Skip to main content

The Decolonial Turn: Towards a Southern Theory in Media Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Decolonial Turn in Media Studies in Africa and the Global South
  • 552 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that media and communication studies lie at the centre of Euro-American modernity. There is no doubt that the interdiscipline is the bastion of the coloniality of knowledge and its decolonization is way overdue given the indispensability of communication in the political, cultural, and epistemic liberation in the Global South. As a field as well as a social process, ‘mass communication was instrumental in the twentieth century crusade of modernity where it remained a key element in the unfolding of the future’ (Hardt in Myths for the Masses: An Essay on Mass Communication. Blackwell, London, p. 3, 2004). Decoloniality arises as a necessary moral and epistemic project to develop a nuanced praxis of decolonization agenda in the interdiscipline. Decolonization must decentre Eurocentrism and imperial theories and deprovincialize the marginalized alternate epistemologies in media and communication studies. The aim of decolonial turn is not to reproduce a new Hegelian hierarchies or new knowledge power structures in the field, but to give birth to a truly multicultural critical media theory that emerges from intercultural and trans-epistemic dialogue between the geographic Northern and Southern epistemologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, A. (2016). The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anzaldua, G. (1987). Borderlands La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Aunt Lute Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelrouth, S. A., & Edles, D. L. (2012). Classical and Contemporary Sociological Theory. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante, M. K. (1998). The Afrocentric Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante, M. K. (2008). The Ideological Significance of Afrocentricity in Intercultural Communication. In M. K. Asante, Y. Miike, & J. Yin (Eds.), The Global Intercultural Communication Reader. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante, M. K., & Mazama, M. A. (2005). Encyclopedia of Black Studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, G. (2016). Science and the Decolonization of Social Theory: Unthinking Modernity. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. A. (2008). Race, Racism & American Law. Austin: Aspen Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R. (2015). Public Spheres, Fields, Networks: Western Concepts for a De-Westernizing World?. In C. C. Lee (Ed.), Internationalizing “International Communication”. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, G., & Kilmister, A. (2006). Critical and Post-Critical Political Economy. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral, A. (1973). Return to the Source: Selected Speeches of Amilcar Cabral. New York and London: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charkrabarty, D. (2000). Provincialising Europe: Post Colonial Thought and Historical Difference. New York: Princetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, C. Y. (1991). New Dimensions of Confucian and Neo-Confucian Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinweizu, I. (1975). The West and the Rest of Us: White Predators, Black Slavers and the African Elite. London: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2000). The Black Feminist Thought. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2007). Southern Theory. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1997). Beyond Racism and Misogyny. In C. Cohen, K. Jones, & J. Tronto (Eds.), Women Transforming Politics: An Alternative Reader. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2019). Media/Society: Industries, Images, and Audiences (6th ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., & Park, M. J. (2000). De-Westernizing Media Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (1997). Critical White Studies: Looking Behind the Mirror. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, D. H. (2003). Where We Should Go Next and Why We Probably Won’t: An Entirely Idiosyncratic, Utopian, and Unashamedly Peppery Map for the Future. In A. Valdivia (Ed.), A Companion to Media Studies. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1904). The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • During, S. (2010). Exit Capitalism: Literary Culture, Theory and Post-Secular Modernity. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. (1996). The Underside of Modernity: Apel, Ricoeur, Rorty, Taylor and the Philosophy of Liberation. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E., & Vallega, A. A. (Eds.). (2013). Ethics of Liberation: In the Age of Globalization and Exclusion. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (2004). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (2008). Black Skin White Masks. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M. (2014). Reframing Communication Rights: Why Gender Matters. In C. Padovani & A. Calabrese (Eds.), Communication Rights and Social Justice: Historical Accounts of Transnational Mobilizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. (2015). Images of Africa: Creation, Negotiation and Subversion. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (2000). Emancipation, the Media, and Modernity: Arguments About the Media and Social Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1991). The Consequences of Modernity. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. R. (2000). Existentia Africana: Understanding Africana Existential Thought. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2008). Decolonizing Political Economy and Postcolonial Studies. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 80(1), 10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2009). Transmodernity, Border Thinking, and Global Coloniality: Decolonizing Political Economy and Postcolonial Studies. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 80(1), 10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy: Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality. TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch, M., Bennett, T., Curran, J., & Woollacott, J. (2005). Culture, Society and the Media (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, H. (1992). Critical Communication Studies Communication, History and Theory in America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, H. (2004). Myths for the Masses: An Essay on Mass Communication. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1992). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. New York: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2013). The Cultural Industries. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostettler, N. (2012). Eurocentricism: A Marxian Critical Realist Critique. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2003). Global Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebede, M. (2004). Africa’s Quest for a Philosophy of Decolonization. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (1989). Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. C. (2015). Internationalizing “International Communication”. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugones, M. (2007). Heterosexualism and the Coloniality of Modern Gender System. Hypatia, 22(1), 186–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Toress, N. (2007). Coloniality of Being. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 240–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Torres, N. (2011). Thinking Through the Decolonial Turn: Post-Continental Interventions in Theory, Philosophy, and Critique. Transmodernity, 1(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2012). Define and Rule: Native as Political Identity. London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamdani, M. (2016). Between the Public Intellectual and the Scholar: Decolonization and Some Post-Independence Initiatives in African Higher Education. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 17(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649373.2016.1140260.

  • Mengara, D. M. (2001). Images of Africa: Stereotypes and Realities. Asmara: Africa World Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. D. (1999). I Am Where I Think: Epistemology and the Colonial Difference. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies: Travesia, 8(2), 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. D. (2006). Theorising the Borders: Shifting to Geo and Body Politics of Knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(5), 205–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2011). The Darker Side of Western Modernity. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. (2014). Looking for the Meaning of ‘Decolonial Gesture’. Gesto Decolonial, 11(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosco, V. (1996). The Political Economy of Communication. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosco, V. (2009). The Political Economy of Communication (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, L., & Mutsvairo, B. (2018). Can the Subaltern Think? The Decolonial Turn in Communication Research in Africa. In B. Mutsvairo (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook for Communication Research in Africa (pp. 19–40). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudimbe, V. (1988). The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowldge. London: James carey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. (2018). Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pleasants, N. (1999). Wittgenstein and the Idea of a Critical Social Theory: A Critique of Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prashad, V. J. (2012). The Darker Nations: A People’s History of the Third World. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of Power and Eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15, 215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580900015002005.

  • Rabaka, R. (2009). Africana Critical Theory: Reconstructing the Black Radical Tradition, From W. E. B. Du Bois and C. L. R. James to Frantz Fanon and Amilcar Cabral. Plymouth: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabaka, R. (2010). Against Epistemic Apartheid: W.E.B. Du Bois and the Disciplinary Decadence of Sociology. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, B. (2015). Critical Theory After the Rise of the Global South: Kaleidoscopic Dialectic. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadar, Z. (1999). Development and the Locations of Eurocentricism. In Critical Development Theory: Contributions to a New Paradigm. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. D. (2003). Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, E. W. (2004). Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient. London: Penguin Modern Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samir, A. (1990). Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a Global Failure. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2007a). Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges. Review, 30(1), 45–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2007b). Cognitive Justice in a Global World: Prudent Knowledges for Decent Life. London: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2016). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2017). Decolonizing the University: The Challenge of Deep Cognitive Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. S. (2018). The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of the Epistemologies of the South. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, W., & Lerner, D. (Eds.). (1976). Communication and Change: The Last Ten Years and the Next. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shippen, N. M. (2014). Decolonizing Time, Work, Leisure, and Freedom. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shohat, E., & Stam, R. (Eds.). (2000). Unthinking Eurocentricism: Causes, Manifestations, and Solutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, F., Peterson, T., & Schramm, W. (1956). Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunar, L., & Bulut, F. (2016). Marginalising Eurocentricism: Critics and Encounters in the Contemporary Social Structure. In S. Lufti & B. Firdevs (Eds.), Eurocentricism at the Margins: Encounters, Critiques, and Going Beyond (pp. 10–33). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thussu, D. K. (2009). Internationalizing Media Studies. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zoonen, L. (1994). Feminist Media Studies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wa Thiong’o, N. (1981). Decolonizing the Mind. Harare: Zimbabwe House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wa Thiong’o, N. (2009). Something Torn and New: An African Renaissance. New York: Basic Civitas Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2001). Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms. New York: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. (2011). De-Westernizing Communication Research: Altering Questions and Changing Frameworks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, W. (2014). Beyond Normative Dewesternization: Examining Media Culture from the Vantage Point of the Global South. The Global South, 8(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J., & Braziel, J. E. (2006). Race and the Foundations of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moyo, L. (2020). The Decolonial Turn: Towards a Southern Theory in Media Studies. In: The Decolonial Turn in Media Studies in Africa and the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52832-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics