Numerical Modeling and Simulation for Water Management

Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 93)


Global change processes like increasing population, haphazard urbanization and climate change have resulted huge pressure on natural resources. In this context, it is natural to think of how water cycle will be altered by such global change processes. Currently, more than half of the global population resides in urban areas, and thus, urban water security is of great concern. Hydrologic simulation models enable to assess various implications of the global change processes on water resources variables. Various hydrologic models are available for simulating the water resources variables. Each of the hydrologic models has some specific features. The hydrologic models are largely used for investigating impacts of urbanization and climate change on water resources variables like runoff, groundwater recharge, etc. Hydrologic models are categorized into various ways. Based on length of simulation time, a model can be of continuous or event-based type. Hydrologic models are also popularly classified as empirical, conceptual and physical types. Hydrologic simulation models require various data and tools which are available with different agencies. It is important to have easy access to such data and tools for the sustainable water management. Hydrologic modeling requires various kinds of spatial and temporal data for the model setup and prediction of water resources variables. Collection, analysis and integration of such spatial and temporal data with a hydrologic model is complex job. Remote sensing data and geographic information system can be easily linked with a hydrologic model and enable hydrologic simulations easier and reliable. This chapter discusses numerical modeling and simulations for the water management with focus on their types, applications, data access and spatial analysis tools.


  1. Broxton PD, Zeng X, Sulla-Menashe D, Troch PA (2014) a global land cover climatology using modis data. J Appl Meteor Climatol 53:1593–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Devi GK, Ganasri BP, Dwarakish GS (2015) A review on hydrological models. Aquat Proc 4:1001–1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Elliott AH, Trowsdale SA (2007) A review of models of low impact urban stormwater drainage. Environ Model Softw 22:394–405. Scholar
  4. Emam AR, Mishra BK, Kumar P, Masago Y, Fukushi K (2016) Impact assessment of climate and land-use changes on flooding behavior in the upper Ciliwung River, Jakarta, Indonesia. Water 8, 559;
  5. Landström C, Whatmore SJ, Lane SN (2011) Virtual engineering: computer simulation modelling for flood risk management in England. Sci Stud 24(2):3–22Google Scholar
  6. Ma X, Xue X, Gonzalez-Mejia A, Garland J, Cashdollar J (2015) Sustainable water systems for the city of tomorrow—a conceptual framework. Sustainability 7:12071–12105.
  7. Malczewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Prog Plan 62(1):3–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Malve O, Tattari S, Riihimaki J, Jaakkola E, Voss A, Williams R, Baerlund I (2012) Estimation of diffuse pollution loads in europe for continental scale modelling of loads and in-stream river water quality. Hydrol Process 26:2385–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mbilinyi BP, Tumbo SD, Mahoo HF, Mkiramwinyi FO (2007) GIS-based decision support system for identifying potential sites for rainwater harvesting. Phys Chem Earth, Parts A/B/C 32(15):1074–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mishra BK, Regmi RK, Masago Y, Fukushi K, Kumar P, Saraswat C (2017) Assessment of Bagmati river pollution in Kathmandu valley: scenario-based modeling and analysis for sustainable urban development. Sustain Water Quality Ecol 9–10:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitchell VG, Duncan H, Inman M, Rahilly M, Stewart J, Vieritz A, Holt P, Grant A, Fletcher TD, Coleman J, Maheepala S, Sharma A, Deletic A, Breen P (2007) State of the art review of integrated urban water models. Novatech—Lyon, France, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  12. Phuong HT, Tien NX, Chikamori H, Okubo K (2018) A hydrological tank model assessing historical runoff variation in the Hieu River Basin. Asian J Water Environ Pollut 15(1):75–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Regan RM, Jackson TJ (1980) Runoff synthesis using landsat and SCS Model. J Hydraulics Division, ASCE 106:667–678Google Scholar
  14. Todini T (1988) Rainfall-runoff modeling—past, present and future. J Hydrol 100(1–3):341–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Weng Q (2001) Modeling urban growth effects on surface runoff with the integration of remote sensing and GIS. Environ Manage 28(6):737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wurbs RA (1994) Computer models for water resources planning and management. IWR Report 94-NDS-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and TechnologyPokhara UniversityPokharaNepal
  2. 2.Faculty of Sustainability StudiesHosei UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Natural Resources and Ecosystem ServicesInstitute for Global Environmental StrategiesHayamaJapan
  4. 4.The Fenner School of Environment & SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations