Abstract
Geographic information systems (GIS) receive data from many sources that are different in technology, geographic coverage, date of capture, and accuracy – to mention few categories. The vast majority of the today's topographical and GIS-data are captured from mobile and possibly autonomous platforms that operate from the air, on the ground (also indoors) or on the water and that are equipped with optical sensors. Although the palette of optical sensors is rather large the most useful for mapping purposes falls into two categories. First are the passive sensors such as digital cameras in frame or line configuration. The main technological concepts of these sensors are introduced in Optical Sensors together with Lidar that serves the acquisition of detailed terrain structure in natural areas. The optical acquisition is supported by trajectory determination through the combined use of integrated navigation technology, which main concepts are outlined in Navigation Sensors. The geometrical principals of 3-D restitution of the scene are described first in Photogrammetry for the case of frame imagery only, later in Sensor Fusion for active sensors and integrated approaches. An overview of Mapping Products concludes this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Wolf, P.: Elements of Photogrammetry. McGraw-Hill, New York (1974)
Kraus, K.: Photogrammetry – Geometry from Images and Laser Scans. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Boston (2007)
Dorstel, C., Jacobsen, K., Stallmann, D.: DMC – Photogrammetric accuracy – Calibration aspects and generation of synthetic DMC images. In: Proc. Opt. 3-D Meas. Tech. Zurich, vol. VI, pp. 74–82. (2003)
Ladstadter, R., Tschemmernegg, H., Gruber, M.: Calibrating the ultracam aerial camera systems, an update. In: Proc. Int. Calibration Orientat. Workshop, EuroCOW, p. 8. (2010)
Gonzalez, R., Woods, R.: Digital Image Processing. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992)
Ehlers, M., Klonus, S., Astrand, P., Rosso, P.: Multi-sensor image fusion for pansharpening in remote sensing. Int. J. Image Data Fusion 1, 25–45 (2010)
Petri, G.: Deja vu – The configurations of the new airborne digital imagers are all rooted in the distant past! GeoInformatics 3(5), 48–51 (2000)
Petri, G., Walker, S.: Airborne digital imaging technology: A new overview. Photogramm. Rec. 22, 203–225 (2007)
Wehr, A., Lohr, U.: Airborne laser scanning an introduction and overview. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 54(2/3), 68–82 (1999)
Hug, C.: The scanning laser altitude and reflectance sensor – An instrument for efficient 3D terrain survey. In: The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 30, pp. 100–107. (1994)
Lohr, U., Beraldin, A., Blais, F.: Laser scanning technology. In: Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Whittles Publishing, Dunbeath (2010)
Schaer, P.: In-flight Quality Assessment and Data Processing for Airborne Laser Scanning. PhD thesis. The Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne (2009)
Carabajal, C., Harding, D., Luthcke, S.B., Fong, W., Rowton, S., Frawley, J.: Processing of shuttle laser altimeter range and return pulse energy data in support of SLA-02. In: The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 32-A4, pp. 269–277. (1999)
Spikes, V., Csatho, B., Whillans, I.: Airborne laser profiling of Antartic ice stream for change detection. In: The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 32-3-W14, p. 7. (1999)
Geiger, A., Kahle, H.G., Limpach, P.: Airborne Laser Profiling. ETH Research Database 6120. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich (2009)
Morin, K.: Calibration of Airborne Laser Scanners. M.Sc.. Univ. Calgary, Calgary (2002). UCGE Report No. 20179
Glennie, C., Lichti, D.: Static calibration and analysis of the velodyne HDL-64E S2 for high accuracy mobile scanning. Remote Sens. 2, 1610–1624 (2010)
Glennie, C., Kusari, A., Facchin, A.: Calibration and stability analysis of the VLP-16 laser scanner. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XL-3/W4, pp. 55–60. (2016) https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-3-W4-55-2016
Betz, J.: Engineering Satellite-Based Navigation and Timing. Wiley, IEEE Press, Hoboken, New Jersey (2016)
Satirapod, C., Homniam, P.: GPS precise point positioning software for ground control point establishment in remote sensing applications. J. Surv. Eng. 132(1), 11–14 (2006)
Titterton, D., Weston, J.: Strapdown Inertial Navigation Technology (1997). Part of IEE radar, sonar, navigation and avionics series, Stevenage, U.K., all the details in strapdown inertial navigation, attention: some mistakes in equastions
Jekeli, C.: Inertial Navigation Systems with Geodetic Applications. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2001)
Andersson, R., Bilger, H., Stedman, G.: Sagnac effect: A century of Earth-rotated interferometers. Am. J. Phys. 62, 975–985 (1994)
Khaghani, M., Skaloud, J.: Application of vehicle dynamic modeling in UAVs for precise determination of exterior orientation. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XLI-B3, pp. 827–831. (2016) https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XLI-B3-827-2016
Khaghani, M., Skaloud, J.: Assesment of VDM-based autonomous navigation of a UAV under operational conditions. Robot. Auton. Syst. 106, 152–154 (2018). minor review pending
Weiss, J., Kee, D.: A direct performance comparison between loosely coupled and tightly coupled GPS/INS integration techniques. In: Proc. 51st Annu. Meet. Inst. Navig., Colorado Springs, pp. 537–544. (1995)
Wei, M., Schwarz, K.P.: Testing a decentralized filter for GPS/INS integration. In: Proc. IEEE Symp. Position Locat. Navig. (1990)
Scherzinger, B.: Precise robust positioning with inertially aided RTK. J. Inst. Navig. 53(2), 73–83 (2006)
Greenspan, R.: Inertial navigation technology from 1970 to 1995. J. Inst. Navig. 42, 165–186 (1995)
Legat, K.: Approximate direct georeferencing in national coordinates. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 60, 239–255 (2006)
Skaloud, J., Legat, K.: Theory and reality of direct georeferencing in national coordinates. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 63, 272–282 (2008)
Rehak, M., Skaloud, J.: Fixed-wing micro aerial vehicle for accurate corridor mapping. In: ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. II-1/W4, pp. 23–31. (2015) https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-II-1-W1-23-2015
Cramer, M., Stallmann, D.: System calibration for direct georeferencing. In: ISPRS Comm. III Symp. Photogramm. Comput. Vis., Graz, p. 6. (2002)
Kruck, E.: Combined IMU and sensor calibration with BINGO-F. In: Proc. OEEPE Workshop Integr. Sens. Orientat. pp. 84–108. (2001). CD-ROM
Skaloud, J., Schaer, P.: Towards a more rigorous boresight calibration. In: ISPRS Int. Workshop Theory Technol. Real. Inert. GPS Sens. Orientat., Castelldefels (2003)
Cosandier, D.: Generating a Digital Elevation Model and Orthomosaic from Pushbroom Imagery. Univ. Calgary, Calgary (1999). UCGE Report No. 20133
Tempelmann, U., Hinsken, L.: Triangulation of ADS40 pushbroom image blocks – Not much different from classical frame blocks? In: SGPBF Annu. Meet. (2005)
Burman, H.: Calibration and Orientation of Airborne Image and Laser Scanner Data Using GPS and INS. PhD thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm (2000)
Kager, H.: Discrepancies between overlapping laser scanning strips – Simultaneous fitting of aerial laser scanner strips. In: The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 555–560. (2004)
Morin, K., El-Sheimy, N.: Post-mission adjustment of airborne laser scanning data. In: FIG XXII Int. Congr. Washington, p. 12. (2002)
Friess, P.: Toward a rigorous methodology for airborne laser mapping. In: Proc. EuroCOW, p. 7. (2006). on CDROM
Skaloud, J., Lichti, D.: Rigorous approach to bore-sight self calibration in airborne laser scanning. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 61, 47–59 (2006)
Longuet-Higgins, H.C.: A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature 293, 133–135 (1981)
Hartley, R.I.: In defence of the 8-point algorithm. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 19(6), 580–593 (2012)
Schmid, C., Mohr, R., Bauckhage, C.: Evaluation of interest point detectors. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 37(2), 151–172 (2000)
Jazayeri, I., Fraser, C.: Interest operators for feature-based matching in close range photogrammetry. Photogramm. Rec. 25(129), 24–41 (2010)
Haralick, R.M., Shapiro, L.G.: Computer and Robot Visions. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1992)
Förstner, W., Gülch, E.: A fast operator for detection and precise location of distinct points, corners and centers of circular features. In: Proc. ISPRS Intercomm. Workshop Fast Process. Photogramm. Data, pp. 281–305. (1987)
Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proc. 4th Alvey Vis. Conf. pp. 147–151. (1988)
Lowe, D.G.: Distinctive image features from scale invariant key points. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 60(2), 91–110 (2004)
Mikolajczyk, K., Schmid, C.: A performance evaluation of local descriptors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 27(10), 1615–1630 (2005)
Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications ACM 24, 381–395 (1981)
Nistér, D.: An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26(6), 756–770 (2004)
Szeliski, R.: Computer Vision: Algorithms and Applications. Springer, London (2010)
Hirschmüller, H.: Stereo processing by semiglobal matching and mutual information. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 30(2), 328–341 (2008)
Haala, N.: Dense Image Matching Final Report, pp. 115–145 (2014). Tech. Rep., EuroSDR Official Publication No. 64
Colomina, I., Blazquez, M.: A unified approach to static and dynamic modeling in photogrammetry and remote sensing. In: The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 35-B1, pp. 178–183. (2004)
Kerstling, A.P., Habib, A., Bang, K.I., and Skaloud, J.: Automated approach for rigorous light detection and ranging system calibration without preprocessing and strict terrain coverage requirements. Opt. Eng. 51(7), 076201 (2012)
Strasdat, H., Montiel, J., Davison, A.: Real-time monocular slam: Why filter? In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), pp. 2657–2664. (2010)
Cucci, D.A., Rehak, M., Skaloud, J.: Bundle adjustment with raw inertial observations in UAV applications. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 130, 1–12 (2017)
Freyer, J., Brown, D.: Lens distortion for close-range photogrammetry. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 52, 51–58 (1986)
Gruen, A.: The accuracy potential of the modern bundle block adjustment in aerial photogrammetry. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 48, 45–54 (1982)
Rehak, M., Skaloud, J.: Time synchronization of consumer cameras on micro aerial vehicles. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 123(1), 114–123 (2017)
Förstner, W., Wrobel, B.: Mathematical concepts in photogrammetry. In: McGlone, J., Mikhail, E. (eds.) Manual of Photogrammetry, 5th edn., pp. 15–180. ASPRS, Bethesda (2004)
Bjerhammar, A.: Theory of Errors and Generalized Matrix Inverses. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1973)
Kummerle, R., Grisetti, G., Strasdat, H., Konolige, K., Burgard, W.: g\({}^{2}\)o: A general framework for graph optimization. In: IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), pp. 3607–3613. IEEE, New York (2011)
Davis, T.A.: Direct Methods for Sparse Linear Systems. SIAM, Philadelphia (2006)
Cucci, D., Skaloud, J.: On inertial measurements in dynamics networks. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. IV-2/W5, pp. 549–557. (2019)
Hoffman, O., Nave, P., Ebner, H.: DPS – A digital photogrammetric system for producing digital elevation models and orthophotos by means of linear array scanner imagery. In: The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 216–227. (1982)
Cramer, M.: The ADS40 Vaihingen/Enz geometric performance test. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 60, 363–374 (2006)
Ebner, H.: Self calibrating block adjustment. In: XIIIth Congr. Int. Soc. Photogramm. Com. V., Stockholm (1978)
Filin, S., Vosselman, G.: Adjustment of airborne laser altimetry strips. In: ISPRS XXth Congr. Geo-Imagery Bridg. Cont. pp. 285–289. (2004)
Glira, F., Pfeifer, N., Mandelburger, G.: Hybrid orientation of airborne lidar point clouds and aerial images. In: he International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. IV-2/W5, pp. 567–574. (2019)
Filin, S.: Recovery of systematic biases in laser altimetry data using natural surfaces. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 69(11), 1235–1242 (2003)
El-Sheimy, N., Valeo, C., Habib, A.: Digital Terrain Modeling. Artech House, Norwood (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skaloud, J., Cramer, M., Haala, N. (2022). Data Acquisition in Geographic Information Systems. In: Kresse, W., Danko, D. (eds) Springer Handbook of Geographic Information. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53125-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53125-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53124-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53125-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)