Skip to main content

Human Factors Principles of Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Factors in Surgery

Abstract

This chapter serves as the introduction to the Human Factors section of this book and provides a broad overview of human factors as it relates to surgery. The authors define the science of human factors; describe a brief history of its use; and discuss various system factors (e.g., humans, tools/technology, tasks, environments, and organizations) and their role in the efficiency, safety, and well-being of surgeons and surgical patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. International Ergonomics Association. What is ergonomics. IEA; 2020. Available from: https://www.iea.cc/whats/index.html.

  3. Marmaras N, Poulakakis G, Papakostopoulos V. Ergonomic design in ancient Greece. Appl Ergon. 1999;30(4):361–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meister D. The history of human factors and ergonomics. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2018

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baumgar A, Neuhauser D. Frank and Lillian Gilbreth: scientific management in the operating room. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009;18(5):413–5.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Office of Statistical Control. Army Air Forces statistical digest (World War II). 1945:121.

    Google Scholar 

  7. de Leval MR, Carthey J, Wright DJ, Farewell VT, Reason JT. Human factors and cardiac surgery: A multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119(4):661–72.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carayon P, Hundt AS, Karsh BT, Gurses AP, Alvarado CJ, Smith M, et al. Work system design for patient safety: the SEIPS model. BMJ Qual Saf. 2006;15(suppl 1):i50–i8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Holden RJ, Carayon P, Gurses AP, Hoonakker P, Hundt AS, Ozok AA, et al. SEIPS 2.0: a human factors framework for studying and improving the work of healthcare professionals and patients. Ergonomics. 2013;56(11):1669–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson O, Davis R, Hanna GB, Vincent CA. Surgical adverse events: a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2013;206(2):253–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Maykel JA. Leadership in surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013;26(4):254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wadhera RK, Parker SH, Burkhart HM, Greason KL, Neal JR, Levenick KM, et al. Is the “sterile cockpit” concept applicable to cardiovascular surgery critical intervals or critical events? The impact of protocol-driven communication during cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(2):312–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rotenstein LS, Torre M, Ramos MA, Rosales RC, Guille C, Sen S, et al. Prevalence of burnout among physicians: a systematic Review Prevalence of burnout among PhysiciansPrevalence of burnout among physicians. JAMA. 2018;320(11):1131–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carswell CM, Clarke D, Seales WB. Assessing mental workload during laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov. 2005;12(1):80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yurko YY, Scerbo MW, Prabhu AS, Acker CE, Stefanidis D. Higher mental workload is associated with poorer laparoscopic performance as measured by the NASA-TLX tool. Simul Healthc. 2010;5(5):267–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shanafelt TD, Dyrbye LN, West CP. Addressing physician burnout: the way forward. JAMA. 2017;317(9):901–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(11):753–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park AE, Zahiri HR, Hallbeck MS, Augenstein V, Sutton E, Yu D, et al. Intraoperative “micro breaks” with targeted stretching enhance surgeon physical function and mental focus: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg. 2017;265(2):340–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat A-HS, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wiegmann DA, Eggman AA, ElBardissi AW, Parker SH, Sundt TM III. Improving cardiac surgical care: a work systems approach. Appl Ergon. 2010;41(5):701–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Brogmus G, Leone W, Butler L, Hernandez E. Best practices in OR suite layout and equipment choices to reduce slips, trips, and falls. AORN J. 2012;86(3):384–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lynch RJ, Englesbe MJ, Sturm L, Bitar A, Budhiraj K, Kolla S, et al. Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control. Am J Med Qual. 2008;24(1):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM. Managing the unexpected: sustained performance in a complex world. Hoboken: Wiley; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. King HB, Battles J, Baker DP, Alonso A, Salas E, Webster J, Toomey L, Salisbury M. TeamSTEPPS™: Team strategies and tools to enhance performance and patient safety. In: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al., editors. Advances in patient safety: new directions and alternative approaches, vol. 3. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cooper M, Makary MA. A comprehensive unit-based safety program (CUSP) in surgery: improving quality through transparency. Surg Clin. 2012;92(1):51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Frankel A, Grillo SP, Pittman M, et al. Revealing and resolving patient safety defects: the impact of leadership WalkRounds on frontline caregiver assessments of patient safety. Health Serv Res. 2008;43:2050–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stanton NA, Salmon PM, Rafferty LA, Walker GH, Baber C, Jenkins DP. Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design. 2nd ed. London: CRC Press; 2013. 656 p.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Carayon P, Wooldridge A, Hose B-Z, Salwei M, Benneyan J. Challenges and opportunities for improving patient safety through human factors and systems engineering. Health Aff. 2018;37(11):1862–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Catchpole K, Neyens DM, Abernathy J, Allison D, Joseph A, Reeves ST. Framework for direct observation of performance and safety in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(12):1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tara N. Cohen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cohen, T.N., Ley, E.J., Gewertz, B.L. (2020). Human Factors Principles of Surgery. In: Cohen, T.N., Ley, E.J., Gewertz, B.L. (eds) Human Factors in Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53127-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53127-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53126-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53127-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics