Skip to main content

Multimodal Social Semiotics and Learning Design: In Search of Interdisciplinarity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intersections Across Disciplines

Abstract

In a seminal article, former linguist and semiotician Kress and his colleague van Leeuwen (Front pages: the (critical) analysis of newspaper layout. (In Bell A, Garrett, P (eds) Approaches to media discourse. Blackwell, London, pp 186–219, 1998) began to explain multimodal texts – texts which include a complex mixture of words and images. An interesting gap arising out of the work of Kress and his colleagues was their realization of multimodal texts and how meaning cannot be reduced to language only. In an attempt to address this gap, based on Michael Halliday’s (Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold, London, 1978) functional model of language, a theory called multimodal social semiotic theory was formed by extending the theory of meaning beyond language (Kress G, van Leeuwen T, Reading images: the grammar of graphic design. Routledge, London, 1996). In other words, the meaning-making capacity of various modes (functions) such as music, sound, action, and visual communication is regarded as crucial as the language itself. In this paper, the foundations of the multimodal theory of communication and its implications for the field of learning design will be discussed.

Without integrative disciplines of understanding, communication, and action, there is little hope of sensibly extending knowledge beyond the library or laboratory in order to serve the purpose of enriching human life.

Buchanan (1992, p. 6)

In memory of Gunther R. Kress (1940–2019)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becoming Homeless: A Human Experience. (2017). Retrieved from Stanford University Virtual Human Interaction Lab, https://vhil.stanford.edu/becominghomeless/

  • Bezemer, J., & Jewitt, C. (2009). Multimodal analysis: Key issues. In L. Litosseliti (Ed.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 180–197). London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezemer, J., Jewitt, C., Diamantopoulou, S., Kress, G., & Mavers, D. (2012). Using a social semiotic approach to multimodality: Researching learning in Schools, Museums and Hospitals. NCRM Working Paper, NCRM, http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/2258/4/NCRM_working_paper_0112.pdf

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haratyan, F. (2011). Halliday’s SFL and social meaning. In 2nd international conference on Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences IPEDR, 17 (pp. 260–264).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, B. (2013). Kress on Kress: Using a method to read a life. In M. Böck & N. Pachler (Eds.), Multimodality and social semiotics: Communication, meaning making, and learning in the work of Gunther Kress (pp. 7–16). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy, learning: A multimodal approach. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1997). Before writing: Rethinking the paths to literacy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (1998). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder & M. Joyce (Eds.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 53–79). Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2014a). The rhetorical work of shaping the semiotic world. In A. Archer & D. Newfield (Eds.), Multimodal approaches to research and pedagogy: Recognition, resources, and access (pp. 131–152). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2014b). Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning. In C. Lutkewitte (Ed.), Multimodal composition: A critical sourcebook (pp. 283–301). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G. (2019). Pedagogy as design: A social semiotic approach to learning as communication. Universitas Tarraconensis. Revista de Ciències de l’Educació, 1(2), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2018.2.2488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & Bezemer, J. (2015). A social semiotic multimodal approach to learning. In E. Hargreaves & D. Scott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of learning (pp. 155–168). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of graphic design. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1998). Front pages: The (critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In A. Bell & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to media discourse (pp. 186–219). London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Visual interaction. In A. Jaworski & N. Coupland (Eds.), The discourse reader (2nd ed., pp. 362–384). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manghani, S., Piper, A., & Simons, J. (Eds.). (2006). Images: A reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piattelli-Palmarini, M. (1980). Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Begüm Saçak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saçak, B. (2021). Multimodal Social Semiotics and Learning Design: In Search of Interdisciplinarity. In: Hokanson, B., Exter, M., Grincewicz, A., Schmidt, M., Tawfik, A.A. (eds) Intersections Across Disciplines. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53875-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53875-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53874-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53875-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics