Advertisement

A Framework for Jointly Assessing and Reducing Imaging Artefacts Automatically Using Texture Analysis and Total Variation Optimisation for Improving Perivascular Spaces Quantification in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1248)

Abstract

Perivascular spaces are fluid-filled tubular spaces that follow the course of cerebral penetrating vessels, thought to be a key part in the brain’s circulation and glymphatic drainage system. Their enlargement and abundance have been found associated with cerebral small vessel disease. Thus, their quantification is essential for establishing their relationship with neurological diseases. Previous works in the field have designed visual rating scales for assessing the presence of perivascular spaces and proposed segmentation techniques to reduce flooring and ceiling effects of qualitative visual scales, processing times, and inter-observer variability. Nonetheless, their application depends on the acquisition quality. In this paper, we propose a framework for improving perivascular spaces quantification using both texture analysis and total variation filtering. Texture features were considered for evaluating the image quality and determining automatically whether filtering was needed. We tested our work using data from a cohort of patients with mild stroke (\(n=60\)) with different extents of small vessel disease features and image quality. Our results demonstrate the potential of our proposal for improving perivascular spaces assessments.

Keywords

Perivascular spaces Cerebral small vessel disease Image enhancement Imaging artefact reduction Brain magnetic resonance imaging 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by: the UK Dementia Research Institute which receives its funding from DRI Ltd, funded by the UK MRC, Alzheimer’s Society and Alzheimer’s Research UK; the Fondation Leducq Network for the Study of Perivascular Spaces in Small Vessel Disease (16 CVD 05); Stroke Association ‘Small Vessel Disease-Spotlight on Symptoms (SVD-SOS)’ (SAPG 19\(\backslash \)100068); The Row Fogo Charitable Trust Centre for Research into Aging and the Brain (MVH) (BRO-D.FID3668413); Stroke Association Garfield Weston Foundation Senior Clinical Lectureship (FND) (TSALECT 2015/04); NHS Research Scotland (FND); British Heart Foundation Edinburgh Centre for Research Excellence (RE/18/5/34216); a British Heart Foundation Chair award (RMT) (CH/12/4/29762); NHS Lothian Research and Development Office (MJT); European Union Horizon 2020, PHC-03-15, project No666881, ‘SVDs@Target’ (MS); Chief Scientist Office of Scotland Clinical Academic Fellowship (UC) (CAF/18/08); Stroke Association Princess Margaret Research Development Fellowship (UC) (2018); MRC Doctoral Training Programme in Precision Medicine (JB); Alzheimer Nederland (ACCJ). The Research MR scanners are supported by the Scottish Funding Council through the Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence (SINAPSE) Collaboration; the 3 T scanner is funded by the Wellcome Trust (104916/Z/14/Z), Dunhill Trust (R380R/1114), Edinburgh and Lothians Health Foundation (2012/17), Muir Maxwell Research Fund, and the University of Edinburgh. We thank the participants, their families, radiographers at Edinburgh Imaging Facility Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, and the Stroke Research Network at the University of Edinburgh.

References

  1. 1.
    Arba, F., et al.: Enlarged perivascular spaces and cognitive impairment after stroke and transient ischemic attack. Int. J. Stroke 13(1), 47–56 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ballerini, L., et al.: Application of the ordered logit model to optimising frangi filter parameters for segmentation of perivascular spaces. Procedia Comput. Sci. 90, 61–67 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ballerini, L., et al.: Perivascular spaces segmentation in brain MRI using optimal 3D filtering. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 2132 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ballerini, L., et al.: Computational quantification of brain perivascular space morphologies: Associations with vascular risk factors and white matter hyperintensities. A study in the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936. NeuroImage Clin. 25, 102120 (2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernal, J., et al.: Deep convolutional neural networks for brain image analysis on magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Artif. Intell. Med. 95, 64–81 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Block, K.T., Uecker, M., Frahm, J.: Suppression of MRI truncation artifacts using total variation constrained data extrapolation. Int. J. Biomed. Imag. 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown, R., et al.: Understanding the role of the perivascular space in cerebral small vessel disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 114(11), 1462–1473 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Descombes, X., et al.: An object-based approach for detecting small brain lesions: application to virchow-robin spaces. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 23(2), 246–255 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Francis, F., Ballerini, L., Wardlaw, J.M.: Perivascular spaces and their associations with risk factors, clinical disorders and neuroimaging features: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Stroke 14(4), 359–371 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frangi, A.F., Niessen, W.J., Vincken, K.L., Viergever, M.A.: Multiscale vessel enhancement filtering. In: Wells, W.M., Colchester, A., Delp, S. (eds.) MICCAI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1496, pp. 130–137. Springer, Heidelberg (1998).  https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haralick, R.M., Shanmugam, K., Dinstein, I.: Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.SMC 3(6), 610–621 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jung, E., et al.: Enhancement of perivascular spaces using densely connected deep convolutional neural network. IEEE Access 7, 18382–18391 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lustig, M., Donoho, D., Pauly, J.M.: Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. Official J. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. 58(6), 1182–1195 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MacLullich, A., et al.: Enlarged perivascular spaces are associated with cognitive function in healthy elderly men. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 75(11), 1519–1523 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Potter, G., et al.: Associations of clinical stroke misclassification (‘clinical-imaging dissociation’) in acute ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 29(4), 395–402 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Potter, G.M., et al.: Cerebral perivascular spaces visible on magnetic resonance imaging: development of a qualitative rating scale and its observer reliability. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 39(3–4), 224–231 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Potter, G.M., et al.: Enlarged perivascular spaces and cerebral small vessel disease. Int. J. stroke 10(3), 376–381 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rudin, L.I., Osher, S., Fatemi, E.: Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 60(1–4), 259–268 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Smith, S.L., Walker, J.A., Miller, J.F.: Medical Applications of Cartesian Genetic Programming. In: Miller, J. (ed.) Cartesian Genetic Programming. Natural Computing Series, pp. 309–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17310-3_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Valdés-Hernández, M., et al.: Towards the automatic computational assessment of enlarged perivascular spaces on brain magnetic resonance images: a systematic review. J. Magn. Reson. Imag. 38(4), 774–785 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wardlaw, J.M., et al.: Mechanisms of sporadic cerebral small vessel disease: insights from neuroimaging. Lancet Neurol. 12(5), 483–497 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wardlaw, J.M., et al.: Perivascular spaces in the brain: anatomy, physiology and pathology. Nature Rev. Neurol., 1–17 (2020)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Clinical Brain SciencesUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Institute for Digital CommunicationsUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  3. 3.Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations