Abstract
This chapter focuses on the emerging concept of psychology in the sixteenth century; how the term 'psychology' was used and understood when it appeared in different contexts. At that time, it was not related to philosophy, but rather to the two important contemporaneous trends in Europe; humanism and Protestantism. These movements had a popular origin and backing, but were also supported by the aristocracy in various places in Europe at the turn of the sixteenth century. Recently, there have been some groundbreaking studies on how this term emerged at that time, especially by historians such as Paul Mengal (2005), Fernando Vidal (2011) and, not the least, the Croatian historian Kruno Krstić (1964). These researchers' findings underlie the main hypothesis of this study, namely that psychology did not emerge from philosophy. This hypothesis allows for discussing the diversity of perspectives incorporated in psychology over the last five hundred years. Moreover, it diminishes, or even aims to exclude, the notion that psychology developed from only one subject area. Although the main conclusion of this chapter is that psychology did not derive from philosophy or theology, both fields seem to have benefitted from including psychology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“Yuchologia, that is to say, on the perfection of man, his soul, and particularly on the origin of the latter” (Vidal 2011, 447–48). Additionally, the title indicates that the book comments on certain contemporaneous discussions on theology and philosophy.
References
Aristotle. (1907). De Anima, Transl. by R. D. Hicks, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Beck, L. W. (1969). Early German philosophy. Kant and his predecessors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Burchill, C. J. (1984). Girolamo Zanchi: Portrait of a reformed theologian and his work. Sixteenth Century Journal, XV(2), 185–207.
Dilthey, W. (1900). Die Entstehung der Hermeneutik. In Philosophische Abhandlungen. Christoph Sigwart zu seinem 70. Geburtstage, 28. März 1900 gewidmet […], 185–202. Tübingen. Reprint in: W. D.: Gesammelte Schriften, V (Stuttgart, Göttingen 61974) 317–338, Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_icZZAAAAcAAJ
Krstic, K. (1964). Marko Marulic – The author of the term “Psychology”, Acta Instituti Psychologici Universitatis Zagrabiensis, no. 36, pp. 7–13, Retrieved from Classics in the History of Psychology, http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Krstic/marulic.htm
Mengal, P. (2005). La naissance de la psychologie. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Muller, R. A. (2001). Reformation, orthodoxy, “Christian Aristotelianism,” and the ecclectisism of early modern phislosophy. In Dutch review of church history (Vol. 81.3, pp. 306–325). Leiden: Brill.
Petersen, P. (1921/2015). Geschichte der aristotelischen Philosophie im protestantischen Deutschland, Leipzig, Felix Meiner (1921)/Dehli: Facsimile Publisher (2015).
Ridolfi, R. (2017). Girolamo Savonarola, Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Girolamo-Savonarola
Sundberg, O. K. (1980). Pythagoras og de tonende tall, Oslo: Tanum.
Vidal, F. (2011). The sciences of the soul. The early modern origins of psychology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klempe, S.H. (2020). The First Use of the Term “Psychology”. In: Tracing the Emergence of Psychology, 1520–1750. Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53701-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53701-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53700-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53701-2
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)