Skip to main content

Division of the Molding and Core Sands: Criteria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mold and Core Sands in Metalcasting: Chemistry and Ecology
  • 422 Accesses

Abstract

Generally cores are produced by the same techniques as molds. Small- and medium-size cores are often blown or shot into the core box. Molding sands can differ from each other according to their composition, binding methods, and consistency. A few systems, taking into account dividing of sands in dependence of the assumed criterion, were developed. Molding sands can be divided in dependence of their destination, the function which they have in molds, or a wear degree. Assuming the chemical character of the binding material as the criterion, there are inorganic or organic binders. The temperature, at which a hardening process of binders occurs, can be also the dividing criterion: room temperature, increased temperature, or high temperature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Work time is the property determining time – calculated from the moment of coming into contact of all components necessary for sand binding. During this time, a sand is suitable for forming (making molds or cores).

  2. 2.

    Strip time – the period after which a core can be removed from a core-box or a pattern from a mold without causing damages.

References

  1. Campbell J (2011) Complete casting handbook, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. LaFay VS, Crandell G, Schifo J (2007) Foundry of the future: recommendations to improve environmental and energy concerns in sand foundries. AFS Trans 115:997–989

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lewandowski JL (1997) Materials for foundry molds. AKAPIT, Cracow (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huttenes-Albertus company, GmbH and HA Internatinal (2014) www.ha-international.com. Accessed 15 Dec 2016

  5. Trinowski DM (2016) Comparing molding and core making trends in the U.S. and EU casting industries. Hüttenes-Albertus Chem. Werke GmbH

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giese SR, Roorda SC, Patersson MA (2009) Thermal analysis of phenolic urethane binder and correlated properties. AFS Trans 102:355–366

    Google Scholar 

  7. Thiel J (2011) Thermal expansion of chemically bonded silica sand. AFS Trans 116:369–378

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khandelwal H, Ravi B (2015) Effect of binder composition on the shrinkage of chemically bonded sand cores. J Mater Manuf Process 30:1465–1470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. European Commission (2005) Integrated pollution prevention and control reference document on best available techniques in the Smitheries and Foundries Industry

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jelinek P (2004) Pojivove soustavy slevarenskych formovacich Smeli. Chemie slevarenskych pojiv, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  11. Polzin H (2014) Inorganic binders for mould and core production in the foundry. Schiele and Schon Gmbh, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown J (2000) Foseco ferrous foundryman’s handbook, 11th edn. Foseco International, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  13. European Commission (2015) Best Available Techniques (BAT) reference document for the propuction of pulp, paper and board. Industrial Emission Directive 2010/75/EU (Intergated Pollution Prevention and Control). https://doi.org/10.2791/370629

  14. Goovaerts L, Veys Y, Meulcpas P, Vercaemst P, Dijkmans R (2001) Beste beschikbare technicen voor de gieterijen. Vito

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pilato L (2010) Phenolic resins: a century of progress. Springer, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. TWG (2003) Comments to the second draft on Integrated pollution prevention and control reference document on Best Available Techniques in the Smitheries and Foundries Industry

    Google Scholar 

  17. Avella M, Bondioli F, Cannillo V, Errico ME, Ferrari AM, Focher B et al (2004) Preparation, characterization and comptatioal study of poly (ɛ-caprolactone) based nanocomposites. Mater Sci Technol 20:15–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhou X, Yang J, Qu G (2004) Adhesive bonding and self-curing characteristics of α- starch based composite binder for green sand mold/core. J Mater Sci Technol 20:617–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu W, He H, Cheng H, Gan B, Li X (2009) Preparation and experiments for a novel kind of foundry core binder made from modified potato starch. Mater Des 30:310–313

    Google Scholar 

  20. Makino H, Kato Y, Zenpo T, Asano N (2005) Molding simulation and experiment of new coremaking system with polysaccharide-based binder. AFS Trans:333–340

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kato Y, Zenpo T, Asano N (2005) New core binder system for aluminum casting based on polysaccharide. AFS Trans 113:327–332

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou X, Yang J, Qu G (2007) Study on syntheses and properties of modified starch binder foundry. J Mater Process Technol 183:407–411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parker D, Herreid R (2005) Staying competitive and environmentally compliant. Foundry Manag Technol 133:27–28

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lessiter MJ, Kotzin EL (2002) Timeline of casting technology. Eng Cast Solutions 4:76–80

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gardziella A, Pilato LA, Knop A (2000) Phenolic resins. Chemistry, applications, standarizations, safety and ecology. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  26. Archibald J, Kroker J (2013) High efficiency cold box processes – technology focused on business goals. Int J Met 7(2):51–59

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ashland Foundry & Machine Works (2017) http://www.ashlandfoundrymachineworks.com/. Accessed 10 Dec 2017

  28. Pezarski F, Smoluchowska E, Izdebska-Szanda I (2008) Application of geopolymer binder in manufacturing of casting from ferrous alloys. Trans Foundry Res Inst 2:19–34

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pezarski F, Izdebska-Szanda I, Smoluchowska E, Świder R, Pysz A (2011) Application of molding sands with geopolymer binder in the manufacture of castings from aluminium alloys. Trans Foundry Res Inst 2:23–34

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yanchun L (2015) Status and development trend of Chinese molding materials. WFO Int Forum Mold Mater Cast Technol:110–117

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ambridge PF, Biggins PD (1985) Environmental problems arising from the use of chemicals in molding materials. BCIRA J 33:296–305

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scott WD, Bates LE, James RH (1977) Chemical emissions from foundry molds. AFS Trans 85:203–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holtzer, M., Kmita, A. (2020). Division of the Molding and Core Sands: Criteria. In: Mold and Core Sands in Metalcasting: Chemistry and Ecology . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53210-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics