Chronic Cancer Patients in the Community. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54526-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54526-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54525-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54526-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics