Skip to main content

Human Factors Research in Orthopaedic Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Factors in Surgery
  • 476 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides a broad overview of human factors research in orthopaedic surgery. There has been little human factors research specific to orthopaedic surgery. Most related research evaluates operating room (OR) efficiency and safety—orthopaedic procedures are generally included in broader research evaluating OR efficiency and safety. Nevertheless, it is worth reviewing this evidence as it relates to orthopaedics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Healey T, El-Othmani M, Healey J, Peterson T, Saleh K. Improving operating room efficiency, part 1: general managerial and preoperative strategies. JBJS Rev. 2015;3(10):30.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Terry CS. Wrong-site surgery-a preventable complication. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;Number 433:26–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wong D, Herndon J, Canale T. An AOA critical issue. Medical errors in orthopaedics: practical pointers for prevention. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(11):2097–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Santiesteban L, Hutzler L, Bosco JA, Robb W. Wrong-site surgery in orthopaedics: prevalence, risk factors, and strategies for prevention. JBJS Rev. 2016;4(1):01874474-201601000-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark JR, Johnston J, Finley ED. Getting surgery right. Ann Surg. 2007;246(3):395–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Haugen AS, Sevdalis N, Softeland E. Impact of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on patient safety. Anesthesiology. 2019;131(2):420–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Herbosa T, Joseph S, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, Merry AF, Moorthy K, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Gawande AA. Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Haugen AS, Waehle HV, Almeland SK, Harthug S, Sevdalis N, Eide GE, Nortvedt MW, Smith I, Softeland E. Causal analysis of World Health Organization’s surgical checklist implementation quality and impact on care processes and patient outcomes: secondary analysis from a large stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trail in Norway. Ann Surg. 2019;269(2):283–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nicolay CR, Purkayastha S, Greenhalgh A, Benn J, Chaturvedi S, Phillips N, Darzi A. Systematic review of the application of quality improvement methodologies from the manufacturing industry to surgical healthcare. Br J Surg. 2012;99(3):324–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Attarian DE, Wahl JE, Wellman SS, Bolognesi MP. Developing a high-efficiency operating room for total joint arthroplasty in an academic setting. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(6):1832–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cima RR, Brown MJ, Hebl JR, Moore R, Rogers JC, Kollengode A, Amstutz GJ, Wesibrod CA, Narr BJ, Deschamps C. Surgical process improvement tream, Mayo Clinic, Rochester. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213(1):83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. “If I had only one hour to save the world, I would spend fifty-five minutes defining the problem, and only five minutes finding the solution.” Albert Einstein.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith CD, Spackman T, Brommer K, Stewart MW, Vizzini M, Frye J, Rupp WC. Re-engineering the operating room using the variability methodology to improve health care value. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;216(4):559–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pugely AJ, Gao Y, Martin CT, Callagh JJ, Weinstein SL, March JL. The effect of resident participation on short-term outcomes after orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(7):2290–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frank RM, Erickson B, Frank JM, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr, Cole BJ, Romeo AA, Provencher MT, Verma NN. Utility of modern arthroscopic stimulator training models. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(1):121–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Howells NR, Gill HS, Carr AJ, Price AJ, Rees JL. Transferring simulated arthroscopic skills to the operating theatre: a randomized blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90(4):494–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Vrahas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vrahas, M. (2020). Human Factors Research in Orthopaedic Surgery. In: Cohen, T.N., Ley, E.J., Gewertz, B.L. (eds) Human Factors in Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53127-0_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53127-0_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53126-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53127-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics