Keywords

1 Proposals for the Future of Internal Crowdsourcing

1.1 Proposal 1

Platform-based crowdsourcing has seen continued pluralization and increased differentiation. Thanks to the new process flows emerging from the digital transformation, we will see crowdsourcing merge increasingly with crowdworking. This means that a specific crowdsourcing that is methodologically conceived in the narrower sense will become the exception in the everyday working scenario.

1.2 Proposal 2

Platform-based crowdworking is establishing itself increasingly in the area of industrial production, industry-related services, the private services sector, the civil service, the manual trades, and the financial sector.

1.3 Proposal 3

As virtual transaction spaces and platforms that were previously stand-alone grow together over time, new potentials of crowdsourcing unfold as part of modern crowdworking. Thinking and working in an order-related manner as well as a move away from focusing on purely vertical toward mainly horizontal value-creation chains in future, together with models of partially autonomous and agile working, will lead to a dominant culture of crowdsourcing applications. The boundaries between internal and external crowdsourcing are becoming blurred, and both dynamics are merging with one another. Due to the progressive removal of boundaries in company operations, the division between internal and external utilizations will slowly fade.

1.4 Proposal 4

The pluralization of user cultures is bringing forth different variants and models:

  1. 1.

    Internal crowdsourcing as voluntary internal innovation management

  2. 2.

    Internal crowdsourcing as order-related innovation

  3. 3.

    Internal, order-related crowdsourcing linked to selective external crowdsourcing

  4. 4.

    Internal crowdsourcing with permanently open external crowdsourcing

  5. 5.

    Flexible agile models of order-related crowdsourcing

  6. 6.

    Differing platform-related crowdwork

Evidence shows that the variants mentioned in nos. 2–6 will ultimately cover around two-thirds to three-quarters of the coming platform-based working environments.

1.5 Proposal 5

Among the big challenges facing us in the near future is the question of whether and how well the transitions between the variants named in nos. 1–6 will succeed from the point of view of the workforce. The interfaces between the variants present greater challenges than the inherent implementation within them. Working people will be forced to constantly change back and forth between these models. If the organizational models are not intelligent enough, not flexible enough, and not compatible, the result will be obstacles, time delays, errors, and failures. What is needed is an intelligent, inclusive self-management to handle these changes.

1.6 Proposal 6

Following on from Proposal 5, the question arises as to whether qualification strategies should concentrate more on the interfaces and on being able to manage these or more on the inherent processes within the respective variants.

1.7 Proposal 7

From current experiences with “self-learning” software applications and with “autonomous software systems,” it can be concluded that the variants named in Proposal 4 (nos. 2–6) will be augmented and partly controlled by “self-learning” and “autonomous” systems (software) in the near future (Schröter 2019). This would underscore the relevance of order-related processes for value creation.