Skip to main content

Cultural Influence on Deceptive Communication

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Detecting Trust and Deception in Group Interaction

Part of the book series: Terrorism, Security, and Computation ((TESECO))

Abstract

The literature on indicators of deception is extensive, yet few rigorous investigations have documented the deceptive communication behavior associated with culture. Notwithstanding, culture can play a profound role in affecting the emotional and cognitive factors that are theorized to differentiate behavioral patterns between deceivers and truth-tellers. To close the considerable gap in our knowledge about deception in cross-cultural contexts, in this chapter, we measured several culturally relevant concepts and tested the relationship among cultural factors, deception, and deception detection. The beginning of the chapter reviews a number of cultural factors and instantiates culture into two prongs: the group-level and the individual-level. Then, we conducted an experiment with the rapid credibility assessment method involving 220 participants across more than ten ethnicity groups to explore how culture affects deception and its detection. Physiological and behavioral indicators have been studied to suggest how culture relates to deceivers’ motivation, cognitive difficulty, and nervousness, as well as their kinesic, vocalic, and linguistic behaviors. The study also examined influences of culture in deceivers’ success and tested behavior measures that could help to predict deception. This investigation establishes the foundation for the SCAN project and paves the way for the future research of culture influence on deceptive communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller, D., & Burgoon, J. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6(3), 203–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Derrick, D. C., Elkins, A. C., Humphreys, S. L., Jensen, M. L., Diller, C. B. R., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2008a). Potential noncontact tools for rapid credibility assessment from physiological and behavioral cues. Presented at the IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology, October 13–16, 2008, Prague, Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoon, J. K., Levine, T., Nunamaker, J. F., Metaxas, D., & Park, H. S. (2008b, August). Rapid credibility assessment: A report to the counterintelligence field activity (Contract No. H9C 104-07-C-0011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionisio, D. P., Granholm, E., Hillix, W. A., & Perrine, W. F. (2001). Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. Psychophysiology, 38, 205–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, K. (2001). Eye blinks: New indices for the detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Global Deception Research Team. (2006). A world of lies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37(1), 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gudykunst, W. B., & Lee, C. M. (2003). Assessing the validity of self construal scales: A response to Levine et al. Human Communication Research, 29, 253–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, J. A., & O’Connell, D. M. (1996). How do you look when feeling anxious? Facial displays of anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krys, K., Vauclair, C. M., Capaldi, C. A., Lun, V. M. C., Bond, M. H., DomĂ­nguez-Espinosa, A., Torres, C., Lipp, O. V., Manickam, S. S., Zing, C., AntalĂ­ková, R., Pavlopoulos, V., Teyssier, J., Hur, T., Hansen, K., et al. (2016). Be careful where you smile: Culture shapes judgments of intelligence and honesty of smiling individuals. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 40, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurohara, A., Terai, K., Takeuchi, H., & Umezawa, A. (2001). Respiratory changes during detection of deception: Mechanisms underlying inhibitory breathing in response to critical questions. Japanese Journal of Physiological Psychology and Psychophysiology, 19(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, J. A., Pavlidis, I., & Cooper, M. (2001). The face of fear. The Lancet, 357(9270), 1757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meservy, T. O., Jensen, M. L., Kruse, J., Burgoon, J. K., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2005). Automatic extraction of deceptive behavioral cues from video. In Intelligence and security informatics, lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3495). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, A., & Evans, B. (2019). Language, society and power (5th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nahari, G., Vrij, A., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Exploiting liars’ verbal strategies by examining the verifiability of details. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 19, 227–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. S., & Guan, X. (2006). The effects of national culture and face concerns on intention to apologize: A comparison of the USA and China. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 35, 183–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggio, R. E. (1986). Assessment of basic social skills. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 649–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29, 240–275.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We are grateful to the Army Research Office for funding much of the work reported in this book under Grant W911NF-16-1-0342. Judee Burgoon and Jay Nunamaker are affiliated with Discern Science International, a for-profit entity that develops systems for credibility assessment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judee K. Burgoon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burgoon, J.K., Metaxas, D., Nunamaker, J.F., (Tina) Ge, S. (2021). Cultural Influence on Deceptive Communication. In: Subrahmanian, V.S., Burgoon, J.K., Dunbar, N.E. (eds) Detecting Trust and Deception in Group Interaction. Terrorism, Security, and Computation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54383-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54383-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54382-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54383-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics