Influence of Relationship Capability on Project Performance of Post-merger IS Integration

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 389)


Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) highly rely on the information technology systems integration (ISI) of two companies to realize the operation and resource synergy. Given the vast cost of M&A and the high failure rate of the post-merger ISI, various strategies, enforcement mechanisms, and potential determinants for the ISI success have been proposed. The capability of IS managers is one of the recognized factors that are critical to ISI success. This study extends the theory of relationship quality to explain how the relationship ability of IS personnel influences the outcomes of the ISI in the M&A context. The empirical survey of IS personnel shows that relationship ability improves not only relationship quality but also teamwork quality of the ISI. The findings shed light on the different functions of relationship capability in the managerial design and imply the significance of relational building ability as an important skill of IS personnel for achieving post-merger ISI success.


Mergers and acquisitions IS integration Teamwork quality Relationship quality Management performance 



This work was supported by the MOST (Grant No. 108-2410-H-155 -038).


  1. 1.
    Hedman, J., Sarker, S.: Information system integration in mergers and acquisitions: research ahead. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24(2), 117–120 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Raice, C.: Broken deals rein in a strong M&A market. Wall Street J. (2015). Accessed 29 Nov 2019
  3. 3.
    Mergers & Acquisitions review- full year 2015. Accessed 28 Nov 2019
  4. 4.
    Tanriverdi, H., Uysal, V.B.: When IT capabilities are not scale-free in merger and acquisition integrations: how do capital markets react to IT capability asymmetries between acquirer and target? Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24(2), 145–158 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weber, Y.: The role of organizational identity in post-merger integration. In: Thrassou, A., Vrontis, D., Weber, Y., Shams, S.M.R., Tsoukatos, E. (eds.) The Synergy of Business Theory and Practice. PSCBRIAEAB, pp. 91–107. Springer, Cham (2019). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Haleblian, J., Devers, C.E., McNamara, G., Carpenter, M.A., Davison, R.B.: Taking stock of what we know about mergers and acquisitions: a review and research agenda. J. Manag. 35(3), 469–502 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanriverdi, H., Uysal, V.B.: Cross-business information technology integration and acquirer value creation in corporate mergers and acquisitions. Inf. Syst. Res. 22(4), 703–720 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mouawad, J.: For united, big problems at biggest airline. New York Times (2012). Accessed 29 Nov 2019
  9. 9.
    Yetton, P., Henningsson, S., Bjorn-Andersen, N.: Ready to acquire’: IT resources for a growth-by-acquisition strategy. MIS Q. Exec. 12(1), 19–35 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stylianou, A.C., Jeffries, C.J., Robbins, S.S.: Corporate mergers and the problems of IS integration. Inf. Manag. 31(4), 203–213 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chang, Y.B., Cho, W.: The risk implications of mergers and acquisitions with information technology firms. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 34(1), 232–267 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Henningsson, S., Kettinger, W.J.: Understanding information systems integration deficiencies in mergers and acquisitions: a configurational perspective. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 33(4), 942–977 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lohrke, F.T., Frownfelter-Lohrke, C., Ketchen Jr., D.J.: The role of information technology systems in the performance of mergers and acquisitions. Bus. Horiz. 59(1), 7–12 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van Knippenberg, D., Van Knippenberg, B., Monden, L., de Lima, F.: Organizational identification after a merger: a social identity perspective. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 41(2), 233–252 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wijnhoven, F., Spil, T., Stegwee, R., Fa, R.T.A.: Post-merger IT integration strategies: an IT alignment perspective. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 15(1), 5–28 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baker, E.W., Niederman, F.: Integrating the IS functions after mergers and acquisitions: analyzing business-IT alignment. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 23(2), 112–127 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Robbins, S.S., Stylianou, A.C.: Post-merger systems integration: the impact on IS capabilities. Inf. Manag. 36(4), 205–212 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Swar, B., Moon, J., Oh, J., Rhee, C.: Determinants of relationship quality for IS/IT outsourcing success in public sector. Inf. Syst. Front. 14(2), 457–475 (2012). Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jiang, J.J., Klein, G., Chen, H.-G.: The effects of user partnering and user non-support on project performance. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7(1), 6 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liu, J.Y.-C., Chiu, G.C.-T.: Influence of project partnering on stakeholder role ambiguity and project manager risk perception in information system projects. Proj. Manag. J. 47(6), 94–110 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee, J.N., Kim, Y.G.: Effect of partnership quality on IS outsourcing success: conceptual framework and empirical validation. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 29–61 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alaranta, M., Henningsson, S.: An approach to analyzing and planning post-merger IS integration: insights from two field studies. Inf. Syst. Front. 10(3), 307 (2008). Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sutterfield, J.S., Friday-Stroud, S.S., Shivers-Blackwell, S.L.: A case study of project and stakeholder management failures: lessons learned. Proj. Manag. J. 37(5), 26–35 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoegl, M., Weinkauf, K., Gemuenden, H.G.: Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: a longitudinal study. Organ. Sci. 15(1), 38–55 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lindsjørn, Y., Sjøberg, D.I., Dingsøyr, T., Bergersen, G.R., Dybå, T.: Teamwork quality and project success in software development: a survey of agile development teams. J. Syst. Softw. 122, 274–286 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hackman, J.R.: The design of work teams. In: Lorsch, J.W. (Ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behaviour. The Design of Work Teams, pp. 315–342. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1987)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    McGrath, J.E.: Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1964)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Faraj, S., Sproull, L.: Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manag. Sci. 46(12), 1554–1568 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hsu, J.S.-C., Shih, S.-P., Chiang, J.C., Liu, J.Y.-C.: The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams’ coordination, communication, and performance. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30(3), 329–340 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stevens, M.J., Campion, M.A.: Staffing work teams: development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. J. Manag. 25(2), 207–228 (1999)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, E.T., Chen, H.H., Jiang, J.J., Klein, G.: Interaction quality between IS professionals and users: impacting conflict and project performance. J. Inf. Sci. 31(4), 273–282 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kroonenberg, P.M.: Latent variable path modeling with partial least squares. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 85(411), 909–911 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementYuan Ze UniversityTaoyuan CityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations