Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Solvency II, the European Government of Insurance Industry and Private Health Insurance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Private Health Insurance and the European Union

Abstract

This chapter considers the political battles that led to the far-reaching reform of solvency rules governing insurance activities in the EU, between 1994 and 2016. Then we review their main implications for a particular segment of this industry, namely private health insurance. Focusing on the prudential regime laid down in EU law and regulation, we show that the adoption of Solvency II is likely to be a critical shift for the sector. Indeed, and while previous directives were essentially preoccupied with finding common rules to organize competition within the Single Market, Solvency II developed as a more conceptual architecture, with rules, requirements and standards intended to become ingrained in insurers’ daily activities. This shift was essentially legitimized as providing greater transparency and safety to financial investors and policyholders. Yet, we argue from the vantage point of private health insurance that this statement is open to doubt, and that greater financialization of entire segments of the industry could happen instead as a result of the implementation of Solvency II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benoît, C. (2019). The New Political Economy of Regulation. French Politics, 17(4), 482–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît, C., & Coron, G. (2019). Private Health Insurance in France: Between Europeanization and Collectivization. The Milbank Quarterly, 97(4), 1108–1150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benoît, C., & Thiemann, M. (in press). Regulation. In J. Pevehouse & L. Seabrooke (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of International Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhart, T., Reuß, A., & Zwiesler, H.-J. (2017). Allowance for Surplus Funds Under Solvency II: Adequate Reflection of Risk Sharing Between Policyholders and Shareholders in a Risk-based Solvency Framework? European Actuarial Journal, 7(1), 51–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, D. (2010). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton University Press: Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEIOPS. (2006a). QIS1—Summary Report. Brussels, CEIOPS-FS-01/06.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEIOPS. (2006b). QIS2—Summary Report. Brussels, CEIOPS-SEC-71/06S.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEIOPS. (2007). Report on QIS3 for Solvency II. Brussels, CEIOPS-DOC-19/07.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEIOPS. (2010). Task Force Report on the Liquidity Premium. Brussels, CEIOPS-SEC-34/10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, S., Hayward, T., Houtepen, J., & Serre, D. (2017). Analysis of Insurers’ First Set of Solvency and Financial Condition Reports. Milliman Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Meij, L. (2011). Solvency II: Friend or Foe? Pensions, 16, 137–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doff, R. (2008). A Critical Analysis of the Solvency II Proposals. The Geneva Papers, 33, 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doff, R. (2016). The Final Solvency II Framework: Will it Be Effective? The Geneva Papers, 41, 587–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIOPA. (2013). Guidelines System of Governance. Brussels, EIOPA-CP-13/08.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eling, M., Schmeiser, H., & Schmitt, J. (2007). The Solvency II Process: Overview and Critical Analysis. Risk: Management and Insurance Review, 10(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1997). Report to the Insurance Committee on the Need for Further Harmonisation of the Solvency Margin. Brussels, COM (97) 398 Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (1999). Révision de la position financière globale d’une entreprise d’assurance—Exercice Solvabilité II. Brussels, MARKT/2095/99.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2003). Design of a Future Prudential Supervisory System in the EU—Recommendations by the Commission Services. Working Paper, Brussels, MARKT/2509/03.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2004a). Solvency II: Organization of Work, Discussion on Pillar I Work Areas and Suggestions of Further Work on Pillar II for CEIOPS. Working Paper, Brussels, MARKT/2543/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2004b). The Draft Second Wave Calls for Advice from CEIOPS and Stakeholder Consultation on Solvency II. Working Paper, Brussels, MARKT/2515/04.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2015). Solvency II Overview: Frequently Asked Questions. EC Fact Sheet. Retrieved April 30, 2019, from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-3120_en.htm.

  • FFSA. (2006, July). Letter to CEIOPS Chair on QIS2. Paris: FFSA. Retrieved May 1, 2019, from https://eiopa.europa.eu/Publications/QIS/LettreHenrikBjerre-Nielsen21juillet06.pdf.

  • Foroughi, K. (2012). Market-consistent Valuations and Solvency II: Implications of the Recent Financial Crisis. British Actuarial Journal, 17(1), 66–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • François, P. (Ed.). (2020a). Solvabilité 2: Nature, genèse, consequences. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • François, P. (2020b). La longue marche de Solvabilité I. In P. François (Ed.), Solvabilité 2: Nature, genèse, consequences. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • François, P. (2020c). Tabula Rasa. In P. François (Ed.), Solvabilité 2: Nature, genèse, consequences. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • François, P. (2020d). Négocier dans le Maelström. In P. François (Ed.), Solvabilité 2: Nature, genèse, consequences. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • François, P., & Frézal, S. (2018). Instituer l’incohérence. Aléa et hétérogénéité au sein du secteur assurantiel. Sociologie du travail, 60(1), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frézal, S. (2018). Solvency II is Not Risk-based: Could It Be? Evidence from Non-Life Calibrations. North American Actuarial Journal, 22(3), 365–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gatzer, N., & Wesker, H. (2012). A Comparative Assessment of Basel II/III and Solvency II. The Geneva Papers, 37, 539–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordy, M., Heitfield, E., & Wu, J. (2014). Risk-Based Regulatory Capital and the Basel Accords. In A. Berger, P. Molyneux, & J. Wilson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Banking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gratz, J.-C. (2019). The Power of Standards. Transnational Hybrid Authority and the Globalization of Services. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2014). Neither Real Nor Fictitious But ‘As If Real’? A Political Ontology of the State. British Journal of Sociology, 65(3), 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IFA. (2016). Solvency 2—Health Insurance. London: Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, B., & Smith, A. (Eds.). (2014). The EU Government of Industries: Markets, Institutions and Politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kean, S. (2009). How has Solvency II been Affected by the Financial Crisis and How Will it Affect Risk Management Among Insurers? Journal of Risk Management and Financial Institutions., 3(1), 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, D., & Stears, M. (2011). How the U.S State Works: A Theory of Standardization. Perspective on Politics, 9(3), 505–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2002). Study into the Methodologies to Assess the Overall Financial Positions of an Insurance Undertaking from the book Perspective of Financial Supervision. Brussels, ETD/ BS-3001/C/45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laas, D., & Siegel, C. (2016). Basel III versus Solvency II: An Analysis of Regulatory Consistency under the New Capital Standards. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 84(4), 1231–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, R. (2012). From Failure to Failure: The Politics of International Banking Regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 19(4), 609–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, U., & Ronkainen, V. (2004). Solvency II: Towards a New Insurance Supervisory System in the EU. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 6, 462–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano, P., & Siri, M. (Eds.). (2017). Insurance Regulation in the European Union. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masse, E. (2016, November 25). Solvency II’s impact on French Healthcare Mutual. Paris: Paper Presented at the AIM Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch, C. (2009, April 19–22). Solvency II Update. Sydney. Paper presented at the Biennial Convention of the Institute of Actuaries of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, H. (1997). Solvency of Insurance Undertakings. Brussels: Report by the Conference of Insurance Supervisory Services of the Member States of the EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pool, B. (1990). The Creation of the Internal Market in Insurance. Brussels: European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quaglia, L. (2011). The Politics of Insurance Regulation and Supervision Reform in the European Union. Comparative European Politics, 9(1), 100–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, R., Barett, A., Brooks, M., et al. (2017). A Review of Solvency II: Has it Met Its Objectives? British Actuarial Journal, 23(4), 1–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph, O. (2016, January 3). How Solvency II Works. Financial Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, A. (2006). Solvency: Models, Assessments and Regulation. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V., & Radaelli, C. (2004). Policy Change and Discourse in Europe: Conceptual and Methodological Issues. West European Politics, 27(2), 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., Oechslin, J., & von Tautphoeous, M. (2009). Solvency II: The Next Revolution. Munich RE, Presentation at the Analysts’ Dinner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve Human Condition Have Failed. New Heaver: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P. (2002). Prudential Supervision of Insurance Undertakings. Final Report, Conference of Insurance Supervisory Services of the Member States of the EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (2016). The Politics of Economic Activity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, T. (2008). Solvency II and the Work of CEIOPS. The Geneva Papers, 33, 60–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanova, R., & Gründl, H. (2014). Solvency II: A Drivers for Mergers and Acquisitions? The Geneva Papers, 39, 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarup, A. (2012). A Well-Intentioned Folly: The Macroeconomic Implications of Solvency II. Economic Affairs, 32(3), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, S., & Mossialos, E. (2002). Voluntary Health Insurance in the European Union: A Critical Assessment. International Journal of Health Services, 32(1), 19–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorburn, C. (2004, February). On the Measurement of Solvency of Insurance Companies. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, no 3199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O., Bähr, H., & Falkner, G. (2007). Modes of Governance: Towards a Conceptual Clarification. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsingou, E. (2008). Transnational Private Governance and the Basel Process: Banking Regulation and Supervision, Private Interests and Basel II. In J.-C. Graz & A. Noelke (Eds.), Transnational Private Governance and its Limits (pp. 58–68). Routledge: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hulle, K. (2005). Solvabilité II: Une approche ‘risquée’? Revue d’économie financière, 80, 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenabeele, T. (2014, September–October). Solvency II in a Nutshell. Revue bancaire et financière/Banken Financiewezen, n°5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, V. (2014). Uncalculated Risks: The Transformation of Insurance, the Erosion of Regulation and the Economic and Social Consequences. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for European Studies and Comparative Politics, Sciences Po (Paris), CNRS, Paris, France

    Cyril Benoît

Authors
  1. Cyril Benoît
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyril Benoît .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for European Studies and Comparative Politics, Sciences Po (Paris), CNRS, Paris, France

    Cyril Benoît

  2. Intitut de l’Ouest : Droit et Europe Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France

    Marion Del Sol

  3. Centre for Comparative Labour Law and Social Security, Université de Bordeaux, CNRS, Pessac, France

    Philippe Martin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Benoît, C. (2021). Solvency II, the European Government of Insurance Industry and Private Health Insurance. In: Benoît, C., Del Sol, M., Martin, P. (eds) Private Health Insurance and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54355-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation