Skip to main content

Prosody II: Intonation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Investigating Spoken English

Abstract

This chapter reviews ways of describing intonational contours expanding on the characteristics of boundaries and accents introduced in Chapter 11. It uses a simplified version of the Tones and Break Indices (ToBI) framework for capturing the fundamental meaning contrasts and functions conveyed through the manipulation of melody in English. In the skills building domain, the chapter’s activities strengthen the proficiency in reading and manipulating Praat’s pitch tracking and increase awareness of the difference between fundamental frequency and pitch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckman, Mary, Julia Hirshberg, and Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2005. The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework. In Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, ed. Sun-Ah Jun, 9–54. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brazil, David. 1997. The communicative value of intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, Robert D. 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The phonology of tone and intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, Sun-Ah. 2005. Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, Sun-Ah. 2014. Prosodic typology II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert, Janet, and Julia Hirschberg. 1990. The meaning of intonation contours in the interpretation of discourse. In Intentions in communication, ed. Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha E. Pollack, 271–311. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczepek-Reed, Beatrice. 2010. Analysing conversation: An introduction to prosody. London: Red Globe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veilleux, Nanette, Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel, and Alejna Brugos. 2006. 6.911 Transcribing prosodic structure of spoken utterances with ToBI. January IAP 2006. Massachusetts Institute of Technology: MIT OpenCourseWare. https://ocw.mit.edu.

  • Ward, Nigel. 2019. Prosodic patterns in English conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Štefan Beňuš .

12.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Beňuš, Š. (2021). Prosody II: Intonation. In: Investigating Spoken English. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54349-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54349-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54348-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54349-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics