Abstract
Neptune was telescopically discovered by Johan Gottfried Galle and Heinrich Louis d’Arrest in Berlin on 23 September 1846 based on the prediction by Urbain Jean Joseph Le Verrier. The role German astronomers played in the discovery has often been overshadowed by the controversies that erupted in England and France after the discovery. However, their role was crucial, not only in bringing about the discovery in the first place, but also in resolving some of the post-discovery controversies that erupted around priority for the prediction and naming of the planet. German astronomers in Central and Eastern Europe possessed some of the best telescopes of the day and had established themselves over several decades as being at the forefront of observational astronomy. They had produced the star charts that in the end proved indispensable for allowing identification of the planet, while a German publication, Astronomische Nachrichten, published by Heinrich Christian Schumacher in Altona, in the vicinity of Hamburg, then part of the Kingdom of Denmark, served as the journal of record during the time period with which these events took place. The general neglect of the German part of the story is most strongly attested by the inaccuracies concerning what actually happened on discovery night, which were long propagated in the English-speaking literature. Notably, for 30 years after the discovery, it was not appreciated that there were two observers, while the role of the sky map used was often exaggerated. This chapter sets forth a more complete picture, and in particular emphasises more than previous accounts the critical role of d’Arrest, arguing that he should be celebrated as a co-discoverer. In addition, evidence presented here, much of it not previously available in the English-speaking literature, shows that the name “Neptune” was eventually accepted throughout the scientific community based on German precedents.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
When Bessel was moving to Lilienthal, Kulenkamp & Sons offered him a salary of 700 Thalers per year, while for the appointment in Königsberg he got 800 Thalers per year together with a house and heating expenses covered (Schmeidler, 1984:18). This could be compared with the wages (Wulf, 2016:124) of a skilled worker (up to 200 Thalers per year), Alexander von Humboldt’s pension by the King of Prussia (2,500 Thalers per year) and Wilhelm von Humboldt’s salary as the ambassador in Rome (13,400 Thalers per year). When Johan Franz Encke became the director of the Berlin Observatory in 1825, he had a salary of 2,000 Thalers, of which 300 Thalers he earned as the secretary of the Berlin Royal Academy of Sciences, but his compensation did not include the accommodation (Bruhns, 1869:115).
- 2.
Estimated expenses were 3,000 Thalers, of which 2,000 Thalers would go as prizes to astronomers (Hamel 1989).
- 3.
See the same reference for a discussion why there was a persistent statement in the literature that Neptune was found “within one degree” when the discrepancy is actually larger than a degree.
- 4.
Dreyer’s 1882 recollection was inaccurate concerning one telescope. Harvard’s 15-inch (38-cm) Merz and Mahler refractor was not mounted until June 1847. In September 1846, the largest telescope in the United States was the 11-inch (28-cm) Merz and Mahler refractor at the Cincinnati Observatory (see Chap. 9).
- 5.
Encke’s report of the discovery (Encke 1846), lists 22:52 for the first observation of Neptune with the precisely determined coordinates. There are three more observations at 23:47, 00:52 and 01:08, with Galle listed for the first three and Encke for the last one. It is however likely that the planet was discovered before these scientifically reported measurements.
- 6.
Another person that got awarded for the discovery of Neptune was Carl Bremiker. On the personal request of Encke, Bremiker was awarded with the Gold, Silver and Bronze Leibniz Medals of the Royal Academy of Berlin: (Bruhns 1869: 122–123).
- 7.
For the sake of completeness, the four illustrious names are also given to main belt asteroids, 1996 Adams (1961), 1997 Le Verrier (1963), 2097 Galle (1953) and 9133 d’Arrest (1960), where the number in parentheses is the year of discovery.
- 8.
This paper is somewhat more scientific version of the paper Challis published in The Athenaeum (Challis 1846a), but it does not contain any mention of the Challis’s and Adams’s suggestion of the name “Oceanus.” It seems that Challis initially wanted the suggested name to appear in the Astronomische Nachrichten , but Schumacher told Airy that it was omitted because Challis had requested that part be removed from the printed version (Schumacher to Airy, 11 December 1846).
References
Abhandlungen der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, 1845, In der Dieterichschen Buchhandlung, Göttingen.
Adams, J. C., 1846, An explanation of the Observed Irregularities in the Motion of Uranus, on the Hypothesis of a Disturbance Caused by a More Distant Planet; with a Determination of the Mass, Orbit and Position of the Disturbing Body, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 7, 149.
Airy, G.B., 1846a, Account of some circumstances historically connected with the discovery of the Planet exterior to Uranus, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 7, 121.
Airy, G.B., 1846b, Account of some circumstances historically connected with the discovery of the Planet exterior to Uranus, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 133.
Airy, G.B. to H.C. Schumacher, 9 December 1846, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Handschriftenabteilung, Nachlass Schumacher.
Airy, G.B., 1847a, Account of some circumstances historically connected with the discovery of the Planet exterior to Uranus, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 149.
Airy, G. B., 1847b, Name of the New Planet, The Athenaeum, No.1008, 20 February
Airy, G. B., 1896, Autobiography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Arago, F., 1846, A note in Our Weekly Gossip column of The Athenaeum, No. 989, 10 October, 1046
d’Arrest, H.L, 1846, Bestimmung der Elemente der Astraea mit Rüksicht auf die Störungen aus der ganzen Reihe der Beobachtungen, Astronomische Nachrichten (in German), 24, 277.
Bessel, F. W., 1810, ‘Untersuchungen über die scheinbare und wahre Bahn des im Jahre 1807 erschienenen grossen Kometen’ (in German), Königsberg.
Bessel, F. W., 1823a, Untersuchung einer merckwürdigen Erscheinung, welche die Bewegung des Uranus gezeigt hat, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Handschriftenabteilung, Ms. Germ quart. 2266.
Bessel, F.W., 1823b, ‘Nachricht von einer auf der Königsberger Sternwarte angefangenen allgemeinen Beobachtung des Himmels’, Astronomische Nachrichten (in German), 1, 257.
Bessel, F.W., 1826, ‘Einige Bemerkungen über die Entwerfung der vollständigen Himmelskarten’, Astronomische Nachrichten (in German), 4, 437.
Bessel, F.W., 1831, ‘Ueber den Einfluss eines widerstehenden Mittels auf die Bewegung eines Pendels’, Astronomische Nachrichten (in German), 9, 221.
Bessel, F. W., 1832, ‘Versuche Über die Kraft, mit welcher die Erde Körper von verschiedner Beschaffenhelt anzieht’, Annalen der Physik und Chemie, Berlin: J. Ch. Poggendorff, 25, 401.
Bessel, F. W., 1838 ‘Bestimmung der Entfernung des 61sten Sterns des Schwans’ [Determination of the distance to 61 Cygni]. Astronomische in German), 16, 65–96.
Bessel, F. W., 1844a ‘Ueber Veränderlichkeit der eigenen Bewegungen der Fixsterne’ [On Variations of the proper motions of the fixed stars]. Astronomische Nachrichten (in German). 22 (514): 145–160.
Bessel, F. W., 1844b. ‘Ueber Veränderlichkeit der eigenen Bewegungen der Fixsterne. (Fortsetzung)’ [On Variations of the proper motions of the fixed stars (continued)]. Astronomische Nachrichten(in German). 22 (515): 169–184.
Bessel, F.W., 1848, Populäre Vorlesungen über wissenschaftliche Gegenstände, Herausgegeben von H. C. Schumacher. Hamburg.
Biermann, K. R., 1979, Briefwecshel zwischen Alexander von Humboldt und Heinrich Christian Schumacher, Beitrage zur Alexander-von-Himboldt-Forschung, Vol. 6, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin
Bode, J, E., 1801, Uranographia, sive astrorum descriptio viginti tabulis aeneis incisa ex recentissimis et absolutissimis Astronomorum observationibus, Berlin.
Bouvard, A., 1821, Tables astronomiques publièes par le bureau des longitudes de France: contenant les tables de Jupiter, de Saturne et d'Uranus, construites d'après la Thèorie de la mècanique celeste, Bacler et Huzard, Paris.
Briefwechsel zwischen, Gauss, C. F. und Schumacher, H. C. 1863a, edited by Peters, C. A.F. Esch, Altona 1863, Volume 4.
Briefwechsel zwischen, Gauss, C. F. und Schumacher, H. C. 1863b, edited Peters, C. A. F. Esch, Altona 1863, Volume 5.
Briefwechsel zwischen Gauss und Bessel, 1880, Veranlassung der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Bruhns, C., 1869, Johann Franz Encke, Sein Leben und Wirken, Leipzig, 115, 122–123, 191.
Cataloge zu den 24 Stunden der akademischen Sternkarten für 15° südlicher bis 15° nördlicher Abweichung, 1859, Herausgeben von der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Berlin.
Centenaire de la naissance de U. J. J. La Verrier, 1911, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (Académie des Scienecs, text by Bigourdan, G).
Challis, J., 1846a, The New Planet, The Athenaeum, No.909, 17 October,1069.
Challis, J., 1846b, ‘Schreiben des Herrn Professors Challis, Directors der Cambridger Sternwarte, an den Herausgeber’ Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 101.
Challis, J., 1846c, ‘Schreiben des Herrn Professors Challis, Directors der Cambridger Sternwarte, an den Herausgeber’ Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 105.
Chapman, A., 2017, The Victorian amateur astronomer, 2nd edition, Gracewing, Leominster
Danjon, A., 1946, Le centenaire de la decuverte de Naptune, Ciel et Terre, 62, 369.
Dick, W. R., 1985, Dokumente aus der Dorpater Zeit Wilhelm Struves in der Charkower Sternwarte, Tartu Astr. Obs. Teated Nr. 75, 5.
Dick, W. R., 1986, Zur Auffindung des Planeten Neptun an der Berliner Sternwarte im September 1846, Die Sterne, 62, 251–257.
de Pater, I et al. 2018, The rings of Neptune, Planetary Ring Systems. Properties, Structure, and Evolution, Edited by M.S. Tiscareno and C.D. Murray. Cambridge University Press, 2018, p. 112-124.
Doppelmayr, J, G., 1742, Atlas coelestis, Sumptibus Heredum Homannianorum, Nurnberg
Dreyer, J. L, E., 1876, Heinrich Luis d’Arrest, Vierteljahrsschr. Astron. Ges. 11, 1.
Dreyer, J. L. E., 1882, Historical note concerning the discovery of Neptune, Copernicus, 2, 63–64.
Dunkley, J., 2018, Our Universe: An Astronomer’s Guide, The Belknap Press of Harvard Univeristy Press, Cambridge.
Encke, F. J., 1836, Schreiben des Herrn Professors und Ritters Encke, Directors der Sternwarte in Berlin, an den Herausgeber, Astronomische Nachrichten, 13, 161.
Encke, F. J., 1837, Schreiben des Herrn Professors und Ritters Encke, Directors der Sternwarte in Berlin, an den Herausgeber, Astronomische Nachrichten, 15, 17.
Encke, F. J., 1846, Schreiben des herrn Encke an den Herausbeger, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 49.
Encke, F. J., 1847, Vortrag, den Herr Prof. Encke am 22sten Octb. d. J. in der Königl. Acad. der Wissensch. über den neuen Planeten gehalten hat, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 191, 196.
Everett, E, 1847, On the New Planet Neptune, Astronomische Nachrichten, 26, 375
Flamsteed, J., 1729, Atlas coelestis, London.
Foerster, W., 1911, Johann Gottfried Galle, Vierteljahrsschr. Astron. Ges., 20, 46, 17.
Galle, J. G., to Le Verrier, J. J. U., 25 September 1846, Bibliothèque de l’Observatoire de Paris; also partially published in Centenaire, p. 19, Grosser (1962: 119) and Wattenberg (1963: 50).
Galle, J. G., 1851, Einige Messungen der Durchmesser des Saturns und der Ringe desselben 1838 und 1839 auf der Berliner Sternwarte, nebst Bemerkungen über den schon damals wahrgeuommenen dunkeln inneren Ring, Astronomische Nachrichten, 32, 187.
Galle, J.G., 1873, Über die Anwendung von Beobachtungen der kleinen Planeten zur Ermittlung des Werthes der Sonnen-Paralaxe, mit besonderer Rücksicht auf die diesjährige Opposition der Phocäa, Astronomische Nachrichten, 80, 1.
Galle, J.G., 1875, Über eine Bestimmung der Sonnen-Parallaxe aus correspondirenden Beobachtungen des Planeten Flora auf mehreren Sternwarten der nördlichen und südlichen Halbkugel im Oct. u. Nov. 1873, Maruschke & Berendt, Breslau.
Galle, J. G., 1877, Ein Nachtrag zu den in Band 25 und dem Ergäzungshefte von 1849 der Astr. Nachrichten enthalten Berichten über die erste Auffindung des Planeten Neptun, Astronomische Nachrichten 89, 349–352.
Galle, J. G., 1882a, Einige nachträgliche ergänzende Bemerkungen in Betreff der Auffindung des Planeten Neptune und der Beobachtungen des dunkeln Saturnsringes in den Jahren 1838 u. 1839, Astronomische Nachrichten, 101, 219, 221.
Galle, J. G., 1882b, Über die esrte Auffindung des Planeten Neptune, Copernicus, 2, 96.
Gapaillard, 2015, By how much did Le Verrier err on the position of Neptune? Journal for the History of Astronomy, 46, 48, 96.
Grosser, M., 1962, The discovery of Neptune, Dover Publication, Inc. New York.
Gyldén, H., 1877, Die Grundlehren der Astronomie, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Hamel, J., 1984a, Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel, BSB B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
Hamel, J., 1984b, Bessels Hypothese der spezifichen gravitation und das problem der Uranusbewegung, Die Sterne, 60, 278, 281, 282.
Hamel, J., 1989, Bessels Projekt der Berliner Akademischen Sternkarten, Die Sterne, 65, 11.
Harding, K. L., 1822, ‘Atlas novus coelestis XXVII Tabulis Continens Stellas Inter Polum Borealem et Trigesimum Gradual Declinationis Observatas’, Göttingen.
Henry, J., Walker S. C., 1847, Schreiben des Herrn J. Henry, Secretairs der Smithsonian Institution an den Herausgeber, Astronomische Nachrichten, 26, 65.
Herrmann, D. B., 1973, Zur Statistik der Sternwartengründungen im 19. Jahrhundert, Die Sterne, 49, 48.
Herschel, J., 1846, Le Verrier’s Planet, The Athenaeum, No 988, 1019 October 3.
Holland, H., 1872, Recollections of past life, D. Appleton & Company, New York
Hubbell, J. G, and Smith, R. W., 1992, Neptune In America: Negotiating a Discovery, Journal for the History of Astronomy, 22, 51, 261–91, 278.
Knobloch, E., 2013, Es wäre mir unmöglich nur ein halbes Jahr so zu leben wie er: Encke, Humboldt und was wir schon immer über die neue Berliner Sternwarte wissen wollten, HiN, XIV, 26, 49–50, 59.
Lalande, J., 1801, Histoire Céleste Française, L’Imprimerie de La République, Paris
Lassell, W., 1847, Schreiben der Herrn Lassell an der Herausgeber, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 197.
Lequeux, J., 2013, Le Verrier – Magnificent and Detestable Astronomer, Springer, New York. Heidelberg Dordrecht London.
Le Verrier, U.J.J., 1843, CRAS 16.
Le Verrier, U.J.J., to Airy, G.B., 28 June 1846, RGO 6/96a, Fos. 127–129.
Le Verrier, U.J.J., to Schumacher, H.C., 30 June 1846, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Handschriftenabteilung, Nachlass Schumacher.
Le Verrier U.J.J., to Galle J.G., 1 October 1846, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Handschriftenabteilung, Nachlass Schumacher.
Le Verrier, U. J. J., to H. C. Schumacher 1 October 1846, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Handschriftenabteilung, Nachlass Schumacher.
Le Verrier, U.J, J., 1846a, Recherches sur les mouvements d’Uranus, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 53.
Le Verrier, U.J.J., 1846b, Recherches sur les mouvements d’Uranus, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 65.
Le Verrier, U.J.J., 1846c, Recherches sur les mouvements d’Uranus, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 85.
Le Verrier, U.J.J., to H. C. Schumacher, 7 January 1847a, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Handschriftenabteilung, Nachlass Schumacher.
Le Verrier, U.J.J., to H. C. Schumacher, 16 March 1847b, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin, Handschriftenabteilung, Nachlass Schumacher.
von Lindenau, B., 1848, Beitrag zur Geschichte der Neptuns-Entdeckung, Ergänzungs-heft zu den Astronomichen Nachrichten, Altona, 12, 235.
Newcomb, S., 1878, Popular Astronomy, MacMillan and Co, London.
Newcomb, S., 1881, Pöpuläre Astronomie, Deutsche vermehrte Ausgabe bearbeitet durch Rud. Engelmann, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Newcomb, S., 1892, Newcomb-Engelmanns Pöpuläre Astronomie, Zweite vermehrte Ausgabe herausgegeben von Dr. H.C. Vogel, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Newcomb, S., 1905, Newcomb-Engelmanns Pöpuläre Astronomie, Zweite vermehrte Ausgabe herausgegeben von Dr. H.C. Vogel, Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
Nichol, J. P., 1849, The Planet Neptune: an Exposition and History, James Nichol, H. Bailliere, Edinburgh.
Obituary Notices: Fellows, 1927, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 81, 257.
Olson, R.J.M., and Pasachoff, J.M., 2019, Cosmos: the art and science of the universe, Reaktion Books, London.
Piazzi, G., 1814, Precipuarum Stellarum Inerrantium Positiones Mediae ineunte Seculo XIX, Panormi
Peirce, B., 1848, Über die Störungen des Neptuns, Astronomische Nachrichten, 27, 215.
Scheiner, J., 1893, Die Astronomie des Unsichtbaren, Himmel und Erde, Bd 5, 20–28.
Schmeidler, F., 1984, Leben und Werk des Königsberger Astronomen Friedrich Wilhem Bessel, 1984, ILMA-Verlag, Kelkheim/T.
Schumacher, H.C., 1826, Entwurf zu einer Herausgabe neuer Himmelskarten, Astronomische Nachrichten, 4, 291.
Schumacher, H.C., 1846, Name des neuen Planeten, Astronomische Nachrichten, 25, 81.
Schumacher, H.C., 1850, Reduction der in Greenwich, Paris und Königsberg gemachten. Beobachtungen des Uranus, von 1781–1837, Astronomische Nachrichten, 30, Nr. 705, 145–182; Beil. Zu Nr. 708, 193.
Schumacher, H.C., to G.B. Airy, 11 December 1846a, RGO 6/96a, Fo. 316r.
Schumacher, H.C., to G.B. Airy, 18 December 1846b, RGO 6/96a, Fo. 330–331.
See T.J.J., 1910, Leverrier’s letter to Galle and the discovery of Neptune, Popular Astronomy, 18. 475.
Smart, W.M., 1946, John Couch Adams and the discovery of Neptune, Nature, 158, 648.
Smyth, W.H.. to Airy, G.B., 5 December 1846, RGO, 6/96a, Fo. 295r.
Standage, T., 2000, The Neptune File: A story of Astronomical Rivalry and the pioneers of Planet Hunting, Walker & Company, New York.
Staubermann, K., 2006, Excercising patience: on the reconstruction of F.W. Bessel’s early star chart observations, Journal for History of Astronomy, 27, 28, 37, 19.
Steinheil, C., 1826., ‘Beschreibung eines Apparats, welcher zur Einzeichnung der astronomisch bestimmten Sterne, in die vollständigen Himmelskarten (A. N. Nr. 88) angewandt worden ist’, Astronomische Nachrichten, 4, 443.
Struve, W., to G. B. Airy 1847, 23 January (07 February) 1847, RGO 6/96a, Fo. 424.
Struve, W., 1848, ‘Sur la denomination de La Planete Nouvellement Decouverte’, Bulletin de La Classe Physico-Mathématique de l’Académie Impériale de Sciences de St-Pétersbourg, Vol. 6–7. p.77 – 80 (dated 17 (29) December 1846; received 11 January 1847)
Turner, H.H., 1911., ‘Obituary notice of Johann Gottfried Galle’, Monthly Notices to the Royal Astronomical Society, 71, 275.
Wattenberg, D., 1946, Die Entdeckung des Planeten Neptun auf der Berliner Sternwarte vor 100 Jahren, Die Naturwissenschaften, 33, 129.
Wattenberg, D., 1959, Fr. W. Bessel und die Vorgeschichte der Entdeckung des Neptun, Mitt. D. Archenhold-Sternwarte, Nr. 54.
Wattenberg, D., 1962, Der Streit um den Namen des Planeten Neptun, Vorträge u. Schriften d. Archnhold-Sternwarte, Nr. 10, Berlin.
Wattenberg, D., 1963, Johann Gottfrid Galle 1812–1910: Leben und Werken eines deutschen Astronomen, Johann Ambrosius Barth Verlag, Leipzig.
Wilson, C. 1985., ‘The Great Inequality of Jupiter and Saturn: from Kepler to Laplace’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, Vol. 33, No. 1/3 (1985), 15–290.
Wulf, Andrea., 2016, The Invention of nature: The Adventures of Alexander von Humboldt, the Lost Hero of Science, John Murray, London.
Acknowledgements
This chapter would not be possible without the help from the librarians of the Leibniz-Institut für Astrophysik-Potsdam (AIP), Regina von Berlepsch and Melissa Thies. Thank you for your indefatigable and very resourceful support. A special thanks goes to the director of AIP, Matthias Steinmetz, who introduced me to the intricate details of the Neptune discovery some years ago over a good dinner in Lyon. I would also like to thank Wolfgang Dick for pointing me to the location of Galle’s letters and useful discussions. Sabine Thater helped with translations from German originals, while Damien Le Borgne for initial and James Lequeux for final translations of Le Verrier’s and Galle’s letters from the French. James, thank you for being so responsive. I had several stimulating email exchanges with a number of co-writers of this book, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I would like to thank Brian Sheen for inviting me to join the project, and the editors William Sheehan, Robert W. Smith, Carolyn Kennett and Trudy E. Bell for many inspiring thoughts and patience in waiting for my contribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krajnović, D. (2021). “That Star is Not on the Map”: The German Side of the Discovery. In: Sheehan, W., Bell, T.E., Kennett, C., Smith, R. (eds) Neptune: From Grand Discovery to a World Revealed. Historical & Cultural Astronomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54218-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54218-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54217-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54218-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)