Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Material Trajectories: How Issues Come to Matter in a Citizen Conference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communicating Science and Technology in Society

  • 249 Accesses

Abstract

It is widely assumed that the key component of public engagement with science is deliberation. However, determining concrete political recommendations for a given issue is a complex process throughout which several processes of translation occur, not all having to do with the discursive realm. This article supposes experimentation focused on putting materiality into the fore in the making of policy recommendations in an empirical case: the Barcelona ICT Citizen Conference for Older People. The resulting ethnographic collaboration allowed the authors to report the process of production of a recommendation document. The precarious translation trajectory by which concerns—and proposals for addressing those concerns—emerged is detailed herein. Finally, this chapter shows how different assemblages (consisting not only of humans) are needed to sustain the viability of a specific issue: the concern regarding electromagnetic waves. We ultimately aim to encourage more intelligent and sustainable engagements with vibrant matter and lively things. However, rather than proposing a general analogy to life, we suggest that close attention must still be paid to the specific matter at hand.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrahamsson, S., Bertoni, F., Mol, A., & Martín, R. I. (2015). Living with omega-3: New materialism and enduring concerns. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(1), 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M., & Latour, B. (1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259–264). MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, I. E., & Jæger, B. (1999). Scenario workshops and consensus conferences: Towards more democratic decision-making. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 331–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2009). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., & Keenan, M. (2012). Orienting European innovation systems towards grand challenges and the roles that FTA can play. Science and Public Policy, 39(2), 140–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callén, B., Domènech, M., López, D., & Tirado, F. (2009). Telecare research: (Cosmo) politicizing methodology. ALTER-European Journal of Disability Research/Revue Européenne de Recherche sur le Handicap, 3(2), 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32, 196–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2009). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, G. M. (2010). Citizenship and structured dependency: The implications of policy design for senior political power. Ageing and Society, 30(2), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In J. Bennett, P. Cheah, M. A. Orlie, & E. Grosz (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics (pp. 1–43). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, G. (2007). What is political in sub-politics? How Aristotle might help STS. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 781–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everingham, J. A., Petriwskyj, A., Warburton, J., Cuthill, M., & Bartlett, H. (2009). Information provision for an age-friendly community. Ageing International, 34(1–2), 79–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundahl, J. (1995). The Danish consensus conference model. In Public participation in science: The role of consensus conferences in Europe (pp. 31–40). London: Science Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1993). Struggles for recognition in constitutional states. European Journal of Philosophy, 1(2), 128–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2010). Facticidad y validez. Sobre el Derecho y el Estado democrático de derecho en términos de teoría del discurso. Madrid: Trotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hörning, G. (1999). Citizens’ panels as a form of deliberative technology assessment. Science and Public Policy, 26(5), 351–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2007). Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues, 14(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, A., Jensen, T. E., & Jones, K. E. (2013). The good, the bad and the perfect: Criticizing engagement practice. Social Studies of Science, 43(1), 118–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lach, D., & Sanford, S. (2010). Public understanding of science and technology embedded in complex institutional settings. Public Understanding of Science, 19(2), 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition. Knowledge and Society, 6(1), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1990). Technology is society made durable. The Sociological Review, 38, 103–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Turning around politics: A note on Gerard de Vries’ paper. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 811–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, B. (2009). Replicating participatory devices: The consensus conference confronts nanotechnology. CSI Working Paper Series 018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming and topology. The Sociological Review, 47, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2002). Aircraft stories: Decentering the object in technoscience. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In W. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 21–52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Mol, A. (1995). Notes on materiality and sociality. The Sociological Review, 43(2), 274–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lezaun, J., & Soneryd, L. (2007). Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science, 16(3), 279–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liboiron, M. (2016). Redefining pollution and action: The matter of plastics. Journal of Material Culture, 21(1), 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lury, C., & Wakeford, N. (Eds.). (2012). Inventive methods: The happening of the social. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N. (2007). The issues deserve more credit: Pragmatist contributions to the study of public involvement in controversy. Social Studies of Science, 37(5), 759–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marres, N., & Lezaun, J. (2011). Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society, 40(4), 489–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mialet, H. (2009). Reincarnating the knowing subject: Scientific rationality and the situated body. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(1), 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol, A., & Law, J. (2002). Complexities: An introduction. In A. Mol & J. Law (Eds.), Complexities (pp. 1–22). Durbam: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mort, M., Finch, T., & May, C. (2009). Making and unmaking telepatients: Identity and governance in new health technologies. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 34(1), 9–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mort, M., Roberts, C., & Callen, B. (2012). Ageing with telecare: Care or coercion in austerity? Sociology of Health and Illness, 35(6), 799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mort, M., Roberts, C., Pols, J., Domenech, M., & Moser, I. (2013). Ethical implications of home telecare for older people: A framework derived from a multisited participative study. Health Expectations, 18(3), 438–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, Y. (2012). On the embeddedness of deliberative systems: Why elitist innovations matter more. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 125–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Riles, A. (2001). The network inside out. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riles, A. (2006). Documents: Artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sayes, E. (2014). Actor–Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuitmaker, T. J. (2012). Identifying and unravelling persistent problems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1021–1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1994). Atlas. Paris: Editions Julliard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. (1995). The natural contract. University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Guillem Palà & Miquel Domènech

Authors
  1. Guillem Palà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Miquel Domènech
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillem Palà .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    Ana Delicado

  2. University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Fabienne Crettaz Von Roten

  3. Institute for Social Research, Zagreb, Croatia

    Katarina Prpić

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palà, G., Domènech, M. (2021). Material Trajectories: How Issues Come to Matter in a Citizen Conference. In: Delicado, A., Crettaz Von Roten, F., Prpić, K. (eds) Communicating Science and Technology in Society. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52885-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52885-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52884-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52885-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation