Abstract
In this chapter, I highlight how Ruud Veenhoven influenced my work about subjective well being in Latin America. Or that purpose I propose some coincidences in the way of thinking between Ruud and the Chilean economist Manfred Max-Neef. I also share some anecdotes about his memorable trip to Colombia. I start from his now classical analysis about the four types of quality of life. From then on, I elaborate on how social relationships in particular relations of good quality with family and sharing of positive emotions can be considered as an interesting variable to explain the paradox of happiness in Latin America.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A und Fitoussi, J.P (2010) Mismeasuring Our Lives. The New Press, New York.
- 2.
Erasmus Happiness Research Organization https://www.eur.nl/en/ehero/.
- 3.
International Society for Quality of Life Studies.
- 4.
See Wills (2009).
References
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
Antonucci, T. C., Arjouch, K., & Birditt, K. S. (2014). The Convoy model, explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. Gerontologist, 54, 82–92.
Beytía, P. (2017). Vínculos familiares: una clave explicativa de la felicidad. In C. Reyes & M. Muñoz (Eds.), La familia en tiempos de cambio. Ediciones UC.
Brief, A. P., Butcher, A. H., George, J. M., & Link, K. E. (1993). Integrating bottom-up and top-down theories of subjective well-being: The case of health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(4), 646–653.
Clifton, J. (2019). The state of world happiness. Gallup blog. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/opinion/gallup/247940/state-world-happiness-2019.asp.
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
Gasper, D. (2007). Human rights, human needs, human development, human security. Relationships between four international “human” discourses. Working paper no. 445. International Institute of Social Studies. The Hague, The Netherlands.
Gasper, D. (2009). Capitalism and human flourishing. Working Paper No 469, International Institute of Social Studies, ISS, The Hague.
Helliwel, J., & Putnam, R. (2004). The social context of wellbeing (Philosophical transcriptions). London: The Royal Society.
Max Neef, M. (1986). Desarrollo a escala humana: Conceptos, aplicaciones y reflexiones. Icaria: Editorial.
Max Neef, M. (1991). Human scale conception. Application and further reflections. New York: The Apex Press.
Rojas, M. (2017). Happiness in Latin America has social foundations. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report 2018. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Rojas, M., Wills-Herrera, E., et al. (2011). El reto de construir socialmente el bienestar de la s personas. La medición del progreso y del bienestar: Propuestas desde América Latina. Mexico, DF: Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico, AC.
Sen, A. (1993). Capabilities and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J. P. (2010). Mismeasuring our lives. New York: The New Press.
Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academia.
Veenhoven, R. I (1991). Is happiness relative? Social Indicators Research, 24, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00292648
Veenhoven, R (2000). The four qualities of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010072010360
Veenhoven, R. (2010). World database of happiness: Continuous register of scientific research on subjective enjoyment of life. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Veenhoven, R. (2017). Greater happiness for a greater number: Did the promise of enlightenment come true? Social Indicators Research, 130(1), 9–25.
Wills, E. (2009). Spirituality and subjective well-being. Empirical evidences for the emergence of a new domain in the PWI index. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(1), 49–69.
Wills-Herrera, E., & Schorch, S. (2019). A Possible explanation for the Latin-American paradox on subjective well-being SWB: The importance of close family as compared to other social circles and what it enables: Meeting frequency and sharing positive emotional support. Proceedings Isqols Conference, Granada, Spain.
Wills-Herrera, E., Forero, C., Orozco, L. E., Pardo, O., & Andonova, V. (2011). The relationships between perceptions of insecurity, social capital and subjective well-being. The Journal of Socioeconomics, 40(1), 88–96.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wills-Herrera, E. (2021). Ruut Veenhoven and the Latin-American Paradox in Happiness. In: Michalos, A.C. (eds) The Pope of Happiness. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 82. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53779-1_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53779-1_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53778-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53779-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)