Abstract
The short prologue of Volume 2 of the book is intended to remind us that the danger/injury model, proposed 25 years ago, is slowly outdated in light of continuously advancing scientific research and, thus, is worth modifying. As an example of steadily growing knowledge, a glance is taken to a holistic view of the universal defense system, as it can be discussed today. The evolutionarily developed defense program is dominated by cell stress/tissue injury-induced damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), which are sensed/recognized by pattern recognition molecules expressed by cells of the innate immune system to trigger life-sustaining/life-saving defense responses. Four major mammalian defense responses are distinguished: (1) the innate immune response in terms of an inflammatory response; (2) the adaptive immune response in terms of a specific T- and B-cell response; (3) the mechanically induced innate response in terms of a conversion of mechanical forces into physiological responses; and (4) the fight-or-flight response in terms of a rapid physical response in the face of danger. Further, a short note is devoted to the unique capacity of DAMPs not only to activate proinflammatory cells but also to modulate innate immune cells by changing their phenotype from inflammation-promoting to inflammation-resolving traits. Finally, growing evidence from modern evolutionary research is touched suggesting that all living creatures and organisms on our planet use the DAMPs to induce defense responses needed for their daily “struggle for life”: from plants over invertebrates up to vertebrates including mammals and humans, “DAMPs across the tree of life.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Land W, Schneeberger H, Schleibner S, Illner WD, Abendroth D, Rutili G, et al. The beneficial effect of human recombinant superoxide dismutase on acute and chronic rejection events in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. Transplantation. 1994;57:211–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8310510.
Matzinger P. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu Rev Immunol. 1994;12:991–1045. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8011301.
Tank AW, Lee WD. Peripheral and central effects of circulating catecholamines. Compr Physiol. 2015;5:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c140007.
Gupta A, Singh V. GPCR signaling in C. elegans and its implications in immune response. Adv Immunol. 2017;136:203–26. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065277617300317.
Land WG. Damage-associated molecular patterns in human diseases. In: Injury-induced innate immune responses, vol. 1. Cham: Springer International Publishing AG; 2018. https://www.springer.com/de/book/9783319786544.
Fridlender ZG, Sun J, Kim S, Kapoor V, Cheng G, Ling L, et al. Polarization of tumor-associated neutrophil phenotype by TGF-β: “N1” versus “N2” TAN. Cancer Cell. 2009;16:183–94. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1535610809002153.
Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:451–83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19105661.
Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13.
Dalli J, Serhan C. Macrophage proresolving mediators—the when and where. Microbiol Spectr. 2016;4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27337457.
Prame Kumar K, Nicholls AJ, Wong CHY. Partners in crime: neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages in inflammation and disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2018;371:551–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-017-2753-2.
Halade GV, Norris PC, Kain V, Serhan CN, Ingle KA. Splenic leukocytes define the resolution of inflammation in heart failure. Sci Signal. 2018;11:eaao1818. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29511119.
Kapellos TS, Iqbal AJ. Epigenetic control of macrophage polarisation and soluble mediator gene expression during inflammation. Mediators Inflamm. 2016;2016:1–15. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27143818.
Crisan TO, Netea MG, Joosten LAB. Innate immune memory: implications for host responses to damage-associated molecular patterns. Eur J Immunol. 2016;46:817–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201545497.
Bekkering S, Quintin J, Joosten LAB, van der Meer JWM, Netea MG, Riksen NP. Oxidized low-density lipoprotein induces long-term proinflammatory cytokine production and foam cell formation via epigenetic reprogramming of monocytes. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2014;34:1731–8. https://doi.org/10.1161/ATVBAHA.114.303887.
Schnack L, Sohrabi Y, Lagache SMM, Kahles F, Bruemmer D, Waltenberger J, et al. Mechanisms of trained innate immunity in oxLDL primed human coronary smooth muscle cells. Front Immunol. 2019;10:13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728822.
Neidhart M, Pajak A, Laskari K, Riksen NP, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, et al. Oligomeric S100A4 is associated with monocyte innate immune memory and bypass of tolerance to subsequent stimulation with lipopolysaccharides. Front Immunol. 2019;10:791. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31037071.
Heil M, Land WG. Danger signals—damaged-self recognition across the tree of life. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5:578. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25400647.
Heil M, Land WG, Tör M. Editorial: wound recognition across the tree of life. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:1319. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27635126.
Darwin C. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, The preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Mineola, NY: Dover; 2006. https://www.google.de/search?
De Lorenzo G, Ferrari S, Cervone F, Okun E. Extracellular DAMPs in plants and mammals: immunity, tissue damage and repair. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:937–50.
Soo TCC, Devadas S, Mohamed Din MS, Bhassu S. Differential transcriptome analysis of the disease tolerant Madagascar–Malaysia crossbred black tiger shrimp, Penaeus monodon hepatopancreas in response to acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) infection: inference on immune gene response and in. Gut Pathog. 2019;11:39.
El Chamy L, Leclerc V, Caldelari I, Reichhart JM. Sensing of “danger signals” and pathogen-associated molecular patterns defines binary signaling pathways “upstream” of toll. Nat Immunol. 2008;9:1165–70.
Ming M, Obata F, Kuranaga E, Miura M. Persephone/Spätzle pathogen sensors mediate the activation of toll receptor signaling in response to endogenous danger signals in apoptosis-deficient Drosophila. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:7558–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Land, W.G. (2020). Perspectives of the Danger/Injury Model in Immunology. In: Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Human Diseases . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53868-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53868-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53867-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53868-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)