Skip to main content

Creating the Images

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Efficient Radiology
  • 448 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is about what happens once all the preliminaries (ordering, scheduling, protocoling, checking in, safety checking, and waiting) have been completed. The key concepts of productivity, capacity, and utilization are discussed with respect to equipment and the people who use it. These metrics are essential to understand the necessary capacity to support a clinical practice, and they vary greatly between walk-in services, scheduled outpatient services, and inpatient services. The need for “excess” capacity to accommodate surges in demand and to assure timely response for urgent cases is also discussed. The chapter concludes with a discussion of some of the challenges to staying on time.

Ma’am, this vacuum cleaner will cut your work in half!

Then I would like to buy two!

Mathematical joke

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The tendency for workers to perform differently when they know that they are being observed is known as the Hawthorne effect.

References

  1. Williams B, Chacko R. Increasing radiographer productivity by an incentive point system. Radiol Technol. 1982;53(5):409–17.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Witt M, Miranda R, Johnson C, Love P. Measuring and improving productivity in general radiology. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7:774–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sura A, Ho A. Enforcing quality metrics over equipment utilization rates as means to reduce Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services imaging costs and improve quality of care. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2011;1:31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu M, Pavlicek W, Liu P, Zhang M, Langer S, Wang S, Place V, Miranda R, Wu T. Informatics in radiology: efficiency metrics for imaging device productivity. Radiographics. 2011;31:603–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aloisio J, Winterfeldt C. Rethinking traditional staffing models. Radiol Manage. 2010;32(6):32–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wikipedia. Linear programming. Wikipedia. [Online]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_programming.

  7. Van Huele C, Vanhoucke M. Analysis of the integration of the physician rostering problem and the surgery scheduling problem. J Med Syst. 2014;38(6):43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van der Veen E, Hans E, Veltman B, Berrevoets L, Berden H. A case study of cost-efficient staffing under annualized hours. Health Care Manag Sci. 2015;18(3):279–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leeftink A, Vliegen I, Hans E. Stochastic integer programming for multi-disciplinary outpatient clinic planning. Health Care Manag Sci. 2019;22(1):53–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rhea J, StGermain R. The relationship of patient waiting time to capacity and utilization in emergency room radiology. Radiology. 1979;130(3):637–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang L, Runzheimer K, Bonifer E, Keulers A, Piechowiak E, Mahnken A. Improving efficiency of interventional service by lean six sigma. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(11):1200–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sadigh G, Applegate K, Saindane A. Prevalence of unanticipated events associated with MRI examinations: a benchmark for MRI quality, safety, and patient experience. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(6):765–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Borthakur A, Weinstein S, Schnall M. Comparison of study activity times for “Full” versus “Fast MRI” for breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(8):1046–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boland G, Houghton M, Marchione D, McCormick W. Maximizing outpatient computed tomography productivity using multiple technologists. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008;5(2):119–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Recht M, Macari M, Lawson K, Mulholland T, Chen D, Kim D, Babb J. Impacting key performance indicators in an academic MR imaging department through process improvement. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10:202–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Recht M, Block K, Chandarana H, Friedlane J, Mulholland T, Teahan D, Wiggins R. Optimization of MRI turnaround times through the use of dockable tables and innovative architectural design strategies. Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):855–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weatherburn GC, Bryan S, West M. A comparison of image reject rates when using film, hard copy computed radiography and soft copy images on picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) workstations. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:653–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Peer S, Peer R, Giacomuzzi S, Jaschke W. Comparative reject analysis in conventional film-screen and digital storage phosphor radiography. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2001;94(1–2):69–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fintelmann F, Pulli B, Abedi-Tari F, Trombley M, Shore M, Shepard J, Rosenthal D. Repeat rates in digital chest radiography and strategies for improvement. J Thorac Imaging. 2012;27:148–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Rosenthal .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rosenthal, D., Pianykh, O. (2021). Creating the Images. In: Efficient Radiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53610-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53610-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53609-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53610-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics