Skip to main content

Education and Training in Pancreatic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Pancreatic Cancer
  • 2682 Accesses

Abstract

Exposure to pancreatic surgery during general surgery residency is insufficient for independent HPB practice in the majority of centres. High quality post-certification HPB fellowships can be readily accessed by a number of well-defined routes and are strongly recommended to achieve the experience and operative volumes required for autonomous management of patients with pancreatic cancer. The International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) and its regional Associations seek to improve education and training in pancreatic surgery and oversee the quality of such fellowships through accreditation. Summative assessment or formal certification is not provided by all schemes but may be beneficial to aid institutions when appointing candidates to career-grade posts that involve complex pancreatic practice. Evidence suggests that the presence of an HPB subspecialty fellow is not detrimental to the training of local residents and may contribute to enhanced outcomes for patients. The role of eLearning and social media in the education and training of pancreatic surgery is rapidly evolving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sachs TE, Ejaz A, Weiss M, et al. Assessing the experience in complex hepatopancreatobiliary surgery among graduating chief residents: is the operative experience enough? Surgery. 2014;156(2):385–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bell RH, Biester TW, Tabuenca A, et al. Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience. Ann Surg. 2009;249(5):719–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cortez AR, Winer LK, Katsaros GD, et al. Resident operative experience in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: exposing the divide. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24(4):796–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Robson AJ, Parks RW. HPB fellowship training: consensus and convergence. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(5):397–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. https://www.essoweb.org/mission-and-vision/.

  6. D’Angelica MI, Chapman WC. HPB surgery: the specialty is here to stay, but the training is in evolution. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(7):2123–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Altieri MS, Yang J, Yin D, et al. Presence of a fellowship improves perioperative outcomes following hepatopancreatobiliary procedures. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(7):2918–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McColl RJ, Shaheen AA, Brar B, et al. Survival after hepatic resection: impact of surgeon training on long-term outcome. Can J Surg. 2013;56(4):256–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark W, Hernandez J, McKeon BA, et al. Surgery residency training programmes have greater impact on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy than hospital volume or surgeon frequency. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12(1):68–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hammond Mobilio M, Brydges R, Patel P, et al. Struggles with autonomy: exploring the dual identities of surgeons and learners in the operating room. Am J Surg. 2020;219(2):233–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zyromski NJ, Torbeck L, Canal DF, et al. Incorporating an HPB fellowship does not diminish surgical residents' HPB experience in a high-volume training centre. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12(2):123–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rassadi R, Dickerman RM, Dunn EL, et al. Hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery: what is the right fellowship for the right training? J Surg Educ. 2008;65(3):186–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roberfroid D, Leonard C, Stordeur S. Physician supply forecast: better than peering in a crystal ball? Hum Resour Health. 2009;7:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Minter RM, Alseidi A, Hong JC, et al. Training in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery: assessment of the hepatopancreatobiliary surgery workforce in North America. Ann Surg. 2015;262(6):1065–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scarborough JE, Pietrobon R, Bennett KM, et al. Workforce projections for hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206(4):678–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards JP, Bressan A, Dharampal N, et al. Hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery workforce in Canada. Can J Surg. 2015;58(3):212–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ali N, O'Rourke C, El-Hayek K, et al. Estimating the need for hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgeons in the USA. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(4):352–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pitt HA. International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association: who are we and where are we going? HPB (Oxford). 2006;8(4):243–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Association EaTCftIH-P-B. Standards for hepato-pancreato-biliary training 2008. http://www.ihpba.org/assets/documents/hpb_training_standards.pdf. Accessed 27 Aug 2019.

  20. Jeyarajah DR, Berman RS, Doyle M, et al. Consensus conference on North American training in hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery: a review of the conference and presentation of consensus statements. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(7):2153–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Costa A, Van Hemelryck F, Aparicio A, et al. Continuing medical education in Europe: towards a harmonised system. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46(13):2340–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeyarajah DR, Patel S, Osman H. The current state of hepatopancreatobiliary fellowship experience in North America. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(1):144–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Committee EaT, Association IH-P-B. Curriculum for hepato-pancreato-biliary fellowships 2008. https://www.ihpba.org/media/hpb_curriculum.pdf. Accessed Oct 2019.

  24. Section of Surgery and European Board of Surgery UEdMS. Syallabus UEMS-HPB surgery 2013. https://uemssurg.org/divisions/hpb-surgery/curriculum. Accessed Oct 2019.

  25. Miller A, Archer J. Impact of workplace based assessment on doctors’ education and performance: a systematic review. BMJ. 2010;341:c5064.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Beard JD. Assessment of surgical skills of trainees in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2008;90(4):282–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cogbill TH, Malangoni MA, Potts JR, et al. The general surgery milestones project. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(5):1056–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Norcini J, Burch V. Workplace-based assessment as an educational tool: AMEE Guide No. 31. Med Teach. 2007;29(9):855–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Epstein RM. Assessment in medical education. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(4):387–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. (SCORE) SCoRE. SCORE Curriculum Outline 2017–2018. http://www.absurgery.org/xfer/curriculumoutline2017-18.pdf. Accessed Oct 2019.

  31. Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, et al. Effect of hospital volume, surgeon experience, and surgeon volume on patient outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-institution experience. Arch Surg. 2010;145(7):634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tseng JF, Pisters PW, Lee JE, et al. The learning curve in pancreatic surgery. Surgery. 2007;141(5):694–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Raptis DA, Clavien PA, Committee IH-P-BAIEaT. Evaluation of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary (HPB) fellowships: an international survey of programme directors. HPB (Oxford). 2011;13(4):279–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Education & Training Committee IH-P-BA. Standards for hepato-pancreato-biliary training 2008. http://www.ihpba.org/media/hpb_training_standards.pdf. Accessed Oct 2019.

  35. Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, et al. The Miami international evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hogg ME, Besselink MG, Clavien PA, et al. Training in minimally invasive pancreatic resections: a paradigm shift away from “see one, do one, teach one”. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):234–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Pagkratis S, Cho EE, Lewis F, et al. Expectations of hepato-pancreato-biliary fellows; do we meet them? J Surg Educ. 2019;76(6):1546–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Siddiqui IA, Sastry AV, Martinie JB, et al. Fellows’ perspective of HPB training programs in North America: results of a survey. HPB (Oxford). 2018;20(8):695–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jrearz R, Govindarajan A, Jayaraman S. A survey of current practices and barriers to expanding laparoscopic HPB surgery in Canada. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(1):42–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shouhed D, Gewertz B, Wiegmann D, et al. Integrating human factors research and surgery: a review. Arch Surg. 2012;147(12):1141–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. de Leval MR, Carthey J, Wright DJ, et al. Human factors and cardiac surgery: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119(4 Pt 1):661–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yule J, Hill K, Yule S. Development and evaluation of a patient-centred measurement tool for surgeons' non-technical skills. Br J Surg. 2018;105(7):876–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jung JJ, Yule S, Boet S, et al. Nontechnical skill assessment of the collective surgical team using the non-technical skills for surgeons (NOTSS) system. Ann Surg. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lessin MS, Klein MD. Does research during general surgery residency correlate with academic pursuits after pediatric surgery residency? J Pediatr Surg. 1995;30(9):1310–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Seshadri RM, Ali N, Warner S, et al. Training and practice of the next generation HPB surgeon: analysis of the 2014 AHPBA residents’ and fellows’ symposium survey. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(12):1096–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Warner SG, Alseidi AA, Hong J, et al. What to expect when you’re expecting a hepatopancreatobiliary surgeon: self-reported experiences of HPB surgeons from different training pathways. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(9):785–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kennedy GT, McMillan MT, Sprys MH, et al. The influence of fellowship training on the practice of pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2016;18(12):965–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Health GBDo. Protecting staff; delivering services: implementing the European working time directive for doctors in training. London; 2003. p. 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Rybock JD. Residents’ duty hours and professionalism. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(9):930–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Aryal KR, Pereira J. E learning in surgery. Indian J Surg. 2014;76(6):487–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Smith PJ, Wigmore SJ, Paisley A, et al. Distance learning improves attainment of professional milestones in the early years of surgical training. Ann Surg. 2013;258(5):838–42; discussion 842–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Roy M, Dip F, Rosales A, et al. Smartphone application as an education platform in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery. Surg Innov. 2019;26(5):613–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chapman SJ, Grossman RC, FitzPatrick MEB, et al. Randomized controlled trial of plain English and visual abstracts for disseminating surgical research via social media. Br J Surg. 2019;106:1611–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Søreide K, Mackenzie G, Polom K, et al. Tweeting the meeting: quantitative and qualitative twitter activity during the 38th ESSO conference. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2019;45(2):284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gallo G, Sturiale A, De Simone V, et al. Epistemic networks on twitter: a new way to learn. J Invest Surg. 2019;1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1656787.

  56. Díaz-Faes AA, Bowman TD, Costas R. Towards a second generation of ‘social media metrics’: characterizing twitter communities of attention around science. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216408.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rowan W. Parks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parks, R.W., Guest, R.V. (2021). Education and Training in Pancreatic Surgery. In: Søreide, K., Stättner, S. (eds) Textbook of Pancreatic Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53786-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53786-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53785-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53786-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics