Abstract
Although the Constitution of South Africa provides the basis for the use of the UNIDROIT Principles in developing the law, this has not yet been argued or proposed in any reported case. The obligation to negotiate in good faith has not yet been clearly established in South African law, but the recent Makate case may provide the impetus for such a development. The Consumer Protection Act has introduced remedies for some problems such as surprising terms, but does not find application in commercial contracts. The interpretational approach to contracts has also significantly evolved from a textual to a contextual approach. The right to terminate a contract due to breach under South African law is comparable that under the UNIDROIT Principles. The right to claim interest after breach under South African law is similar to that under the UNIDROIT Principles. The Prescribed Rate of Interest Act makes provision for determining the interest rate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Eiselen, S. (2021). Questionnaire on the Use of the UPICC in Order to Interpret or Supplement National Contract Law: South Africa. In: Garro, A., Moreno RodrÃguez, J.A. (eds) Use of the UNIDROIT Principles to Interpret and Supplement Domestic Contract Law. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54322-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54322-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54321-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54322-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)