Skip to main content

Ordering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Efficient Radiology
  • 449 Accesses

Abstract

The order starts the clock. If the order is for a walk-in service it will probably be followed shortly by the appearance of a patient. If it is for a scheduled service it will be followed by a request for an appointment. The generation of orders is not uniform throughout the day, but follows a pattern that is typical of many activities. This chapter discusses some of the operational challenges that result from the peaks and valleys of this pattern. We also discuss some of the issues related to order “priority”—the immediacy with which the order must be addressed—and aging but unfilled orders. Some of the other topics that we address are who can place and modify orders, and what information the order should contain.

“The orders ordain events, change the face of the world”

Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, “Flight to Arras”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The other being receipt of finalized diagnostic information, which can include formal written reports or any number of means of communication: from formal consultations to curbside consults, emails, and text messages.

  2. 2.

    Unless you have read “The Little Prince” and perceive this chart as “a boa constrictor digesting an elephant.”

  3. 3.

    The daily volume corresponds to the sum of all hourly volumes—or, simply, to the area under the curve.

  4. 4.

    This of course introduces the issue of potentially discrepant interpretations between the clinician and the radiologist—but that is beyond the scope of this chapter.

References

  1. Rhea JT, St Germain RP. The relationship of patient waiting time to capacity and utilization in emergency room radiology. Radiology. 1979;637(41):130–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Scott M, Waldron A. Improved scheduling operations in diagnostic imaging. Radiol Manag. 2013;35(1):30–5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wessman BV, Moriarity AK, Ametlli V, Kastan DJ. Reducing barriers to timely MR imaging scheduling. Radiographics. 2014;34(7):2064–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McWey RP, Hanshew MD, Patrie JT, Boatman DM, Gaskin CM. Impact of a four-point order-priority score on imaging examination performance times. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13(3):286–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gaskin CMP, Hanshew MD, Boatman DM, McWey RP. Impact of a reading priority scoring system on the prioritization of examination interpretations. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(5):1031–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mele C. Pushing that crosswalk button may make you feel better, but …. New York Times; 27 October 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  7. van Sambeek JR, Joustra PE, Das SF, Bakker PJ, Maas M. Reducing MRI access times by tackling the appointment-scheduling strategy. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(12):1075–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mulaik MW. Orders: to do or not to do? that is the question. Radiol Today. 2013;14(8):30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider E, Franz W, Spitznagel R, Bascom DA, Obuchowski NA. Effect of computerized physician order entry on radiologic examination order indication quality. Arch Intern Med. 2011;13:1036–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. White T. The sword in the stone. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons; 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prabhakar A, Harvey H, Misono A, Erwin A, Jones N, Heffernan J, Rosenthal D. Imaging decision support does not drive out-of-network leakage of referred imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2016;13:606–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen MD. Accuracy of information on imaging requisitions: does it matter? J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4(9):617–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Davis D, Mulligan M. Patient-centered care in diagnostic radiology: lessons learned from patient interviews prior to musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging. Qual Manag Health Care. 2015;24(1):38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Buck S. Follow the rules of diagnostic test orders for radiology. In: Healthcare business monthly. 2017. p. 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Skievaski N. Struck by Orca: ICD-10 Illustrated. 2013, 0615955053, 9780615955056.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Rosenthal .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rosenthal, D., Pianykh, O. (2021). Ordering. In: Efficient Radiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53610-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53610-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53609-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53610-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics