Skip to main content
  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter situates the field of media and communication studies within the humanities that are facing an epistemic crisis that calls for new thinking, new ideas, and greater interdisciplinarity. It argues that theory in critical media and communication studies and other related disciplines has reached a dead end in terms of its explanatory and transformative power. The wellsprings of critical theory such as structuralism, poststructuralism, and postmodernism in the West are drying up and face the spectre of epistemic closure. In media and communication studies, many theories of re-animating critical thinking and transforming the field from the grip of Eurocentrism and Western universalism have been propagated mainly by scholars from the Global North. This chapter gives a panoramic view of the transformation theories existing in the field. It argues that most of the Western theories represent false alternatives for Africa and the Global South because they epitomize anti-Eurocentric Eurocentrism and the failure of Europe to think outside a colonial discourse. The chapter places hope for a trans-epistemic multicultural media and communication studies in the transformative power of decoloniality, a Southern theory that emerges from the exteriority of Euro-American imperial political and epistemic paradigms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, A. (2016). The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (2010). Global History: A View from the South. Capetown: Pambazuka Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K. A. (1994). Identity, Authenticity, Survival: Multicultural Societies and Social Reproduction. In A. Gutmann (Eds.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante, M. K. (1998). The Afrocentric Idea. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante, M. K. (2011). De-Westernizing Communication: Strategies for Neutralizing Cultural Myths. In G. Wang (Ed.), De-Westernizing Communication Research Altering Questions and Changing Frameworks. London: Routldge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bâ, S. M., & Higbee, W. (2012). De-Westernizing Film Studies. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calderón, C. A., Barranquero, A., & Tanco, E. G. (2018). From Media to Buen Vivir: Latin American Approaches to Indigenous Communication. Communication Theory, 28, 180–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castronovo, R. (1997). Compromised Narratives Along the Border: The Mason-Dixon Line, Resistance and Hegemony’ Nation. In S. Michaelsen & D. E. Johnson (Eds.), Border Theory: The Limits of Cultural Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comaroff, J., & Comaroff, J. L. (2016). Theory from the South: Or, How Euro-America Is Evolving Toward Africa. New York: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (2007). Southern Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N. (2007). Researching Media Internationalization: Comparative Media Research As if We Really Meant It. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 247–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran, J., & Park, M. J. (2000). De-Westernizing Media Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. (2009). Qualitative Inquiry Under Fire: Toward a New Paradigm Dialogue. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWit, H. (2013). Reconsidering the Concept of Internationalization. International Higher Education, 70(winter), 6-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downing, D. H. (2003). Where We Should Go Next and Why We Probably Won’t: An Entirely Idiosyncratic, Utopian, and Unashamedly Peppery Map for the Future. In A. Valdivia (Ed.), A Companion to Media Studies. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Dover Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. D. (2012). Transmodernity and Interculturality: An Interpretation from the Perspective of Philosophy of Liberation. TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(3). Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6591.

  • Eagleton. T. (2004). After Theory. Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (1990). Capitalism and Communication: Global Culture and the Economics of Information. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginev, D. (2004). The Pluralistic Public Sphere from an Ontological Point of View. In D. Freundlieb, W. Hudson, & J. F Rundell (Eds.), Critical Theory After Habermas: Encounters and Departures. Leiden: Brill Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, M. (2006). Towards a Decolonial Horizon of Pluriversality: A Dialogue with Walter Mignolo on and Around the Idea of Latin America. Lucero, Journal of the Department of Spanish and Portuguese, 17, 38–55. University of California: Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, L. (2011). Shifting the Geography of Reason in an Age of Disciplinary Decadence. in TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(2), 93–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (2005). The Southern Question (P. Verdiccio, Trans.). Toronto: Guernica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2008). Transmodernity, Border Thinking, and Global Coloniality: Decolonizing Political Economy and Postcolonial Studies. Revista Crítica de Ciências Sociais, 80(1), 10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2009). A Decolonial Approach to Political-Economy: Transmodernity, Border Thinking and Global Coloniality [Special Issue]. Kult, 6, 10–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosfoguel, R. (2011). Decolonizing Post-Colonial Studies and Paradigms of Political-Economy: Transmodernity, Decolonial Thinking, and Global Coloniality.TRANSMODERNITY: Journal of Peripheral Cultural Production of the Luso-Hispanic World, 1(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, H. (1992). Critical Communication Studies: Essays on Communication, History and Theory. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, H. (1999). Shifting Paradigms: Decentering the Discourse of Mass Communication Research. Mass Communication and Society, 2(3–4), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.1999.9677871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. (1996). African Philosophy: Myth and Reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hountondji, P. (1997). Endogenous Knowledge: Research Trails. Dakar: Codesria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1998). Notes on Globalization As a Philosophical Issue. In F. Jameson & M. Miyoshi (Eds.), The Cultures of Globalization. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jedlowski, A. (2016). Studying Media from the South: African Media Studies and Global Perspectives. Black Camera, 7(2, Spring), 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerónimo, M. B., & Monteiro, J. P. (Eds.). (2018). Internationalism, Imperialism and the Formation of the Contemporary World: The Pasts of the Present. London: Palgrave McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. E., & Michaelsen, S. (1997). Border Secrets: An Introduction. In S. Michaelsen & D. E. Johnson (Eds.), Border Theory: The Limits of Cultural Politics (pp. 1–42). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lugo, A. (1997). Reflections on Border Theory, Culture, and the Nation. In S. Michaelsen & D. E. Johnson (Eds.), Border Theory: The Limits of Cultural Politics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, A. G. (2015). The Global South in the Belly of the Beast: Viewing African American Civil Rights Through a Tricontinental Lens. Latin American Research Review, 50(1), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maldonado-Toress, N. (2007). Coloniality of Being. Cultural Studies, 21(2), 240–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M’Bayo, R. T., Onwumechilli, C., & Nwanko, N. (2000). Press and Politics in Africa. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride Commission. (1980). Many Voices One World: Towards a New More Just and More Efficient Information and Communication Order. Paris: Unesco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. D. (1999). I Am Where I Think: Epistemology and the Colonial Difference. Journal of Latin American Cultural Studies: Travesia, 8(2), 235–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. D. (2000). Local Histories/Global Designs. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, W. D. (2006). Theorising the Borders: Shifting to Geo and Body Politics of Knowledge. European Journal of Social Theory, 9(5), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miike, Y. (2007). An Asiacentric Reflection on Eurocentric Bias in Communication Theory. Communication Monographs, 74(2), 272–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750701390093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (2006). Media, Modernity, Technology: The Geography of the New. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morley, D. (2011). The Geography of Theory and the Place of Knowledge: Pivots, Peripheries and Waiting Rooms. In G. Wang (Ed.), De-Westernizing Communication Research: Altering Questions and Changing Frameworks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyo, L., & Mutsvairo, B. (2018). Can the Subaltern Think? The Decolonial Turn in Communication Research in Africa. In B. Mutsvairo (Eds.), Palgrave Handbook for Communication Research in Africa (pp. 19–40). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nail, T. (2015). The Figure of the Migrant. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. (2018). Epistemic Freedom in Africa: Deprovincialization and Decolonization. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyamnjoh, F., & Shoro, K. (2011). Language, Mobility, African Writers and Pan-Africanism African. Communication Research, 4(1), 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palumbo, D. (1995). The Ethnic Canon: Histories, Institutions, and Interventions. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parekh, B. (2000). Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, B. (2015). Critical Theory After the Rise of the Global South: Kaleidoscopic Dialectic. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, R. (1993). Culture & Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2007). Beyond Abyssal Thinking: From Global Lines to Ecologies of Knowledges. Review (Fernand Braudel Center), 30(1), 45–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, B. (2018). The End of the Cognitive Empire: The Coming of Age of Epistemologies of the South. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scolari, C., & Rodriguez-Amat, J. R. (2018). A Latin American Approach to Mediatization: Specificities and Contributions to a Global Discussion About How the Media Shape Contemporary Societies. Communication Theory, 28, 131–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shome, R. (2016). When Postcolonial Studies Meets Media Studies. Critical Studies in Media Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1183801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London and New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, C. (2015). Resurrecting the Imperial Dimension in International Communication. In C. C. Lee (Ed.), Internationalizing “International Communication”. Michigan: Michigan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (Ed.). (1994). The Politics of Recognition. In A. Gutmann (Eds.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thussu, D. K. (2009). Internationalizing Media Studies. Milton Park: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Trefzer, A., Jackson, J., Mckee, K., & Dellinger, K. (2014). Introduction: The Global South and/in the Global North: Interdisciplinary Investigations. The Global South, 8(2), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waisbord, S., & Mellado, C. (2014). De-Westernizing Communication Studies: A Reassessment. Communication Theory, 24(4), 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waisbord, S., & Szurmuk, M. (2011). The Intellectual Impasse of Cultural Studies of the Media in Latin America: How to Move Forward. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 8(1), 7–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1997). Eurocentrism and its Avatars: The Dilemmas of Social Science’. Sociological Bulletin, 46(1), 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G. (2011). De-Westernizing Communication Research: Altering Questions and Changing Frameworks. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, W. (2014). Provincializing Hegemonic Histories of Media and Communication Studies. Communication Theory, 24, 415–434.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Moyo, L. (2020). Introduction. In: The Decolonial Turn in Media Studies in Africa and the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52832-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics