Abstract
This chapter contributes to the growing body of evidence on effective coproduction by assessing the quality and impacts of representation and non-representation related variables in co-design theory and practice. Six principles of engagement are identified that interact to influence outcomes. These include: (1) inclusive representation of affected people and professionals; (2) autonomy and equality of all participants; (3) plurality of viewpoints and engagement methods; (4) quality of process design and facilitation; (5) transmission of citizen engagement outcomes to formal decision makers and (6) citizen participation as a democratic value. All six principles combine to form an evidence-based model for assessing the quality and impact of coproduction processes, supporting the development of public sector capability and enhancing the legitimacy of public sector decisions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boddy, J. & Terrey, N. (2019), Design for a Better Future: A Guide to Designing in Complex Systems. London: Routledge.
Buchanan, R. (2001), Design Research and the New Learning. Design Issues, 17(4), 3–23.
Burke, B. (2014), Gamify: How Gamification Motivates People to Do Extraordinary Things. Brookline: Biliomotion.
Dorst, K. (2011), The Core of ‘Design Thinking’ and Its Application. Design Studies, 32(6), 521–532.
Evans, M. (2012), Home to Work—An Evaluation. Canberra: DEEWR Innovations Fund. Retrieved 16 December 2019 from: http://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/research/publications/recent-reports.
Evans, M. (2013), Improving Services with Families—A Perfect Project in an Imperfect System. Canberra: ACTCSD. Retrieved 16 December 2019 from: http://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/566444/Strenthening-Families-ANZOG-Evaluation.pdf.
Evans, M. & McGregor (2018), Mandate for Change: Towards an Integrated Service Delivery Model. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Industry, Innovation and Science.
Evans, M. & Terrey, N. (2016), Co-design with Citizens and Stakeholders. In: Stoker, G. & Evans, M. (eds.) Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 243–261.
Fabian Society (2010), Hardest to Reach, the Politics of Multiple Needs and Exclusions. Fabian Policy Report, 63, London: Fabian Society.
Gough, D. & Tripney, J. (2016), Systematic Reviews for Policy. In: Stoker, G. & Evans, M. (eds.) Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 43–68.
John, P. (2016), Randomised Controlled Trials. In: Stoker, G. & Evans, M. (eds.) Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 69–82.
John, P., Cotterill, S., Moseley, A., Richardson, L., Smith, G., Stoker, G. & Wales, C. (2011), Nudge, Nudge, Think, Think: Experimenting with Ways to Change Civic Behaviour. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Leadbeater, C. (2004), Personalisation Through Participation: A New Script for Public Services. London: Demos.
Lowndes, V. (2016), Narrative and Storytelling. In: Stoker, G. & Evans, M. (eds.) Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 83–102.
Moore, N. (2019), Co-design and Deliberative Engagement: What Works. Democracy 2025 Report No. 3. Retrieved 23 December 2019 from: https://www.democracy2025.gov.au/documents/Democracy2025-report3.pdf.
Nesta (2019), Our Futures, by the People, for the People. Retrieved 16 December 2019 from: https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/our-futures-people-people/.
Parker, S. & Heapy, J. (2006), The Journey to the Interface: How Public Service Design Can Connect Users to Reform. London: Demos.
Ryan, M. (2016), Qualitative Comparative Analysis for Reviewing Evidence and Making Decisions. In: Stoker, G. & Evans, M. (eds.) Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 83–102.
Self, P. (1975), Econocrats and the Policy Process. London: Macmillan.
Stoker, G., & Evans, M. (2016), Connecting Social Science and Policy. In: Stoker, G. & Evans, M. (eds.) Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 263–270.
Zimmerman, J., Tomasic, A., Garrod, C., Yoo, D., Hiruncharoenvate, C., Aziz, R., Ravi Thiruvengadam, N., Huang, Y. & Steinfeld, A. (2011), Field Trial of Tiramisu: Crowd Sourcing Bus Arrival Times to Spur Co-design. SIGHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1677–1686.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Moore, N., Evans, M. (2021). It’s All in the Practice: Towards Quality Co-design. In: Loeffler, E., Bovaird, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53704-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53705-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)