Volumetric Simulation of Nano-Fibres and 2D SEM and 3D XCT Imaging Processes

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1248)


Fibres are present in many biological tissues and their geometric properties can be a useful indication of their role. Hence, imaging of nano-fibre volumes is useful for a number of different biomedical applications. It is possible to image nano-fibres with a variety of imaging modalities such as 2D Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) or 3D X-ray Computed Tomography (XCT). The 3D XCT has some advantages over conventional SEM. The principal ability is to gain an understanding of the 3D structure of objects. However, XCT has limited resolution compared to SEM. This means SEM can be useful to provide more detailed specific estimates of the sizes of structures such as estimates of the diameters of fibres. Image processing of these images has resulted in the need for a gold standard to help demonstrate the correct functioning and validation of designed algorithms. Simulation can play an important part in the validation of algorithms. However, previous works have performed limited simulations. Some methods simulate fibres as straight vectors. The approach taken here is more realistic, allowing for curving, overlapping and other more realistic generation of fibre volumes with the use of splines. The limited resolution in the imaging processes are also considered here, another important factor. Simulation results are compared with real world imaging data from both SEM and XCT. The generated results appear to show similar properties and could potentially be used as gold standards for the validation of image processing algorithms.


Nano-fibres Volumetric imaging Simulation 


  1. 1.
    Chiverton, J.P., Ige, O., Barnett, S.J., Parry, T.: Multiscale shannon’s entropy modeling of orientation and distance in steel fiber micro-tomography data. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26(11), 5284–5297 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiverton, J.P., Kao, A., Roldo, M., Tozzi, G.: Automatic diameter and orientation distribution determination of fibrous materials in micro X-ray CT imaging data. J. Microsc. 272(3), 180–195 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Danwanichakul, P., Danwanichakul, D.: Two-dimensional simulation of electrospun nanofibrous structures: connection of experimental and simulated results. J. Chem. 2014, 10 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng, Y., Sun, R., Chen, M., Liu, C., Wang, Q.: Simulation of the morphological structures of electrospun membranes. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 135(1), 45653 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    He, B., Wu, J., Chim, S.M., Xu, J., Kirk, T.B.: Microstructural analysis of collagen and elastin fibres in the kangaroo articular cartilage reveals a structural divergence depending on its local mechanical environment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 21(1), 237–245 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mostaço-Guidolin, L., Rosin, N.L., Hackett, T.L.: Imaging collagen in scar tissue: developments in second harmonic generation microscopy for biomedical applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18(8), 1772 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ng-Thow-Hing, V., Agur, A., McKee, N.: A muscle model that captures external shape, internal fibre architecture, and permits simulation of active contraction with volume preservation. In: ISCM Biomechanics & Biomedical Eng. (5.: 2001: Rome) (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sensini, A., et al.: Multiscale hierarchical bioresorbable scaffolds for the regeneration of tendons and ligaments. Biofabrication 11(3), 035026 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Urszula, S., Szewczyk, P., Kruk, A., Barber, A., Czyrska-Filemonowicz, A.: 3D imaging via FIB-SEM tomography at nanoscale for tissue engineering applications. In: European Microscopy Congress 2016: Proceedings, pp. 318–319. Wiley Online Library (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Energy and Electronic EngineeringUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  2. 2.School of Mechanical and Design EngineeringUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  3. 3.Zeiss Global CentreUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  4. 4.School of Pharmacy and Biomedical SciencesUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK
  5. 5.Institute of Biomedical and Biomolecular SciencesUniversity of PortsmouthPortsmouthUK

Personalised recommendations