Abstract
Discourses about the relationship between religion and science, whether viewed as one of conflict or compatibility, abound. Scientists, religious scholars and researchers, in peer-reviewed publications, through lectures, and even via social media, debate the truth claims of each “field” and propose ways to integrate, or alternatively, marginalize the deliverables of one type of knowing with respect to the other. In recent years these debates have made their way into Muslim circles as scientists and religious scholars assess how Western philosophical and Christian perspectives compare with Islamic understandings of science and religion. These scholars further grapple with developing frameworks for integration and resolution of potential conflicts between faith and modern science. At present much of these discussions appear broad and superficial; invoking thin conceptions of Islam and science. This has resulted in piecemeal solutions for boundary negotiation between the claims of tradition and claims of modern science. As scholarly work at the intersection of Islam and the biomedical sciences increases this paper anticipates a deeper engagement. We advocate that conceptions of Islam and of science be defined at the outset in a substantive way so that fruitful dialogue can occur, and we propose that the Islamic portion of the dialogue should be set at the level of particular theological and legal schools. Engaging modern science from within a particular Islamic school allows for fundamental Islamic metaphysical and doctrinal commitments to be foregrounded, and in so doing facilitates negotiation about how empirical findings and posited knowledge about nature can be accommodated by established theological frameworks and legal authority structures within the Islamic intellectual tradition.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Gould (1999), 6.
- 3.
Gutas (2003): 215–220.
- 4.
Iqbal (2003): 223.
- 5.
Iqbal (2003): 221–234.
- 6.
Matthews (1994), 164.
- 7.
Ibid., 163.
- 8.
Grant (2007), 105–106.
- 9.
Hall (2001), 297–336.
- 10.
Cunningham and Williams (1993): 407–432.
- 11.
Mayr (2007), 171–193.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
Al-Sanūsī (2019), 111–146.
- 17.
- 18.
Al-Sanūsī (2019), 242–43.
- 19.
Sabra (1994): 41 (emphasis ours).
References
Brooke, John Hedley. 2014. Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brooke, John Hedley, and Ronald L. Numbers, eds. 2011. Science and Religion around the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cunningham, Andrew, and Perry Williams. 1993. ‘De-Centring the “Big Picture”: “The Origins of Modern Science” and the Modern Origins of Science.’ The British Journal for the History of Science 26 (4): 407–432.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1999. Rocks of Ages: Science and Religion in the Fullness of Life. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
Grant, Edward. 2007. A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gutas, Dimitri. 2003. ‘Islam and Science: A False Statement of the Problem.’ Islam and Science 1 (2): 215–220.
Hall, Robert E. 2001. ‘Mechanics.’ In Science and Technology in Islam, Part 1: The Exact and Natural Sciences, eds. A. Y. al-Hassan, Maqbul Ahmed, and A. Z. Iskandar. Paris: UNESCO.
al-Ījī, ʿAḍud al-Dīn. 1938. Mawāqif fī ʿilm al-kalām, eds. Ibrāhīm al-Dasūqī ʿAṭiyya and Aḥmad Muḥammad al-Ḥanbūlī. Silsilat Maṭbūʿāt fī ʿIlm al-Kalām, no. 1. Cairo: Maṭbaʿat al-ʿUlūm.
Iqbal, Muzaffar. 2003. ‘Islam and Science: Responding to a False Approach.’ Islam and Science 1 (2): 221–234.
Matthews, Michael R. 1994. Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science. New York, NY: Routledge.
Mayr, Ernst. 2007. What Makes Biology Unique?: Considerations on the Autonomy of a Scientific Discipline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morvillo, Nancy. 2010. Science and Religion: Understanding the Issues. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Sabra, Abdelhamid I. 1994. ‘Science and Philosophy in Medieval Islamic Theology: The Evidence of the Fourteenth Century.’ Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Arabishe-Islamishen Wissenshaften 9: 1–42.
al-Sanūsī. 2019. Sharḥ al-muqaddimāt, ed. Anas Muḥammad ʿAdnān al-Sharafāwī. Damascus: Dār al-Taqwá.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qureshi, O., al-Akiti, A., Padela, A.I. (2022). Islam and Science: Reorienting the Discourse. In: al-Akiti, A., Padela, A.I. (eds) Islam and Biomedicine. Philosophy and Medicine, vol 137. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53801-9_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53801-9_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53800-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53801-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)