Skip to main content

Design Thinking to Engage Consumers in Achieving Zero Waste Food Experiences: The CEASE Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Design Thinking for Food Well-Being

Abstract

Food waste represents one of the main issues undermining the sustainability of our food systems, which is why its minimization has been comprised among the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the UN’s 2030 Agenda. Some researchers have begun to link the concepts of food waste and food security with well-being, suggesting that if individuals reduce their food waste, they can improve their well-being and that of the community and contribute to the achievement of different SDGs. Yet, few researches have so far looked at a concrete link between food waste initiatives, consumer engagement, and well-being, and few if any studies have analyzed design thinking and food waste, a gap which the present chapter seeks to fill.

The number of companies that have decided to face a radical change in their business model is growing. Today more than ever, due to the economic crisis that will follow the current pandemic due to COVID-19, as well as social and environmental concerns, it is urgent to rethink the traditional economic model and craft a more responsible and regenerative economy.

Companies must become increasingly capable of combining business with attention to creating shared value, involving end users, to collaborate in achieving sustainable development goals. Without giving up their profits, businesses must make a greater positive impact on individuals and society.

Based on the fact that digital solutions are a good way to minimize consumer food waste (Secondi et al. 2019), this chapter presents an analysis of the Too Good To Go app. The app is helping, encouraging, and motivating users to engage in food waste reduction, while persuading a smaller group to start taking concrete action to reduce waste. Nevertheless, to increase the impact on food waste reduction, additional action and a broader engagement on the part of businesses are strongly needed.

In this context, this chapter presents a new framework CEASE that deploys design thinking for the purpose of reducing food waste while aiming to build a community of conscious consumers that actively engage in food waste prevention actions.

This chapter argues that the use of the CEASE framework will inform an improved understanding of how empathy and creativity, two main determinants of the design thinking approach, can be used to promote healthier and sustainable food behaviors and at the same time reduce food waste and improve individuals’ well-being by designing groundbreaking food experiences.

Every year, 1.3 billion tons of food is wasted along the food supply chain (FSC), from cultivation and production to final consumption causing significant economic, environmental, and social harm. This chapter presents a new framework CEASE that deploys design thinking for the purpose of reducing food waste while aiming to build a community of conscious consumers that actively engage in food waste prevention actions. This chapter argues that the use of the CEASE framework will inform an improved understanding of how empathy and creativity, two main determinants of the design thinking approach, can be used to promote healthier and sustainable food behaviors and at the same time reduce food waste and improve individuals’ well-being by designing groundbreaking food experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    From an interview to Katrina Brown https://www.barillacfn.com/en/magazine/food-and-sustainability/empathy-between-man-and-environment/.

References

  • Addis M, Holbrook M (2001) On the conceptual link between mass customisation and experiential consumption: an explosion of subjectivity. J Consum Behav Int Res Rev 1(1):50–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Batat W (2016) New paths in researching “alternative” consumption and well-being in marketing: alternative food consumption. Mark Theory 16(4):561–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batat W (2019) Food and experiential marketing. Routledge: Interpretative Marketing Research Series, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bendell J, Doyle A (2017) Healing capitalism. Five years in the life of business, finance and corporate responsibility. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Block LG, Grier SA, Childers TL, Davis B, Ebert JEJ, Kumanyika S et al (2011) From nutrients to nurturance: a conceptual introduction to food well-being. J Public Policy Mark 30:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2008) Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev 86(6):84–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. HarperCollins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. and Wyatt J. (2010) Design Thinking for Social Innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Winter 2010, pp. 30–35 [online] Available at: https://ssir.org/issue/winter_2010

  • Cicatiello C, Secondi L, Principato L (2019) Investigating consumers’ perception of discounted suboptimal products at retail stores. Resources 8(3):129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi M (2000) The costs and benefits of consuming. J Consum Res 27(2):267–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mozota BB (2010) The four powers of design: a value model in design management. Design Management Review 17(2):44–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne D, Martin R (2006) Design thinking and how it will change management education: an interview and discussion. Acad Manag Learn Edu 5(4):512–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit- Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition (2018) Fixing food 2018. Retrieved from: http://foodsustainability.eiu.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/34/2016/09/FixingFood2018.pdf

  • EIU-BCFN (2018) Economist Intelligence Unit- Barilla Center for Food and Nutrition

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) BIO Intelligence Service, preparatory study on food waste across EU 27. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/bio_foodwaste_report.pdf

  • European Commission (2019a) EU agricultural outlook for markets and income, 2019–2030. European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2019b). From farm to fork. The European green deal. Available online at: https://ec.europa.eu/food/farm2fork_en. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

  • FAO (2013) Food wastage footprint: impacts on natural resources. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3347e/i3347e.pdf

  • FAO (2014) Food wastage footprint: full-cost accounting. Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3991e.pdf

  • FAO (2019) The state of food and agriculture. Moving forward on food loss and waste reduction

    Google Scholar 

  • FUSIONS (2016) Estimates of food wasted levels, ISBN 978-91-88319-01-2, retreived: https://www.eufusions.org/phocadownload/Publications/Estimates%20of%20European%20food%20waste%20levels.pdf

  • Geissdoerfer M, Bocken NMP, Hultink EJ (2016) Design thinking to enhance the sustainable business modelling process. J Clean Prod 135:1218–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson C, Mitchell P (2017) The business case for reducing food loss and waste. Washington, DC: Champions 12.3

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford - D-School (2007) Design thinking process. Stanford University Palo, Alto

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzini E (2015) Design, when everyone designs. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marti P, Rizzo A (2003) Levels of design: from usability to experience. Proceeding of HCI International, Crete, n.p

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RL (2011) The innovation catalysts. Harv Bus Rev 89:82–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Massari S (2012) Introducing food experience design in the food studies curriculum. GLIDE’12 Conference Proceedings, 7 November

    Google Scholar 

  • Massari S (2017) Food design and food studies: discussing creative and critical thinking in food system education and research. Int J Food Des 2(1):117–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Massari, S., Allievi, F., Recanati, F. (2020). “Fostering empathy towards effective sustainability teaching: from the Food Sustainability Index educational toolkit to a new pedagogical model.” in “”Teaching and Sustainable Development: using the transformative power of teaching to raise awareness on sustainable development and achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals”. Published by Edward Elgar Publishing Inc. In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mbow, C., C. Rosenzweig, L.G. Barioni, T.G. Benton, M. Herrero, M. Krishnapillai, E. Liwenga, P. Pradhan, M.G. Rivera-Ferre, T. Sapkota, F.N. Tubiello, Y. Xu, 2019: Food Security. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. In press. available online at https://www.ipcc.ch/srccl/

  • McDonough W, Braungart M (2002) Design for the triple top line: new tools for sustainable commerce. Corp Environ Strateg 9(3):251–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mont O, Heiskanen E (2015) Breaking the stalemate of sustainable consumption with industrial ecology and a circular economy. In: Reisch L, Thøgersen J (eds) Handbook of research on sustainable consumption. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutanen UM (2008) Developing organizational design capability in a Finland-based engineering corporation: the case of Metso. Des Stud 29(5):500–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Närvänen E, Mesiranta N, Mattila M, Heikkinen A (2020) Food waste management. Solving the wicked problem. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Ojo ME, Mbohwa C, Akinlabi ET (2015) Sustainability – competitive advantage? In: Proceedings of the 2015 international conference on operations excellence and service engineering, Orlando, Florida, USA, September 10–11, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen NV (2015) Design thinking and food innovation. Trends Food Sci Technol 2(41):182–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parfitt J, Barthel M, Macnaughton S (2010) Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans Royal Soc B Biol Sci 365(1554):3065–3081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perks H, Cooper R, Jones C (2005) Characterizing the role of design in new product development: an empirically derived taxonomy. J Prod Innov Manag 22(2):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Principato L (2018) Food waste at consumer level. A comprehensive literature review. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Principato L., Mattia G., Di Leo A., Pratesi C.A. (2020). The household wasteful behaviour framework: A systematic review of consumer food waste. Industrial Marketing Management. in press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schanes K, Dobernig K, Gözet B (2018) Food waste matters - a systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications. J Clean Prod 182:978–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secondi L, Principato L, Ruini L, Guidi M (2019) Reusing food waste in food manufacturing companies: the case of the tomato-sauce supply chain. Sustainability 11:2154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stickdorn M, Schneider J, Andrews K, Lawrence A (2011) This is service design thinking basics, tools, cases. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Swim JK, Clayton S, Howard GS (2011) Human behavioral contributions to climate change: psychological and contextual drivers. Am Psychol 66(4):251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (2005) Le origini culturali della cognizione umana. Società editrice Il Mulino, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  • UN General Assembly (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEA (2016) A contribution to the global follow-up and review in the 2016 High Level Political Forum (HLPF) on the work of the United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/10554UNEA%20inputs%20to%20the%20HLPF%202016%20(Final).pdf

  • USDA (2017) Agricultural statistics 2017. Available online at: https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Ag_Statistics/2017/Complete%20Ag%20Stats%202017.pdf

  • Van Geffen, L. E. J., van Herpen, E., & van Trijp, J. C. M. (2016). Causes & Determinants of Consumers Food Waste. REFRESH Deliverable 1.1. Also available at https://eu-refresh.org/causes-determinants-consumers-food-waste.

  • Van der Haar S, Zeinstra GG (2019) The impact of Too Good To Go on food waste reduction at the consumer household level. Wangeningen University Research, Wageningen. ISBN 978-94-6395-149-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken B (2010) Old and new routes to sustainable behaviour. In: Whitmarsh L, O’Neill S, Lorenzoni I (eds) Engaging the public with climate change. Earthscan, London, pp 17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken B, Wood W (2006) Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Mark 25:90–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer RW, Borja de Mozota B (2005) The impact of user-oriented design on new product development: an examination of fundamental relationships. J Prod Innov Manag 22(2):128–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser FS, Stappers PJ, Lugt RV (2005) Contextmapping: experiences from practice. CoDesign Int J CoCreation Des Arts 1(2):119–149

    Google Scholar 

  • White K, Habib R, Hardisty DJ (2019) How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework. J Market 83(3):22–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood W, Quinn JM, Kashy DA (2002) Habits in everyday life: thought, emotion, and action. J Pers Soc Psychol 83:1281–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young G (2010) Design thinking and sustainability. Available at: https://zum.io/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Design-thinking-and-sustainability.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2020

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Arianna Camillo (Business Development Manager, Too Good To Go, Italy) for her valuable contribution to the case-study description and impact on SDGs and design thinking heuristics.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sonia Massari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Massari, S., Antonelli, M., Principato, L., Pratesi, C.A. (2021). Design Thinking to Engage Consumers in Achieving Zero Waste Food Experiences: The CEASE Framework. In: Batat, W. (eds) Design Thinking for Food Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54296-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics