Skip to main content

Evaluating Interactions with a Cognitively Biased Robot in a Creative Collaborative Task

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation (ArtsIT 2019, DLI 2019)

Abstract

Within the field of human-robot interaction (HRI), robots designed for social interactions are not only evaluated in terms of efficiency and accuracy. Factors related to the “personality” or “cognitive” ability of the robot such as perceived likability and intelligence are important considerations because they must engage with their human counterparts in deeper, more authentic and sometimes creative ways. Interactive art allows for the exploration of such interactions, however, the study of robots in interactive art remains relatively less commonplace and evaluations of these robots in creative contexts are similarly lacking. In this paper, we present an interactive robot inspired by Norman White’s The Helpless Robot (1987), which has been endowed with a cognitive bias known as the Dunning-Kruger effect and the ability to collaborate with participants in a creative drawing task. We evaluate the participants’ interactions with both biased and unbiased versions of this robot using the Godspeed Questionnaire Series (GQS), which has been modified to include measures of creativity, and relate these findings to analyses of their collaborative drawings. Our results indicate a significant difference between the versions of the robot for several measures in the GQS, with the unbiased version rated more positively than the biased robot in all cases. Analysis of the drawings suggests that participants interacting with the biased robot were less inclined to collaborate in a cooperative manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arduino Documentation. https://www.arduino.cc/en/main/documentation. Accessed 13 July 2019

  2. Bartneck, C., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Is the uncanny valley an uncanny cliff? In: RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Jeju, Korea, pp. 368–373 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E.: Measuring the anthropomorhism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 71–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biswas, M., Murray, J.: Towards an imperfect robot for long-term companionship: case studies using cognitive biases. In: 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, pp. 5978–5983. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Biswas, M., Murray, J.: The effects of cognitive biases and imperfectness in long-term robot-human interactions: case studies using five cognitive biases on three robots. Cogn. Syst. Res. 43, 266–290 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang, S., Sung, H.: The effectiveness of seal-like robot therapy on mood and social interactions of older adults: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 10, 68–75 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Demers, L.P.: The Blind Robot. http://www.robotsandavatars.net/exhibition/jurys_selection/commissions/the-blind-robot/. Accessed 9 July 2019

  8. Glynn, R.: Motive Colloquies. http://www.ruairiglynn.co.uk/portfolio/motive-colloquies-2011/. Accessed 9 July 2019

  9. Ham, J., Midden, C.J.H.: A persuasive robot to stimulate energy conservation: the influence of positive and negative social feedback and task similarity on energy-consumption behavior. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 6(2), 163–171 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ham, J., Cuijpers, R.H., Cabibihan, J.: Combining robotic persuasive strategies: the persuasive power of a storytelling robot that uses gazing and gestures. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(4), 479–487 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hayes, B., Ullman, D., Alexander, E., Bank, C., Scassellati, B.: People help robots who help others, not robots who help themselves. In: The 23rd IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, pp. 255–260. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hinwood, D., Ireland, J., Jochum, E.A., Herath, D.: A proposed wizard of OZ architecture for a human-robot collaborative drawing task. In: Ge, S.S., et al. (eds.) ICSR 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11357, pp. 35–44. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05204-1_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Konok, V., Korcsok, B., Miklósi, Á., Gácsi, M.: Should we love robots? - the most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots. Comput. Hum. Behav. 80, 132–142 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leite, I., Pereira, A., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Prada, R., Paiva, A.: The influence of empathy in human-robot relations. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 71, 250–260 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milthers, A.D.B., Bjerre Hammer, A., Jung Johansen, J., Jensen, L.G., Jochum, E.A., Löchtefeld, M.: The helpless soft robot - stimulating human collaboration through robotic movement. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2019, pp. LBW2421:1–LBW2421:6. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Obo, T., Kasuya, C., Sun, S., Kubota, N.: Human-robot interaction based on cognitive bias to increase motivation for daily exercise. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), Banff, pp. 2945–2950. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Processing Language Reference (API). https://processing.org/reference/. Accessed 13 July 2019

  18. Vorn, B.: DSM-VI. https://billvorn.concordia.ca/robography/DSM.html. Accessed 9 July 2019

  19. Vorn, B.: Hysterical machine. http://billvorn.concordia.ca/robography/Hysterical.html. Accessed 9 July 2019

  20. Weiss, A., Bartneck, C.: Meta analysis of the usage of the Godspeed Questionnaire Series. In: 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), Kobe, Japan, pp. 381–388. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. White, N.: The Helpless Robot. http://dada.compart-bremen.de/item/artwork/609. Accessed 9 July 2019

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Bemman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Johansen, J.J., Jensen, L.G., Bemman, B. (2020). Evaluating Interactions with a Cognitively Biased Robot in a Creative Collaborative Task. In: Brooks, A., Brooks, E. (eds) Interactivity, Game Creation, Design, Learning, and Innovation. ArtsIT DLI 2019 2019. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 328. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53294-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53294-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53293-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53294-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics