Abstract
Drawing on my Ph.D. research into everyday eating in the aftermath of Tokyo Electric Power Company’s 2011 nuclear disaster, in this chapter I propose vital institutional ethnography as a method of inquiry for studying how ruling relations are enacted in response to a messy trouble of the Anthropocene. Borrowing sensibilities from both institutional ethnography and material semiotics, vital institutional ethnography encourages scholars to trace textually-mediated ruling relations their study participants are embedded within, while simultaneously attending to the materiality of pollutants and other human and more-than-human entanglements contributing to situated experiences of disorder. Through theoretical discussions and examples from my Ph.D. thesis, I illustrate how vital institutional ethnography offers an opportunity for scholars to creatively attend to questions of social justice and response-ability when researching messy, uneven experiences and realities, and to discover innovative ways of grappling with some of the most perplexing challenges we face in the Anthropocene.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bessire, L., & Bond, D. (2014). Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist, 41(3), 440–456.
Burch, K. A. (2018). Eating a nuclear disaster: A vital institutional ethnography of everyday eating in the aftermath of Tokyo Electric Power Company’s Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant disaster (Doctoral dissertation). University of Otago.
Burch, K. A. (2019). When overflow is the rule: The evolution of the transnational nuclear assemblage and its technopolitical tools for framing human–radionuclide relationality. Geoforum, 107, 66–76.
Burch, K. A., Legun, K., & Campbell, H. (2018). Not defined by the numbers: Distinction, dissent and democratic possibilities in debating the data. Agri-environmental governance as an assemblage: Multiplicity, power, and transformation (pp. 127–144). New York: Routledge.
Campbell, M. L. (1998). Institutional ethnography and experience as data. Qualitative Sociology, 21(1), 55–73.
Campbell, M. L., & Gregor, F. M. (2004). Mapping social relations: A primer in institutional ethnography. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Carolan, M. S. (2006). Do you see what I see? Examining the epistemic barriers to sustainable agriculture. Rural Sociology, 71(2), 232–260.
DeVault, M. L. (1999). Liberating method: Feminism and social research. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
DeVault, M. L., & McCoy, L. (2002). Institutional ethnography: Using interviews to investigate ruling relations. In J. Gubrium & J. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research (pp. 751–776). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gilbert, S. F. (2017). Holobiont by birth: Multilineage individuals as the concretion of cooperative processes. In A. L. Tsing, H. A. Swanson, E. Gan, & N. Bubandt (Eds.), Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts and monsters of the Anthropocene (pp. M73–M89). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Haraway, D. J. (1994). A game of cat’s cradle: Science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations, 2(1), 59–71.
Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
Latour, B. (1986). Visualisation and cognition: Drawing things together. In E. Long & H. Kuklick (Eds.), Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of culture past and present (Vol. 6, pp. 1–40). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1986). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation and the Portuguese route to India. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 234–263). Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Law, J. (1991). Introduction. A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination (pp. 1–23). London: Routledge.
Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Law, J. (2002). Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press.
Law, J. (2008). On sociology and STS. Sociological Review, 56(4), 623–649.
Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Law, J. (2019, January 30). Material semiotics. Retrieved June 12, 2019, from www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2019MaterialSemiotics.pdf.
Law, J., & Mol, A. (2008). The actor-enacted: Cumbrian sheep in 2001. Politica Y Sociedad, 45(3), 75–92.
Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2005). Object lessons. Organization, 12(3), 331–355.
MacLeod, A., Cameron, P., Ajjawi, R., Kits, O., & Tummons, J. (2019). Actor-network theory and ethnography: Sociomaterial approaches to researching medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(3), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0513-6.
Mazzola, G. G., Mannone, M., Pang, Y., O’Brien, M., & Torunsky, N. (2016). All about music: The complete ontology—Realities, semiotics, communication, and embodiment. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
McCoy, L. (1999). Accounting discourse and textual practices of ruling, a study of institutional transformation and restructuring in higher education (Doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto.
Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics: A word and some questions. Sociological Review, 47(S1), 74–89. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03483.x.
Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft, 50, 253–269.
Murdoch, J. (2001). Ecologising sociology: Actor-network theory, co-construction and the problem of human exemptionalism. Sociology, 35(1), 111–133.
Rankin, J. (2017). Conducting analysis in institutional ethnography: Guidance and cautions. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 160940691773447–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917734472.
Smith, D. E. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. E. (1990). Texts, facts, and femininity: Exploring the relations of ruling. New York: Routledge.
Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the social: Critique, theory, and investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Smith, D. E. (2001). Texts and the ontology of organizations and institutions. Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies, 7(2), 159–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/10245280108523557.
Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional ethnography: A sociology for people. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
Smith, G. W. (1995). Accessing treatments: Managing the AIDS epidemic in Ontario. In M. Campbell & A. Manicom (Eds.), Knowledge, experience, and ruling relations: Studies in the social organization of knowledge (pp. 18–34). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tsing, A. L. (2017). A threat to Holocene resurgence is a threat to livability. In M. Brightman & J. Lewis (Eds.), The anthropology of sustainability (pp. 51–65). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tsing, A. L., Swanson, H. A., Gan, E., & Bubandt, N. (Eds.). (2017). Arts of living on a damaged planet: Ghosts and monsters of the Anthropocene. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Tummons, J. (2010). Institutional ethnography and actor–network theory: A framework for researching the assessment of trainee teachers. Ethnography and Education, 5(3), 345–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2010.511444.
Whatmore, S. (2002). Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burch, K. (2021). Attending to Messy Troubles of the Anthropocene with Institutional Ethnography and Material Semiotics: The Case for Vital Institutional Ethnography. In: Luken, P.C., Vaughan, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Institutional Ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54222-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54222-1_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54221-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54222-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)