Skip to main content

Aggregate Molding Materials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mold and Core Sands in Metalcasting: Chemistry and Ecology

Abstract

The matrix is the basic component of molding and core sands. Natural sands (quartz, zirconium, chromite, olivine) as well as synthetic sands are used as matrices. The most often a quartz sand is used; however it has several drawbacks: low-melting temperature, high linear and volumetric dilatability as well as phase transformations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Silica behavior during heating (melting temperature, volume dilatability, or temperature of other transformations) strongly depends on its origin source, chemical composition, grain sizes, introduced additions, etc. Thus, grain size has a minimal influence on silica sand expansion, but not all sands have the same increasing degree. Sands containing finer grains are less expanding than sands containing large grains. The chemical composition has the highest influence on the silica sand expansion. The expansion of silica sand with binder addition is different than the expansion of sand alone. This is explained by the fact that several binders during heating undergo decomposition or burning. In addition, at the beginning of heating binders are undergoing further polymerization. Therefore, the expansion of molding sand is usually lower than of individual silica grains [26].

References

  1. Lewandowski JL (1997) Materials for foundry molds. AKAPIT, Cracow (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  2. (2018) OSHA’s respirable crystalline silica standard for general industry and maritime

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goovaerts L, Veys Y, Meulcpas P, Vercaemst P, Dijkmans R (2001) Beste beschikbare technicen voor de gieterijen, Vito

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dawson M. Silica sand: foundry requirements and classification. Foundry cast syst & casting methods Cast Met Serv LDT, https://www.academia.edu/19130829/SILICA_SAND_FOUNDRY_REQUIREMENS_AND_CLASSIFICATION, Access 09.11.9019

  5. Brown J (2000) Foseco ferrous foundryman’s handbook, 11th edn. Elsevier/Foseco International, Woburn

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ringdalen E (2005) Changes in quartz during heating and the possible effect on Si production. JOM 67:484–492

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holmquist SB (1960) Conversion of quartz to tridymite. J Am Ceram Soc 44:82–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Maciejewska A, Krol M (2014) Respirable crystalline silica : quartz and cristobalite. Princ Methods Assess Work Environ 3:103–119. (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Webster PD (1980) Fundamentals of foundry technology. Portcullis Press, Redhill, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes D (2016) Reclaimed sand in foundries. Matarials Foseco Aust

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mod Cast 2007;March:26

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campbell J (2011) Complete casting handbook, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. LaFay VS, Neltner SL, Ziegler M (2010) Bonding properties in sand. AFS Trans:118:115–130

    Google Scholar 

  14. LaFay VS, Neltner SL, Ziegler M, Thiel J (2012) Replacement of olivine with silica sand in non-ferrous foundries. AFS Trans: 120:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  15. Scott WD, Thomas EM, Strohmayer LL (2003) Quality issues in the selection of chromite sand for steel foundry use. AFS Trans 111:517–527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Drużewski MA, Muravo YN (2013) Burning-on on large sand steel casting faced with chromite. LitProizy 8:11–14

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tihon G, Sicot S (2010) Search for substitute sands to replace chromite and zircon. Fonderie Mag 4:19–33

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frulli D (2013) Use of Kerphalite KF as a foundry sand in steel and iron casting. Proceed. Mat. Int. Conf. Foundry Mold. Mater. Sand Team. pp 175–179

    Google Scholar 

  19. Narasimha MI, Babu RJ (2017) Ferro chrome slag: alternative mold material in ferrous and non-ferrous foundries. Int J Met 11:598–628

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schafer JM, Kramer J, Schafer J (2009) Der neue formgrundstoff CERATEC als alternative zu zirkon – und chromitsand. Giesserei-Praxis 12:404–406

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wakita K, Matsubara M (2015) Characteristics and application of the round ceramic base sand CERABEADS. Slevarenstvi 7–8:24–28

    Google Scholar 

  22. ITOCHU CERATECH Corporation (2017) http://www.itc-cera.co.jp/english. Access 20 Dec 2017

  23. Gentry EG, Lear C (1961) Calcined fluid coke as new molding medium-preliminary evaluation. AFS Trans 69:320–327

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gentry EG (1966) Thermal stability of carbon sand and other non-silica molding materials. AFS Trans 74:142–149

    Google Scholar 

  25. Budihardjo MA, Chegenizadeh A, Nikraz H (2015) Investigation of the strength of carbon-sand mixture. 7th World Congr. Part. Technol. pp 634–639

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thiel J, Ziegler M, Dziekonski P, Joyce S (2007) Investigation into the technical limitations of silica sand due to thermal expansion. AFS Trans 115:383–400

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendix 4.1

Appendix 4.1

Fast recalculating matrix grain sizes from AFS system into μm, according to J. Campbell [12]:

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{c}\mathrm{No}. AFS\ \mathrm{x}\ \mathrm{micrometry}\ \left(\upmu \mathrm{m}\right)\kern0.5em =15\ 000\\ {} AFS\ 50=300\ \mu m\\ {} AFS\ 75=200\ \upmu \mathrm{m}\\ {} AFS\ 100=150\ \upmu \mathrm{m}\\ {} AFS\ 150=100\ \upmu \mathrm{m}\\ {} AFS\ 200=75\ \upmu \mathrm{m}\end{array}} $$

Approximate change according to AFS grain fitness number into an average grain size

AFS No.

35

40

45

50

55

60

65

70

80

90

Average grain sands (μm)

390

340

300

280

240

220

210

195

170

150

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Holtzer, M., Kmita, A. (2020). Aggregate Molding Materials. In: Mold and Core Sands in Metalcasting: Chemistry and Ecology . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53210-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics