Advertisement

Urban Water Security Challenges

Chapter
  • 147 Downloads
Part of the Water Science and Technology Library book series (WSTL, volume 93)

Abstract

Water security is a new concept for the sustainable water management. Rapid urbanization and climate change have become a burden for water security managers. It is important to understand and investigate various challenges and impacts of global environment changes for managing water-related problems like frequent urban floods; groundwater water depletion; surface and groundwater pollution; land subsidence and aquatic ecosystems. Urbanization leads to more impervious surface causing increased storm runoff and decreased groundwater recharge resulting in greater floods and groundwater table depletion. Similarly, climate change is reported for alteration of rainfall pattern with more extreme rainfall events and longer dry days resulting in greater floods and lower groundwater table. Therefore, haphazard urbanization, climate change, population growth and change in lifestyle have badly affected urban water environment. In many cases, urbanization rate is quite higher in comparison to capacity of local government which is mainly engaged in development and construction of water infrastructures like water supply and sanitation system, stormwater drainage and flood management system. This chapter is focused on various global environmental changes with focus on urbanization and climate change and their implications on urban water security. Case studies have been included for better illustrations.

2.1 Background

Water is essential for the survival of animal and plant life. At global scale, availability of usable water resources is well above total demand (Oki and Kanae 2006). However, the distribution of water resources is not uniform either spatially or temporarily. There is a definite surplus of water during the rainy season while significant water deficit occurs during dry season. For increasing water security in urban areas, the phenomena like devastating floods, reliable water supply for drinking, irrigation, hydropower among others that are associated with excessive and scarce water must be managed well. The rapid growth of population, with extension of irrigated agriculture and industrial development has increased the demand of water. As the Earth’s population has been growing rapidly, more stress is being put on the land to support the increased population. One question that arises is how water resources will be affected. In several cases, water shortages have led to conflicts over the rights of the water. Environmental issues such as provision of clean water, production and processing of wastewater and flooding and land subsidence are frequently reported in many cities. With industrial and domestic water demand expected to double by 2050, competition among urban, peri-urban and rural areas will further deteriorate (Jalilov et al. 2018; UNDP 2006). In many urban areas, the sustainable use of water is approaching or exceeding the limits (Hatt et al. 2004; Mitchell et al. 2003). In the urban basin, competition between agriculture and industry is intensifying (Bahri 2012). The unplanned urbanization is highlighted by the degraded environment in the urban areas due to changes in hydrology of catchments and modified riparian ecosystems.

In addition to various influences, it is important to consider the effects of two crucial issues: urbanization and climate change on water environment, such as surface runoff, stream flow, flooding, river pollution, biodiversity, and groundwater recharge. In context of climate change and urbanization, the negative impacts are exacerbating resulting greater runoff, pollutant loads and pressure on existing systems.

Urbanization leads to the formation of an impermeable surface, which increases the runoff and downstream floods and less recharge of groundwater (Fig. 2.1). Ultimately, the loss of recharge affects the supply of residential and municipal water. As industrialization continues, more of the world’s population becomes concentrated in urban areas, with greater stress on available water resources in smaller area. Builtup areas have increased through both formal as well as nonformal businesses and settlements (Kefi et. al. 2018). This increase has not been adequately supported by the increases of environmental service capacities to check the consequence of the development.
Fig. 2.1

Illustrative sketch for the impacts of land-use change on water cycle (Adopted from Saraswat et al. 2016)

Similar to urbanization (land-use change), climate change affects local hydrological cycles by producing more surface runoff and decreasing the base flow, interflow and depression storage. Community planners, developers and citizens should be aware of the impacts of land-use and climate change on their environmental resources. Anticipating the rate, amount and duration of rainfall in each heavy rain event under climate change is highly important in planning and designing of stormwater management facilities, erosion and sediment control structures, flood protection structures and many other civil engineering structures involving hydrologic flows.

It is well accepted that traditional urban water management approach is largely unsuitable to address current and future sustainability issues (Ashley et al. 2005; Wong and Brown 2008). The conventional approach to manage urban water systems, around the world, has seen the use of a similar series of systems for drainage of stormwater, potable water and sewerage. United Nations (UN Agenda 21 1992) defined achieving sustainable urban water systems and protecting the quality and quantity of freshwater resources as key components of ecologically sustainable development. It is important to plan, design and manage water resources system very carefully and intelligently. Minimizing the disturbance on an urbanizing watershed is one way of ensuring continued water supply and decreasing urban floods. Because each land use has different levels of influence, careful physical planning can minimize these effects. Although the influence of urban sprawl on groundwater recharge, and the quantity and quality of surface water is of considerable importance, many planners, urban managers and water resource experts lack to incorporate the potential hydrological impacts of climate and land-use change. Science-based system that justifies the relative impact of both urbanization and climate change on stormwater runoff at local scale is largely warranted in the changing environment. This chapter focuses on the risks of two major threats: urbanization and climate change on water security which is defined as ‘the reliable availability of an acceptable quantity and quality of water for health, livelihoods and production, coupled with an acceptable level of water-related risks.’ Water security also means addressing the adverse effects of environmental protection and poor management. It is also concerned with ending fragmented responsibility for water and integrating water resources management across all sectors-finance, planning, agriculture, energy, tourism, industry, education and health. A water-secure world reduces poverty, advances education and improves living standards.

2.2 Urbanization

The urban population of the world has grown rapidly from 746 million in 1950 to 3.9 billion in 2014 (UN-DESA 2014). Since the Universal Declaration of human rights in 1948, cities and towns are believed to be a norm of primary human living standards and are now globally accepted because of the many benefits city space provides to the improvement of human well-being. According to the World Economic and Social Survey 2013 report, a net 1.3 billion people were added to small urban cities, 632 million added to medium and 570 million was added to the large urban centers, in total about 2.5 billion people were added to the global urban population between 1950 and 2010. The United Nations Population Division marked 2007 as a year when the number of people living in urban areas became more than half of the world total population (Fig. 2.2). The global urban population has further been predicted to exceed 70% by 2050, estimated to be 6.25 billion, and about 80% of this figure has been projected to live in developing nations and highly concentrated in Africa and Asia. Ismail (2014) recently reported that, at regional level over the past decades, the southeast Asian region has seen greater increase (nearly two times during 1985–2010) in the population in urban area. Unprecedented increase in urban population has added several challenges such as slum expansion and deterioration of water environment.
Fig. 2.2

Annual urban and rural population estimates of the world during 1950–2050 (Source ‘World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision’ database)

Rapid urbanization and economic growth have resulted in widespread environmental degradation in urban areas. The imbalances are unavoidable, because urbanization leads to significant demographic, sociocultural, environment and political changes that eventually affect the realization of the idea of urban sustainability. City is the center of economic growth, job creation, innovation and cultural exchange. This is because the cities in developing countries are largely concentrated on production activities providing greater opportunity for additional income. Cities provide better woman participation, health access, literacy rate and upward social mobility. Grubler and Fisk (2013) found that the average urban gross domestic product (GDP) accounts for about 80% of world GDP. The concentration of people, economic activities and services in relatively small areas has big impact on urban society and the economy. Urban economies lead to better access to services, higher prosperity and lifestyle changes, but rapid urbanization also leads to increased slums and squatter settlements, social alienation and environmental pollution. Positive and negative impacts of urbanization are not evenly distributed among urban populations. Rich and powerful are more benefited from positive effects and better protected from adverse effects than poor and alienated people.

In developing countries, urbanization is occurring at a high rate. In 2013, the United Nations Economic and Social Division reported that the land-use patterns and urbanization is diverse in developed and developing countries. The growth of cities in developing countries is at rapid pace and often concentrated in the capital. Urbanization leads to increased impervious surface areas, and the construction of stormwater drainage networks increases the time of concentration and direct runoff, thereby resulting in a more rapid rise in flow rate and depletion of groundwater table (Saraswat et al. 2016, 2017; Willems et al. 2012). In addition, natural water bodies such as lakes, wetlands which can hold a significant amount of flood water are being reduced or filled resulting increased incidence of flooding. The city’s growth, reported by Seto et al. (2011), drives the change of local regional environment by creating the most human-dominated landscape and transforming the land cover, hydrology system and organisms. The hiccups are that these areas do not have the capacity to invest in building resilience to these possible disasters. Therefore, these require innovative, locally focused, new analytical space modeling methods that include all variables of land-use changes.

2.3 Climate Change

Water management is planned based on local conditions. Climate change has major impact on the water resource system (Mishra et al. 2019a, b; Kharrazi et al. 2017; IPCC 2014). Recognizing the importance of water resources, many studies have been done to investigate the effects of climate change on precipitation patterns and hydrological structures. These studies suggested varying regional trends (increasing or decreasing) in the future due to climate change. In particular, precipitation increases in wet areas, decreases in arid areas. Most of the studies indicated that heavy precipitation events (frequency and intensity) will increase in future. Changing weather regime will bring prolonged droughts and excessive rains.

Climate change impacts such as the amount, timing and intensity of rain events, in combination with land development, can significantly affect the amount of stormwater runoff that needs to be managed. In some regions, the combination of climate and land-use change may make existing stormwater-related flooding worse, while other areas may be minimally affected. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC 2014) reported that among the most challenging anthropogenic environmental, economic and social global issue today is climate change. It is reported that climate change is mainly caused by the increase in the concentration of greenhouse GHG in the atmosphere. The carbon emissions are typically attributed to anthropogenic aspects such as land-use changes including agricultural, forestry sectors and city energy demand through fossil fuels and biomass consumption.

Climate change projections are widely used to assess likely future impacts. Global climate models are currently the most credible tools available for simulating the response of the global climate system to increasing greenhouse gas concentrations and provide climatic variables, such as temperature and precipitation. Several GCM projections are available based on some possible scenarios of global warming and CO2 generation rates. These projections are available for current and future climate (IPCC 2014). Multiple GCMs and scenarios are used to reflect the uncertainty associated climate change. In the climate modeling community, projections are available in terms of four emission scenarios: one mitigation scenario (RCP2.6), two medium stabilization scenarios (RCP4.5/RCP6) and one very high baseline emission scenario (RCP8.5).

Due to great amount of uncertainty associated with the scenarios and projections, use of multiple GCM is recommended to provide the range of recommendations for addressing various climate change impacts. GCM outputs are largely biased when compared with observation data due to flaws in model structure and coarse resolution input. Therefore, direct use of GCM precipitation outputs is considered not suitable for the climate change impact assessment at basin level. Downscaling enables minimization of biases in GCM outputs to be used at local scale climate change impact assessment. There are several downscaling techniques available to transform GCM outputs to local scale for reliable impact assessment. Dynamical downscaling technique converts GCM outputs into local climate data by enhancing atmospheric circulations and climate variables to finer spatial scales using regional climate models. Statistical downscaling techniques use models of correspondence between GCM contemporary climate scenarios data and real-world data.

2.4 Implications on Water Security

Population increase coupled with urbanization and changing climate out constrains water security in many ways. Rapid urbanization and global climate change will greatly alter water environment in developing cities. This section examines both qualitative and quantitative aspects of water security. It identifies water security in the megacity in terms of threats to the environment such as flood relating it to urbanization and climate change. It also examines water security threats in megacity in the case of inadequate water supply relating it to urbanization and climate change.

2.4.1 Hydrological Cycle

In a natural environment, the small percentage of precipitation becomes surface runoff, but as the urbanization is growing and the development expanding, the percentage of stormwater increased abruptly (Fig. 2.1). The surface water runoff is created when pervious or impervious surfaces are saturated from precipitation or snow melt (Durrans 2003). Pervious surface areas absorb the water naturally to the saturation point and after which the amount of the rainwater runs off and travels via gravity to the nearest stream. This point of saturation is dependent on the landscape, soil type, evapotranspiration and the biodiversity of the area (Pierpont 2008).

Greater imperviousness (roads, roofs, pavement) resulting increased surface runoff, reduced infiltration and less groundwater. Increased drainage network also results less ground recharge and quick peak discharge. As it is well-known fact that the urbanization alters watershed hydrology as land becomes more and more covered with surfaces impervious to rain, water is redirected from groundwater recharge. In a natural setting, only very small percentage of precipitation becomes surface runoff, but as the urbanization is growing and the development expanding, this percentage of stormwater increases abruptly. This runoff normally flows into the nearest stream or river and increases the percentage of water in the system, and if it is polluted, it can lead to disastrous situations. The Center for Watershed Protection has reported that areas that exceed 10% imperviousness, stream health begin to decline (Coffman and France 2002). The urbanized watershed faces increased flooding, stream bank erosion and pollutant export. The receiving streams of these intensified storm flows alter hydraulic characteristics due to peak discharges several times higher than predevelopment. With urbanization, environmental issues such as flooding, solid waste problems, proliferation of informal settlements and air pollution are prevalent in the region. Encroachment (flood plains, obstruction of water/floodways, loss of natural flood storage) results in increased flooding. Green areas hold an important role in maintaining balance in urban environment, because of their main function as water retention slow release, while enhancing inflilration in a catchment.

2.4.2 Water Shortage

Access to clean and adequate water remains a critical challenge and an acute seasonal problem in urban areas. Freshwater is crucial to human society—not just for drinking, but also for farming, washing and many other activities. It is expected to become increasingly scarce in the future, and this is partly due to climate change. Rainfall distribution/pattern in a year will alter significantly with the climate change, although it is projected to alter not much at annual scale. Greater rainfall due to climate change leads to more rapid movement of water from the atmosphere back to the oceans, reducing our ability to store and use it. The overall effect is an intensification of the water cycle that causes more extreme floods and droughts.

2.4.3 Land Subsidence

Highly urbanized cities rely heavily on groundwater for water supply resulting in uncontrolled withdrawal from groundwater aquifers. Rapid urbanization has reduced aquifer recharge and has resulted in declining groundwater levels as well as salt intrusion and land subsidence. Overextraction of groundwater is now a pressing problem in rapidly growing cities of developing nations. Illegal/unregulated construction of wells has proliferated in the region. In the urban environment, the impervious surfaces which cover the natural environment over the ground, the pattern of hydrological process of surface water runoff becomes more unnatural, causing damage to infrastructure and the impairment of receiving waters by pollutants. Indiscriminate land-use practices has impacted on the quality of surface water and modified the hydrologic conditions (Masago et al. 2019).

In urban areas, land subsidence is mainly caused by excessive groundwater extraction, higher load of constructions and infrastructures, natural consolidation of alluvium soil and natural event such as tectonic activity. For example, land subsidence in Jakarta occurs mainly because of lavish groundwater extraction and higher load of construction and infrastructures. Through years, water demand in Jakarta is gradually increasing and this phenomenon is not supported by an adequate water supply. In the long term, land subsidence would be a potential cause of flood in Jakarta. In fact, land subsidence has proven to be one of the main causes of flood in Jakarta, particularly in North Jakarta. Continuous land subsidence will also endanger drainage structures in Jakarta which can make the flood even worst.

2.4.4 Surface and Groundwater Pollution

Demands from intensive development and utilization activities, population explosion, poor environmental management—all these contribute to the poor quality of water in almost all water bodies in urban areas. The unregulated discharge of domestic and industrial wastewater and agricultural runoff had caused extensive pollution of receiving water bodies. The effluent being discharged comes in the form of raw sewage, detergents, fertilizers, heavy metals, chemical products, oils and even solid waste. Each of these pollutants has different noxious effects that influence human livelihoods and translate into economic costs. Pollutants accumulate on impervious surfaces, and the increased runoff with urbanization is a leading cause of nonpoint source pollution. Sediment, chemicals, bacteria, viruses and other pollutants are carried into receiving water bodies, resulting in degraded water quality.

It is estimated that large portion of the total garbage generated are not collected by the solid waste management agencies. The uncollected garbage goes into the river systems resulting in the clogging of waterways. This aggravates flooding in the metropolis. Wastewater is another water management issue that needs to be considered more thoroughly. Higher population density and their activity not only affect the water supply and demand but also the production of wastewater released to the river or open channel. The loss of aesthetic value of rivers and other water bodies is a direct result of the pollution of these water bodies. The presence of informal settlers living along the rivers and their tributaries also contributed to the constriction of the drainage areas, resulting to flooding during heavy rains. These informal settlers also add to the deterioration of the water quality of these water bodies.

2.4.5 Human Health

Over the last 2–3 decades, most of the water bodies in Manila have been increasingly under threat of unprecedented and uncontrolled urbanization, industrialization, population explosion in urban centers caused by mass migration into cities, unsound land-use and solid waste management practices, and unabated pollution of water and the air. With the changing climate regime as manifested by the increase in the number of typhoons resulting to flooding, the need to address the risks from a deteriorating environment has become one of the biggest challenge of the modern time. Impaired water quality will endanger community’s health, leading to the increasing of poverty level. People with lower economic condition tend to face difficulty in providing their wastewater treatment and drinking water facilities. Slum areas in Jakarta are more prone to diseases from bad sanitation and contaminated water source. People who live in those areas often suffer from diarrhea and intestinal worm infection, mainly during rainy season when flood has worsen the water contamination. The social impact apparently not only threatened community’s health but also affected community’s capacity and poverty in Jakarta.

The deteriorating quality of the water in major water bodies and urban environment situation in the metropolis is negatively affecting the overall health conditions of the population (Masago et al. 2019). A recent joint Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) and NSO Study (January 2011) indicated that there are four main causes of water-related diseases in the Philippines: drinking polluted water, contact with polluted water, infection by vector and infection by parasite. Cholera, typhoid, para-typhoid, hepatitis, dysentery and diarrhea are typical cases resulting from taking in polluted water. Scabies, conjunctivitis, typhus and trachoma are the common diseases that can be contracted from contact with polluted water. Infection by a vector transmits diseases such as malaria, dengue and yellow fever while infection by parasite can give rise to such illnesses as filariasis and schistosomiasis. In Metro Manila, diarrhea is the second or third leading causes of morbidity based on a 5-year average from 1996 to 2000 as well as in 2001.

2.4.6 Ecosystem and Biodiversity

The pressures that come with rapid development and urbanization have put so much stress on the water and the environment resulting in destabilization of ecosystems, destruction of natural habitats and an alarming rate of biodiversity losses. During the last 10–15 years witnessed the unregulated land use in Metro Manila and the neighboring provinces which caused deforestation of the surrounding watershed areas such as the Marikina and the Laguna de Bay watershed areas. The loss of vegetation has adversely affected the habitat and population flora and fauna in the area, both aquatic and nonaquatic. Low concentration of dissolved oxygen (DO), a common characteristic of the water bodies in Metro Manila, in combination with the presence of toxic substances may have led to stress response in aquatic ecosystem due to toxicity levels.

2.5 Case Studies

2.5.1 Bagmati River Flood, Nepal

Climate change impact on flood frequency was investigated in Bagmati River Basin of Nepal using bias-corrected global climate model (GCM) precipitation output (Mishra and Herath 2015). Bagmati River Basin is an important river basin of Nepal concerning its significance to flood management, and water supply for domestic and irrigation use (Fig. 2.3). Flood events are regular phenomena in the study area causing large human and infrastructural losses. Almost every year, floods in the lower Bagmati region cause substantial damage to infrastructures, human lives and their properties.
Fig. 2.3

Bagmati River Basin, Nepal

The climate change impact on flood frequency research employed a high-resolution (approximately 20-km) daily GCM precipitation output of Meteorological Research Institute (MRI), Japan. Comparison of observation and GCM data pointed out that the MRI-GCM precipitation output has significant biases in frequency and intensity values. Quantile–quantile mapping method of GCM bias correction was applied for minimizing the biases in precipitation frequencies and intensities. Concept of homogeneous precipitation regions was introduced to link the uneven observation data stations and GCM grid cells. Analyses of return period curves, shape and scale factors at different observation stations enabled delineation of three homogeneous precipitation regions. Accordingly, regional quantile–quantile bias-correction technique was developed for minimizing biases in MRI-GCM precipitation output.

A distributed rainfall runoff model enabled generation of streamflow series using bias-corrected GCM output for 1979–2003 and 2075–2099 periods, as current and future scenarios, respectively. AFFDEF, distributed rainfall-runoff model, enabled generation of daily streamflow series for the available 1979–2003 and 2075–2099 periods, as current and future climates, respectively. Using annual daily maximum streamflow series of the current and future periods, comparative flood frequency analysis was carried out for assessing likely changes in future flood events. Finally, comparative flood frequency analyses were carried out for the simulated annual daily maximum streamflow series of current and future climates. The analyses revealed that the climate change will result in more extreme precipitation events in monsoon months and less precipitation in other months. The analyses also revealed that flood events will be significantly increased in future. The range of change in 2–100 year return period floods was from 24–40% (Fig. 2.4).
Fig. 2.4

Comparison of annual daily maximum floods for different return periods

2.5.2 Ciliwung River Flood, Indonesia

Ciliwung river basin of Greater Jakarta was investigated as a case study considering frequent flood incidences in the city (Masago et al. 2019; Mishra et al. 2017). Flooding is considered one of the greatest problems that greater Jakarta is currently facing (Fig. 2.5). High flow rates in the Ciliwung River, which flows through the center of Jakarta, regularly cause extensive flooding during the rainy season. This study evaluated flood inundation in the lower Ciliwung River Basin of Greater Jakarta under rapid urbanization and climate change (Fig. 2.6). The future urbanization scenario was based on projected land-use data for 2030. The climate change impact analysis was initiated with comparison of GCM and observation precipitation data, and the results indicated a large bias in the GCM projections. A quantile–quantile bias-correction technique was applied to correct the bias in the high-resolution MRI-GCM projections. Precipitation change assessments over the Ciliwung River Basin were conducted using bias-corrected GCM precipitation data for the current and future climate scenarios. Comparison of 1-day maximum precipitation for 50- and 100-year return period for current and future climate conditions revealed that extreme precipitation events will significantly increase in the future and cause more frequent and larger extreme floods. The HEC-HMS lumped hydrological model was used to simulate the impact of climate and land-use change on the peak discharge in the upper Ciliwung watershed. The peak flow and flood volumes are predicted to increase with rapid urbanization and climate change (Fig. 2.7).
Fig. 2.5

Jakarta skyline after heavy rainfall that caused flood on 10–11 February 2015

Fig. 2.6

Comparative land-use maps of Greater Jakarta, Indonesia a 2009 original b 2030 original c 2009 derived and d 2030 derived

Fig. 2.7

Compartive hydrographs showing impact of urbanization on peak discharge in 2030 from 2007 in Ciliwung River Basin

Precipitation output of the MRI-CGCM3, MIROC5 and HadGEM2-ES General Circulation Models (GCMs) with RCP 4.5 and 8.5 emission scenario over periods 1985–2004 and 2020–2039 representing current and future climate conditions, respectively, was used. Similarly, land-use data of 2009 and 2030 were used to represent the current and future conditions, respectively. FLO-2D, a two-dimensional hydrodynamic model, was used to simulate current and future flood inundation simulations (Figs. 2.8 and 2.9). Increasing flood inundation areas and depths (6–31% for different GCMs) in the future reveal the need to improve flood management tools for the sustainable development of urban water environments. The flood inundation extent and depths under the future conditions were found significantly higher than those under the current condition. These findings clearly emphasize the need for further flood adaptations and mitigation measures for sustainable urban development.
Fig. 2.8

a Comparison of flood inundation area for 50-years return period. b Comparison of flood inundation area for 100-years return period

Fig. 2.9

Comparison of flood inundation under the current and future conditions

2.6 Summary

Sustainable development will not be achieved without a water-secure world. A water-secure world integrates a concern for the intrinsic value of water with a concern for its use for human survival and well-being. The importance of this chapter comes from its enhanced understanding of urbanization and climate change on extreme flood events for sustainable urban water management. This chapter was aimed at suggesting policy foresight for infrastructure and land-use management facilitating the need to address challenges to urban sustainability through planning in advance for a population that is projected to come, planning at the local scale anticipating the expected urban growth or resource availability. Therefore, urban expansion through infrastructure development can be demonstrated to contribute to the adverse impacts on ecological sustainability and the high demand of natural resource use within city boundaries. Based on the modeling scenario, protected area zones are considered to constrain change during the modeling process.

The increase in the precipitation and flood pattern will have major implications on the design, operations and maintenance of municipal wastewater management infrastructure. The results of climate and land-use change impacts reflect that the design standards and guidelines currently employed needs revision. Increased peak flows and flood inundation should be considered in future flood management systems, and flexible, adaptive measures should be adopted because of the uncertainty of future climate and land-use changes.

The rapid urbanization coupled with the slow infrastructure development has exerted a tremendous impact on the water resources and urban environment. The increasing population of the metropolis had resulted in the increasing informal settler families. This contributed to the deterioration of the river systems due to untreated waste discharges and increasing incidence of flooding due to the alteration of drainage patterns and waterways. The unplanned expansion of urban areas also led to traffic congestion in the city resulting to increase air pollution and greenhouse gas emission.

Addressing the diversity of issues of urbanization, inclusive economic opportunity, technological innovations, sustainability while still offering a livelihood for the world population has been a great challenge. It has enlightened both the global and local communities to the long-term consequences of our decade-long form of designing cities. That has led to current environmental and inequality related impacts such as water scarcity, air pollution, traffic congestion, cyclones, hurricanes, floods, rampant increase of urban slums, power outages and disease outbreaks. The inequality on who receives better affordable housing and basic environmental services depends somehow on an individual’s economic level.

References

  1. Ashley RM, Balmforth DJ, Saul AJ, Blanksby JR (2005) Flooding in the future. Water Sci Technol 52(5):265–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahri A (2012) Integrated Urban Water Management, GWP Technical Background Papers, Global Water Partnership, Stockholm Number 16Google Scholar
  3. Coffman LS, France RL (2002) Low-impact development: an alternative stormwater management technology. In: Handbook of water sensitive planning and design, pp 97–123Google Scholar
  4. Durrans SR (2003) Stormwater conveyance modeling and design. Haestad Press, Waterbury, CTGoogle Scholar
  5. Grübler A, Fisk D (eds) (2013) Energizing sustainable cities: assessing urban energy. Routledge, Abingdon, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  6. Hatt B, Deletic A, Fletcher T (2004) Integrated stormwater treatment and re-use systems—inventory of Australian practice. Technical Report, Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  7. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability, fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  8. Ismail R (2014) South-East Asian urbanization and the challenge to sustainability: implications for the environment and health. Environ Policy Law 44:55Google Scholar
  9. Jalilov S, Kefi M, Kumar P, Masago Y, Mishra BK (2018) Sustainable urban water management: application for integrated assessment in Southeast Asia. Sustainability 10:122.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010122
  10. Kefi M, Mishra BK, Kumar P, Masago Y, Fukushi K (2018) Assessment of tangible direct flood damage using a spatial analysis approach under the effects of climate change: case study in an urban watershed in Hanoi, Vietnam. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 7:29.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7010029
  11. Kharrazi A, Kumar P, Saraswat C, Avtar R, Mishra BK (2017) Adapting water resources planning to a changing climate: towards a shift from option robustness to process robustness for stakeholder involvement and social learning. J Clim Change 3(2):81–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Masago Y, Mishra BK, Jalilov S, Kefi M, Kumar P, Dilley M, Fukushi K (2019) Future Outlook of Urban Water Environment in Asian Cities. United Nations University: Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  13. Mishra BK, Herath S (2015) Assessment of future floods in Bagmati River Basin of Nepal using bias corrected daily GCM precipitation data. J Hydrologic Eng ASCE,  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001090
  14. Mishra BK, Emam AR, Masago Y, Kumar P, Regmi RK, Fukushi K (2017) Assessment of future flood inundations under climate and land use change scenarios in the Ciliwung River Basin, Jakarta. J Flood Risk Manage.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12311
  15. Mishra BK, Mansoor A, Saraswat C, Gautam A (2019a) Climate change adaptation through optimal stormwater capture measures. APN Sci Bull 9(1).  https://doi.org/10.30852/sb.2019.590
  16. Mishra BK, Mebeelo K, Chakraborty S, Kumar P, Gautam A (2019b) Implications of urban expansion on land use and land cover: towards sustainable development of Mega Manila, Philippines. GeoJournal.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10105-2
  17. Mitchell VG, McMahon TA, Mein RG (2003) Components of the total water balance of an urban catchment. Environ Manag 32(6):735–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oki T, Kanae S (2006) Global hydrological cycles and world water resources. Science 313:1068–1072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pierpont L (2008) Simulation-optimization framework to support sustainable watershed development by mimicking the pre-development flow regime, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA Master’s ThesisGoogle Scholar
  20. Saraswat C, Kumar P, Mishra BK (2016) Assessment of stormwater runoff management practices and governance under climate change and urbanization: an analysis of Bangkok, Hanoi and Tokyo. J Environ Sci Policy 64:101–117Google Scholar
  21. Saraswat C, Mishra BK, Kumar P (2017) Integrated urban water management scenario modeling for sustainable water governance in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Sustain Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0471-z
  22. Seto KC, Fragkias M, Güneralp B, Reilly MK (2011) A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS ONE 6(8):e23777Google Scholar
  23. UN (2015) Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/RES/70/1 (http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E)
  24. UN Agenda 21 (1992) United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/ Agenda21.pdf
  25. UN-DESA (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United NationsGoogle Scholar
  26. UNDP (2006) Beyond scarcity: power, poverty and the global water crisis, Human Development Report 2006, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Willems P, Olsson J, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, Beecham S, Pathirana A, Bülow-Gregersen I, Madsen H, Nguyen VTV (2012) Limitations and pitfalls of climate change impact analysis on urban rainfall extremes. In: 9th international workshop on precipitation in urban areas: urban challenges in rainfall analysis, St. Moritz, 6–9 Dec 2012Google Scholar
  28. Wong T, Brown R (2008) Transitioning to water sensitive cities: ensuring resilience through a new hydro-social contract. In: Proceedings of 11th international conference on urban drainage, Edinburgh, Scotland, UKGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering, Faculty of Science and TechnologyPokhara UniversityPokharaNepal
  2. 2.Faculty of Sustainability StudiesHosei UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Natural Resources and Ecosystem ServicesInstitute for Global Environmental StrategiesHayamaJapan
  4. 4.The Fenner School of Environment & SocietyAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations