Skip to main content

Penalised Quantile Regression Analysis of the Land Price in Japan by Using GIS Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Eurasian Economic Perspectives

Part of the book series: Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics ((EBES,volume 14/1))

  • 340 Accesses

Abstract

Land price analysis remains one of the active research fields where new methods, in order to quantify the effect of economic and noneconomic characteristics, continually push knowledge frontiers up. Nevertheless, so far, most of the research focus on measuring the causal effect to the mean value of land price by ordinary least squares (OLS) method, despite the possibility that covariates might affect the land price differently at each quantile, that is, causal effects might depend on the quantile of the land price distribution. Furthermore, most of the literature highlights the effect of a few accessibilities, building characteristics, and amenities over the land price by using limited survey data even though the development of geographic information systems (GIS) improves accessibility information to various facilities by positioning properties on the map in terms of their geographic coordinates and provides larger dataset. To identify the heterogeneous causal effects on the land price, the chapter applies the Quantile Regression (QR) method to the land prices function, using GIS data in Japan including micro-level characteristics in 2017. As the number of covariates is large, penalized QR method by regularization helps us to obtain more accurate results in variable selection. We find that QR with GIS data is crucial to obtain detailed relationships between micro-level covariates and land price since GIS data explains that non-macroeconomic variables cause the land price heterogeneously at each quantile. For example, the distance from a medical facility causes a negative effect on the land price; furthermore, this effect is magnified for upper quantiles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, J. S., Lu, K. S., & Potts, T. D. (1999). A GIS-based analysis and prediction of land-use change in a coastal tourism destination area. World congress on coastal and marine tourism, pp. 287–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1998). GIS research infrastructure for spatial analysis of real estate markets. Journal of Housing Research, 9(1), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., & Kato, K. (2017). High-dimensional quantile regression. In R. Koenker, V. Chernozhukov, X. He, & L. Peng (Eds.), Handbook of quantile regression (pp. 253–272). Boca Raton, Florida: Chapman and Hall/CRC.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire, P., & Sheppard, S. (1995). On the Price of land and the value of amenities. Economica, 62(246), 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firpo, S., Fortin, N., & Lemieux, T. (2009). Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3), 953–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010). Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software, 33(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gronberg, T. J., & Meyer, J. (1982). Spatial pricing, spatial rents, and spatial welfare. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97(4), 633–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Himmelberg, C. P., Mayer, C. J., & Sinai, T. M. (2005). Assessing high house prices: Bubbles, fundamentals, and misperceptions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamada, K., Hirata, W., & Wago, H. (2007). Determinants of land-price movements in Japan. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, no. 07-E-7, pp. 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanemoto, Y. (1988). Hedonic prices and the benefits of public projects. Econometrica, 56(4), 981–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, A. T. (1977). Computing general equilibrium prices for spatial economies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 59(3), 340–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R., & Machado, J. F. (1999). Goodness of fit and related inference processes for quantile regression. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1296–1310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, W. C., & Wang, X. (2012). Hedonic house prices and spatial quantile regression. Journal of Housing Economics, 21(1), 16–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limsombunchai, V., Gan, C., & Lee, M. (2004). House Price prediction: Hedonic Price model vs. artificial neural network. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 1(3), 193–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi, Y. (1994). Land prices and house prices in Japan. In Y. Noguchi & J. Poterba (Eds.), Housing markets in the U.S. and Japan (pp. 11–28). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyeyemi, G. M., Ogunjobi, E. O., & Folorunsho, A. I. (2015). On performance of shrinkage methods – A Monte Carlo study. International Journal of Statistics and Applications, 5(2), 72–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, S. R. (2015). Quantile regression: Analyzing changes in distributions instead of means. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 335–380). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saita, Y. (2003). Land Price journal of political Economys in the Tokyo metropolitan area: A hedonic analysis of judicial auction prices. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series, no. 03-E-4, pp. 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saiz, A. (2010). The geographic determinants of housing supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1253–1296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimizu, C., & Nishimura, K. G. (2007). Pricing structure in Tokyo metropolitan land markets and its structural changes: Pre-bubble, bubble, and post-bubble periods. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 35(4), 475–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stutz, F. P., & Kartman, A. E. (1982). Housing affordability and spatial Price variations in the United States. Economic Geography, 58(3), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzaki, K., & Ohta, M. (1994). A hedonic analysis of land prices and rents in the bubble: Kanagawa prefecture in Japan for 1986-1988. The Economic Studies Quarterly, 45(1), 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani, R. (1996). Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 58(1), 267–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokuda, M. (2009). Consideration of relation between characteristic and Price of land by hedonic approach: The residential quarter in Shiga prefecture as a case study. Shiga University Working Paper Series, 120, 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worku, G. B. (2017). House price drivers in Dubai: Nonlinearity and heterogeneity. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 10(3), 384–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y., & Liu, Y. (2009). Variable selection in quantile regression. Statistica Sinica, 19, 801–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, T. (2008). Heterogeneity in housing attribute prices. International Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 1(2), 166–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yi, C., & Huang, J. (2017). Semismooth Newton coordinate descent algorithm for elastic-net penalized Huber loss regression and quantile regression. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 26(3), 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005). Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 67(2), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Katafuchi, Y., Delgado Narro, A.R. (2020). Penalised Quantile Regression Analysis of the Land Price in Japan by Using GIS Data. In: Bilgin, M.H., Danis, H., Demir, E. (eds) Eurasian Economic Perspectives. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 14/1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53536-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics